Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2015 4:05 am wrote:SAUL ALINSKY ALERT: GOOEY, BABY HUEYAND CLEMFOOIE ARE PAID SHILLS USING RULES FOR RADICALS
I intend to use this thread to prove that the three most prolific conjob posters, Guey, Baby Huey
are paid shills
, here to disrupt rather than post. I made their names pink to go with their thinly veiled sexuality, and difficult to read to match the spam they contribute to this board.
In a recent thread (viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11374#p390663
- a now-demonsrtated sex offender who has already been shown in other threads to have been arrested for molesting an eleven year old male child (If I'm lying, he's free to prove me wrong) - made the claim that gays marry EXCLUSIVELY for government benefits and for no other reason. Whenever he was asked to defend his thesis, he would either demand the other person prove it wrong, or he would make the claim that he already DID defend it, somewhere else (the same thing Clem says when challenged for links).
I will show that the three hacks I named, Gooey
, Baby Huey
, do not respond to OPs, EVER, unless they agree with them. If you post an OP they disagree with and cannot refute, they will make DOZENS of spam posts in your thread and in the case of Gooey
and Baby Huey
not ONE will actually respond to the OP. Clemfooie
(AKA Glory Hole Clem) will occasionally make a weak, random reference to the OP - but almost never sources his preposterous claims, and when he does it will be with an OpEd from Heritage or some such swill. My intention in THIS OP post is to show one of the three splooges fielding multiple requests that he source his claim - and to show how he takes his marching orders DIRECTLY from the Book, Rules for Radicals
, by Saul Aklinsky.
These are the first 20 posts gooey
- a proven and self-admitted sex offender (He's free to prove otherwise) - made in that thread. I made red
each post where Gooey
either said he's proved it elsewhere, or demanded the other prove the negative.
golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:43 pm wrote:
ES is worries his wife is going to get converted and go straight.golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:52 pm wrote:
lol... lying piece of shit. You're as bad as ES.golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:53 pm wrote:
^^ Dumbass spent months claiming he wasn't ES, now he accuses me of stealing his screen name.
No. Really. golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 1:27 pm wrote:
Another face plant by a liberal trying to bail out ES and his ignorance.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 1:29 pm wrote:
ES quoting himself because no one cares about his stupidity. How many times do you want to rehash this discussion? The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits. golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:10 pm wrote:
^^ Cannon talking to the mirror again. gooey
It's pathetic you feel you have to lie like this, to cover for ES' stupidity.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:11 pm wrote:
How many times do you want to rehash this discussion? The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits.
Proving once again your ignorance of why marriage exists.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:13 pm wrote:I have proven it. Over and over.
Not ONE of you can refute: Gays are physically incapable of having children in a gay marriage.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:20 pm wrote:
I've already proven it. That's why you're losing your mind... well, what little mind you had left.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:27 pm wrote:
^^ What Cannon always says when he's got a dick in his mouth.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:36 pm wrote:
Atta girl. Thanks for proving my point.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:37 pm wrote:
Why would people need to get married for love?I've already proven it. That's why you're losing your mind
... well, what little mind you had left.golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:38 pm wrote:
Scream a little louder Cannon. No one can hear you with that dick in your mouth.golfboy » 05 Jan 2015 6:50 pm wrote:The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits.
If you don't understand how that devalues the institution of marriage, that's YOUR problem, not mine.golfboy » 05 Jan 2015 6:52 pm wrote:
Once again ES shows his inefficacy in debate, but his inability to shut up.golfboy » 06 Jan 2015 9:20 pm wrote:
^^ Another liberal unable to refute the fact that gays ONLY get married for the government goodies
.golfboy » 06 Jan 2015 9:34 pm wrote:
Your are unable to rebut it. That makes it a fact.
Own your failure.golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:16 pm wrote:Prove me wrong.
This should be easy for someone with such a deep understanding of the issue.golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:18 pm wrote:
I have proven it, over and over. Look at any statement from a gay that wants to get married and they all same the same thing, they want the "rights" that everyone else has. They want government benefits.golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:32 pm wrote:
Recognized by whom, dope?That was the first 20 posts gooey made in that thread. viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11374#p390663Here are a selected few of the next 20:golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 8:07 pm wrote:Feel free to prove me wrong.
It should be very easy with your vast subject knowledge.golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 8:20 pm
Feel free to prove me wrong. golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 10:34 pm wrote:Isn't it strange that you're unable to prove me wrong.
Seems strange with your vast knowledge of the subject.golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 3:21 pm wrote:I've supported it.
The problem you, ES and Misty have, is you can't refute it.golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:33 pm wrote:I am standing behind my statement. Feel free to disprove it.Oh wait, you can't because it's true. At this point, he tires of our stupidity and just starts copy-pasting his responses. golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:42 pm wrote:I've stood behind my statement, and proven it. Repeatedly. You're just butthurt again because you know it's the truth and can't do anything about it
. golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:49 pm wrote:I proved it repeatedly. You're just butthurt because you hate the fact that I'm right, and can't do anything about it.
Loser.golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:58 pm wrote:
I proved it repeatedly. You're just butthurt because you hate the fact that I'm right, and can't do anything about it.