Best Posts


User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
26 Apr 2015, 5:33 am


Posts: 227
Huey » 19 Apr 2015 7:37 am wrote:

Hey Rev Al, you paid those taxes yet? Or do you have a few shakedowns in the works to raise some cash?


I ALWAY has some shakedowns comin' and some shakedowns goin' and some shakedowns on the drawin' board. Ebbybody good at sumpin'. If you find yo bliss, nigga, and make it yo korea, den you nebba gone woik a day in yo life!
100

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
29 Apr 2015, 3:37 am


Posts: 227
Cannon, I be sticky dis fred fo you. Gimme back my monies, yo.
100

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
02 May 2015, 1:56 am

Post 02 May 2015, 1:56 am

Posts: 227
Cannonpointer » 02 May 2015 1:53 am wrote:


I didn't respond to dano - I rrsponded to you. I don't know anything about that "never lost a plane" bullshit. Link? To ME, never lost a plane sounds cowardly. Unless you mean they never lost a BOMBER? Iss THAT what was being claimed? And if so, by whom?

The liberals who were horrified by my early, consistent, spirited defense of zimmerman will be glad to hear your charges against me - as will those who wince when they see me lampooning the reverend al with my sok.


What dat mean, lampalooning? If betta mean sumfin good, Pinky, or yo ass gonna catch a picket, nigga! :ninja:
100

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
07 May 2015, 4:52 am

Post 07 May 2015, 4:52 am

Posts: 227
Why da BLACK gash gotta be da shame one? I say da WHITE gash be da gash of shame!
100

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
02 May 2015, 2:01 am

Post 02 May 2015, 2:01 am

Posts: 227
Cannonpointer » 02 May 2015 1:59 am wrote:

It means mad respect, my simian liberation army bro-ham.


Oh, dat's cool den. It's all good,homie - ebony and ivory, my nigga.
100

User avatar
Posted by nuckin futz
10 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm

nuckin futz       
User avatar
      

Posts: 15366
Image

Greedy, selfish, rotten hunks of shit like Mitt Romney and the Koch Brothers are the reason why so many people are out of work and / or on government assistance. Scamming left and right to fatten their bursting bank accounts by eliminating American jobs, sending tens of thousands of American families into poverty and sucking up the profits while they laugh and live in luxury.

Most Americans want to work, want a decent job where they can progress. Not working at Goddamn McDonalds or Target. Those jobs are fine for kids going to school since they pay minimum a with no benefits. But not for adults. Most won't hire anyone over 20 anyway and California most won't hire you for fast food or retail unless your a minority I'm sorry to say.

When it comes to lazy and sitting on their asses, the 1% hold the record. Practically all were born in filthy rich families and never even had to work. Just investing their money and making more and more from a system that only benefits the rich thanks to the most corrupt government in history. Thousands of tax loopholes for the filthy rich implanted by the politicians all in exchange for bribes and campaign donations.

All the Goddamn filthy rich have to do is invest and invest. If some of their stocks fail, the system reimburses them. It's a win win situation for the rich. While most Americans work their asses off doing real work, these shit-gulping Goddamn asshole 1% kick back and do nothing but watch the money roll in. If you call meeting with the politicians and arranging bribes and money laundering hard work than you have your head up your ass.

The Goddamn 1% all need to be beaten to fucking death and all the billions they scammed out of the American people needs to be returned. And any companies like Bain Capital who specialize in destroying companies and lives should be closed, everyone involved beaten to death, and the all the billions given to families that had their jobs taken away.

And all you fucking Rethuglicans and Third Way Duhmocraps need to stop voting these bastards in! :ninja:
100

User avatar
Posted by Tiger
19 Nov 2016, 7:22 pm

Tiger      
User avatar
     

Posts: 3746
Silverfox » 19 Nov 2016 12:16 pm wrote:

Damn you.

I was all set to offer a bucket of chicken and a carton of Newports.


He ripped me off, the stupid fucker. Gave me $200 for something I paid $250 for, and did't even give me a choice ... just admin-ed hisself something that wasn't his.
100

Inglorious Bastards's Photo
Posted by Inglorious Bastards
21 Aug 2016, 9:03 am

Inglorious Bastards Watercooler Demigod
Watercooler Demigod

Posts: 12111
Cannonpointer » 20 Aug 2016 3:38 pm wrote:
Cowardly sissy chatter dressed up in man clothes. Go stroke a pistol barrel and fantasize about dick in your throat, son.

Anyone screeching to go start wars is a corporate whore like your mom.


hey turd hanger...the video was a brilliant voice over satire....you know the hahahahah, kind........give me a 100 bucks for your error
99

User avatar
Posted by Pregnar Kraps
16 May 2015, 4:49 pm

Pregnar Kraps Afraid to Disrespect the Prophet
User avatar

Posts: 1772
Cannonpointer » 16 May 2015 4:45 pm wrote:

CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE GLORIFIES AND MORALLY VALIDATES RAPE, MURDER, HUMAN SACRIFICE, SLAVERY AND GENOCIDE.

IN ORDER TO GET TO HEAVEN, CHRISTIANS ARE REQUIRED TO SYMBOLICALLY EAT THE FLESH AND DRINK THE BLOOD OF THEIR MURDER VICTIM. IT IS NOT ENOUGH THEY KILLED HIM, THEY MUST CONSUME HIM, AS WELL.

CHRISTIANS LAY THEIR SINS AT THE FEET OF THE INNOCENT, AND REQUIRE THAT THE INNOCENT PAY FOR THOSE SINS.


Is that consistent with Jesus' marching orders to Christians?

Citations, please.
98

User avatar
Posted by Herman Two Feather
16 Dec 2013, 3:13 am

Post 16 Dec 2013, 3:13 am

Posts: 180
Str8t first registered at this site as Herman Two Feather - one of my favorite soks at the poopy place. I used my wunnerful paers to steal the character back. It's good to be king, and have your own way - get a feeling of peace at the end of the day.

Any fake injun posting from THIS sok will be from yours truly. :clap:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeAigj3LG-s
96

Fake Muslim Broad's Photo
Posted by Fake Muslim Broad
13 Jan 2015, 4:25 am


Posts: 48
Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2015 4:05 am wrote:
SAUL ALINSKY ALERT: GOOEY, BABY HUEYAND CLEMFOOIE ARE PAID SHILLS USING RULES FOR RADICALS

I intend to use this thread to prove that the three most prolific conjob posters, Guey, Baby Huey and Clemfooie are paid shills, here to disrupt rather than post. I made their names pink to go with their thinly veiled sexuality, and difficult to read to match the spam they contribute to this board.

In a recent thread (viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11374#p390663), Gooey - a now-demonsrtated sex offender who has already been shown in other threads to have been arrested for molesting an eleven year old male child (If I'm lying, he's free to prove me wrong) - made the claim that gays marry EXCLUSIVELY for government benefits and for no other reason. Whenever he was asked to defend his thesis, he would either demand the other person prove it wrong, or he would make the claim that he already DID defend it, somewhere else (the same thing Clem says when challenged for links).

I will show that the three hacks I named, Gooey, Baby Huey and Clemfooie, do not respond to OPs, EVER, unless they agree with them. If you post an OP they disagree with and cannot refute, they will make DOZENS of spam posts in your thread and in the case of Gooey and Baby Huey not ONE will actually respond to the OP. Clemfooie (AKA Glory Hole Clem) will occasionally make a weak, random reference to the OP - but almost never sources his preposterous claims, and when he does it will be with an OpEd from Heritage or some such swill.

My intention in THIS OP post is to show one of the three splooges fielding multiple requests that he source his claim - and to show how he takes his marching orders DIRECTLY from the Book, Rules for Radicals, by Saul Aklinsky.

These are the first 20 posts gooey - a proven and self-admitted sex offender (He's free to prove otherwise) - made in that thread. I made red each post where Gooey either said he's proved it elsewhere, or demanded the other prove the negative.


golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:43 pm wrote:

ES is worries his wife is going to get converted and go straight.
golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:52 pm wrote:
lol... lying piece of shit. You're as bad as ES.
golfboy » 03 Jan 2015 10:53 pm wrote:
^^ Dumbass spent months claiming he wasn't ES, now he accuses me of stealing his screen name.
No. Really.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 1:27 pm wrote:
BWAAAHAHAHHAA
Another face plant by a liberal trying to bail out ES and his ignorance.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 1:29 pm wrote:
ES quoting himself because no one cares about his stupidity.
How many times do you want to rehash this discussion? The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:10 pm wrote:
^^ Cannon talking to the mirror again. gooey
It's pathetic you feel you have to lie like this, to cover for ES' stupidity.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:11 pm wrote:
How many times do you want to rehash this discussion? The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits.
Proving once again your ignorance of why marriage exists.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:13 pm wrote:
I have proven it. Over and over.
Not ONE of you can refute: Gays are physically incapable of having children in a gay marriage.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:20 pm wrote:
I've already proven it. That's why you're losing your mind... well, what little mind you had left.

golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:27 pm wrote:
^^ What Cannon always says when he's got a dick in his mouth.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:36 pm wrote:
Atta girl. Thanks for proving my point.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:37 pm wrote:
Why would people need to get married for love?
I've already proven it. That's why you're losing your mind... well, what little mind you had left.
golfboy » 04 Jan 2015 2:38 pm wrote:
Scream a little louder Cannon. No one can hear you with that dick in your mouth.
golfboy » 05 Jan 2015 6:50 pm wrote:
The ONLY reason gays marry, is so they can get government benefits.
If you don't understand how that devalues the institution of marriage, that's YOUR problem, not mine.
golfboy » 05 Jan 2015 6:52 pm wrote:
Once again ES shows his inefficacy in debate, but his inability to shut up.
golfboy » 06 Jan 2015 9:20 pm wrote:
^^ Another liberal unable to refute the fact that gays ONLY get married for the government goodies.
golfboy » 06 Jan 2015 9:34 pm wrote:
Your are unable to rebut it. That makes it a fact.

Own your failure.
golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:16 pm wrote:
Prove me wrong. This should be easy for someone with such a deep understanding of the issue.
golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:18 pm wrote:
I have proven it, over and over. Look at any statement from a gay that wants to get married and they all same the same thing, they want the "rights" that everyone else has. They want government benefits.

golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 7:32 pm wrote:
Recognized by whom, dope?

That was the first 20 posts gooey made in that thread. viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11374#p390663

Here are a selected few of the next 20:

golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 8:07 pm wrote:
Feel free to prove me wrong. It should be very easy with your vast subject knowledge.
golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 8:20 pm wrote:
Feel free to prove me wrong.
golfboy » 08 Jan 2015 10:34 pm wrote:
Isn't it strange that you're unable to prove me wrong.
Seems strange with your vast knowledge of the subject.
golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 3:21 pm wrote:
I've supported it. The problem you, ES and Misty have, is you can't refute it.
golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:33 pm wrote:
I am standing behind my statement. Feel free to disprove it.
Oh wait, you can't because it's true.

At this point, he tires of our stupidity and just starts copy-pasting his responses.

golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:42 pm wrote:
I've stood behind my statement, and proven it. Repeatedly.
You're just butthurt again because you know it's the truth and can't do anything about it.
golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:49 pm wrote:
I proved it repeatedly. You're just butthurt because you hate the fact that I'm right, and can't do anything about it.
Loser.

golfboy » 09 Jan 2015 10:58 pm wrote:
I proved it repeatedly. You're just butthurt because you hate the fact that I'm right, and can't do anything about it.
Loser.


As a fake stereotype of a traditional Muslim woman, I can only say, Li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li-li!!!!!

Have some greenies!
96

User avatar
Posted by Herman Two Feather
12 Nov 2014, 1:03 am

Post 12 Nov 2014, 1:03 am

Posts: 180
deezer shoove » 06 Nov 2014 4:54 pm wrote:
Mark Lindberg » 06 Nov 2014 4:04 pm wrote:
After all these years of Boehner refusing to work with the president, he's now demanding the president work with "the people's representatives," he called them today.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Funny that this has been one of the most, if not the most, do-nothing Congresses in history. They spent their time trying to destroy the president. Working on the people's business? They didn't do that. They've even admitted it. They are the people's employees. Any private sector employees doing nothing like Boehner & Co. would have gotten pink slips years ago.


Do nothing is the best they could do...
Did you see the shit that was out there to work on?

Why do you WANT them to do stuff anyway?
Government is just filled with asswipes... you know, your kind of people. :wave:


Oh, goodum. Another opponent to net neutrality, no doubtum.
93

Termn8tor's Photo
Posted by Termn8tor
21 Oct 2015, 4:54 am


Posts: 35
bigsky » 21 Oct 2015 4:50 am wrote:
History has shown that Germans don't take lightly religious infiltration..
Future joke...
What is the difference between a Muslim and a pizza?

The pizza don't scream when you throw it in the oven....
(Drum beat)


If you don;t have the balls to put jew in there, you shouldn't run the joke.
91

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
24 Nov 2015, 11:56 am


Posts: 227
bingster » 24 Nov 2015 10:50 am wrote:

Big difference: they had a much better vocabulary back then.


Speak fa yo'self, abnegator. My oratoriational inclusions have redoubted to a fine fetlock of putifery. Yo' jealiatious!
85

User avatar
Posted by Karl
06 Feb 2016, 9:50 am

Karl    
User avatar
   

Posts: 1495
Many "sucker's" in America belive that if you WORK HARD youll magically get AHEAD....

Ya never get ahead by just working...

Real Wealth is something ya come into like an inheritance or winning the lottery.....
82

Independent's Photo
Posted by Independent
18 Feb 2016, 9:34 pm

Independent       
      

Posts: 5596

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
20 Jan 2017, 8:56 am

Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 63290
fin » 20 Jan 2017 7:12 am wrote:

Google University Professors

jesus christ almighty............the google experts here......never heard of a topic...google a quickie.....now a lifelong expert........BAWHAHAHA

fukin retards trying to pull that shit...hahahaha....nipped that one good
Like when Obama was the first pResident EVER to bow to a foreign leader - except the tards trusted the fox instead of the google on their first false pass.

We humiliated them with photos of nixon and ike bowing to frenchmen and japs - and shortly, with photos of their cowboy swapping mouth juices with a camel jockey. They were all sudden experts on Japanese protocol, and none of THEM had been offended by the mere bow, oh no! It was suddenly HOW he bowed - and all of them swore individually to a life long connection with the orient, which explained their universal "cringe" at obama's un-japanese bow. We never learned how, in their minds, obama's bow was required to conform to japanese protocol in particular - these were undercover dicksuckers, so they tended to wilt under a heat lamp.

Those were heady days of confoolery. The google was almost as abused that day as their mistreated mitts are every night. It was a hoot and a howl.
75

User avatar
Posted by Reverend Al Sharpton
06 Nov 2014, 4:57 am

Post 06 Nov 2014, 4:57 am

Posts: 227
Affirmative action bump, my nigga. :rofl:
73

Rich Clem's Photo
Posted by Rich Clem
21 Jul 2015, 1:24 am

Rich Clem   
  

Posts: 89
Southern indep » 20 Jul 2015 11:55 pm wrote:

Can we please get some white guilt for these crimes and indecencies against humanity. 2.5 million suffering native Americans today and not one thread dedicated towards their blight in life. How does five hundred years of oppression and genocidal acts towards our native American brothers get over shadowed by three hundred years of our African American woes?


Can.I get an evil whitey everyone ?



Mmmmm.

Evil whitey.
72

User avatar
Posted by Karl
06 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm

Karl    
User avatar
   

Posts: 1495
Off-grid living is slowly and methodically being regulated out of existence by many local governments throughout the United States and Canada, an Off The Grid News analysis has found.

Although there certainly are places where living off the gird is perfectly legal, there also are quite a few locations in America and Canada where zoning regulations, building codes and other local ordinances are driving those who wish to live off the grid out of many communities.
OTGN examined laws and news stories from across North America and discovered glaring examples of government regulation:

1. Livestock regulations.
The city of Visalia, California, threatened Gingi Freeman with a $1,000-a-day fine for keeping two Nigerian Dwarf Goats – which are the size of small or medium-sized dogs — in her yard. Freeman used the goats to provide milk for her babies. The mother of two is unable to produce breast milk because of surgery she had as a teenager.

“My only options were to use formula or get breast milk from donors. There have been a couple times where we ran out of breast milk donations,” Freeman said.

Elsewhere, animal control officers seized three pygmy goats and six chickens from Dave and Sky Brown’s urban farm in the largely deserted Riverdale, Michigan, neighborhood in 2014. The officers were accompanied by police.

The animals were taken in an effort to enforce an ordinance against unlawful farm animals. At the time of the seizure, Sky Brown was worried that the animals could be killed by authorities.

The Browns were particularly upset because an animal control officer used a net to catch the chickens before they were put in crates and taken away.

“There are gun shots every night,” Brown wrote of her neighborhood. “There are meth addicts blowing up houses within blocks of us, and the city of Detroit finds it more relevant to rip screaming pets out of the hands of their devastated owners.”

3 Shocking Ways Off-Grid Living Is Being Slowly Banned In America (And Canada)
Image source: Pixabay.com

Disturbingly, it could be illegal to keep livestock even on rural property in some parts of Michigan. The state’s Commission of Agriculture and Rural Development ruled in 2014 that local governments have the right to ban livestock from any area zoned residential.

that would include subdivisions outside the city limits.

The action will “effectively remove Right to Farm Act protection for many urban and suburban backyard farmers raising small numbers of animals,” Gail Philbin of the Michigan Sierra Club told Michigan Live. The Right to Farm Act is a state law that protects farmers from nuisance lawsuits and zoning regulations.

2. Utility regulations.

Simply refusing to connect to utilities is now illegal and punishable by fines or even evictions in many places. Some people have been told they cannot live in their own homes because they refuse to connect to utilities.

Robin Speronis of Cape Coral, Florida, was evicted from her own home by city officials. Her offense: She was not hooked up to the city’s water system.

Speronis was cited by a code enforcement officer after she told a local television that she was living without utilities. Interestingly, city officials admitted that Speronis did not have to use the water simply; she simply needed to be connected.

Even the magistrate who initially upheld Speronis’ conviction acknowledged that the case was irrational. (Listen to an interview with Speronis here.)

“Reasonableness and code requirements don’t always go hand-in-hand … given societal and technical changes (that) requires review of code ordinances,” Special Magistrate Harold S. Eskin said.

Speronis was not alone. Officials in Clark’s Harbour, Nova Scotia, refused to grant Cheryl Smith a certificate of occupancy for her new home because it did not have wiring for smoke detectors and ventilation systems. The home violated a building code that requires such a setup.

3 Shocking Ways Off-Grid Living Is Being Slowly Banned In America (And Canada)
Image source: Pixabay.com

A refusal to install smoke detectors almost got an off-grid Amish family evicted from their home in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Watchdog reported that Amos and Vera Borntreger had to retain a lawyer and go to court to keep county inspectors from evicting them and their six children from their home.

The couple had refused to install smoke detectors because such devices violate their Amish faith.

The smoke detectors were mandated by the Uniform Dwelling Code or UDC, a common national building code.

A judge actually issued the eviction order, which was later retracted.

“Eau Claire County has the unfortunate distinction of being the only county in the United States that has used placard eviction to put an Amish family out of their home,” said David Mortimer, the spokesman for the local chapter of the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom.... @JustPassinThru...

Meanwhile, using a septic tank is banned in some areas, as North Carolina resident Ingrid Larsen discovered. The Southeast Brunswick Sanitary District would not let Larsen use a septic tank because there already is a sewer line near her property. (Listen to an interview with Larsen here.)

Larsen refused to use the sewer system because in 2005 a sewage pumping station failed and caused 10,000 gallons of human waste to flood her home. The waste was so toxic that her home had to be demolished.

3. Gardening banned.

Even growing a vegetable garden can lead to expensive fines and harassment from authorities.

Hermine Ricketts and her husband, Tom Carroll, were given a choice of tearing out their 17-year-old organic vegetable garden or face a $50-a-day fine. Officials in Miami Shores, Florida, ordered the garden torn out for aesthetic reasons; it was in the front yard.

“We are already feeling the impact of shopping for overpriced organic food,” Ricketts told The Miami Herald.

The city eventually backed down.

Jennifer and Jason Helvenston of Orlando, faced a $500-a-day fine, also for planting a vegetable garden in their front yard. The home lacks a back yard.

The two had to lobby the city council with a petition to get the ordinance overturned. They also organized a movement called Patriot Garden, which encouraged residents to plant radishes in their front yards as an act of civil disobedience.

Image source: Pixabay.com

Elsewhere, Julie Bass of Oak Park, Michigan, was threatened with a 93-day jail sentence for planting a vegetable garden in her own front yard in 2011, ABC News reported.

Bass faced jail for planting green tomatoes, zucchini and baby peppers in five large planters outside of her home in a Detroit suburb. She had permission from her neighbors to install the planters.

“Michelle Obama plants vegetables on the White House front lawn. I don’t think the jury is going to think that it’s suitable for the White House, but it’s not suitable for Oak Park,” Bass’ attorney, Solomon Radner, told ABC News.

Josée Landry and Michel Beauchamp faced a fine of $100 to $300 a day for turning the front yard of their home in Drummondville, Quebec, into a vegetable garden.

The couple credited the garden for helping them lose a combined 100 pounds in weight. City officials demanded that the two tear out 70 percent of the garden to comply with a zoning ordinance, or face the fines.

The ordinance required that 70 percent of the front yard be a lawn or a flower garden.

Officials backed down after 29,000 people signed a petition created by gardening advocate Roger Doiron, The Huffington Post reported.

What is your reaction to this story? Which side do you take? Share your thoughts in the section below:

Are You Prepared For A Downed Grid? Read More Here..

© Copyright Off The Grid News

3 Shocking Ways Off-Grid Living Is Slowly Being Banned In America (And Canada) | Off The Grid News
Last edite
72