Worst Posts


User avatar
Posted by Misty
08 Mar 2017, 10:55 pm

Post 08 Mar 2017, 10:55 pm
Misty Senior Moderator
User avatar
Senior Moderator

Posts: 18160
In a series of tweets in 2011 and 2012 Trump said that as ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman was a "lightweight" and "weak" and claimed that China "did a major number on us" during his tenure.

He also said that Huntsman 'gave away our country' to China.

Fast forward to 2017:

Donald Trump offers Jon Huntsman job of ambassador to Russia.

I guess it's okay if he gives away our country to Russia.
5

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
09 Mar 2017, 5:41 am

Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61827
#ShePersisted » 08 Mar 2017 10:59 pm wrote:
You spit that shit out repeatedly like some kind of a demented parrot on crack.

Better get used to telling years of lies in defense of a con artist posing as a Republican/Conservative who is a serial pussy grabbing criminal and a pathological liar.
Donald tRump didn't mistreat any women, PSYCHO. They wanted their pussies grabbed, according to their body language. It was his way of vulgarly seducing them when he cheated on his third wife, you immoral DIM.

CLINTON!!! CLINTON!!! CLINTON!!!

Every man in America grabs women by the pussy when they want to vulgarly seduce them, DIM. :\

This has already been explained to you, but your are TOO DISHONEST to stop your lying, you serial rapist defending PSYCHO!

Termin8tor » 18 Jan 2017 2:57 pm wrote:
It was in the context of vulgarly seducing them.

If that's "sexual assault," then likely every male in the US has been guilty of it, mis-reading a woman's intent.
We ALL grab women by the pussy when we cheat on our wives, you dishonest PSYCHO! :\
5

User avatar
Posted by Misty
10 Mar 2017, 4:13 pm

Misty Senior Moderator
User avatar
Senior Moderator

Posts: 18160
LouCabrazi » 10 Mar 2017 1:44 pm wrote:
Jobs report says unemployment rate falls to 4.7%

Wait, I'm confused.
Now that the Terror of Twitter is running things is that the real number?

Because when the black guy was in charge that was never the real number, right?

Oh well.
I guess it fell from 12% to 4.7% in only 50 days.

Thank you Mr. Trump!
MAGA
5

User avatar
Posted by Cedarswamp
11 Mar 2017, 7:03 am

Post 11 Mar 2017, 7:03 am
Cedarswamp Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister

Posts: 16176
Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2017 5:50 am wrote:
The recipe for excellence is easy - I can tell you how I figured out the ingredients, and how I cause excellence in my places of employment.

I started with a few simple adages about human nature:

1. People are like water: They take the path of least resistance;
2. People are like water: They take the shape of their container.
3. A man is the room he is in.

If you grant those premises, the ingredients for excellence are clear.

1. People are like water: They take the path of least resistance; Excellence must be made the path of least resistance (build in sure punishments for mediocrity and sure rewards for excellence).
2. People are like water: They take the shape of their container. You must be the excellence - always, unrelentingly - you want from your people.
3. A man is the room he is in.The work place must be guarded against the enemy of your vision (better to be short handed than wrong handed).

I have heard "managers" brag that things go so much more smoothly when they are in their shops. Inwardly, I roll my eyes at these idiots. They're not managers at all - they're supervisors. Whether I am in my shop or not, my people act as if my eyes are on them - just as I always have my boss's eyes on me, though he is never watching because he doesn't have to.

The only way you will ever learn how to put your eyes in their heads is if you first put your own boss's eyes in your head. That recipe will always be tailored to the leader implementing it. There is no doing to tell. The being gives the doing. Who you be causes what you do - not the other way around. If doing causes being, you're at effect. If being causes doing, you're at cause.

This OP is political. It's just not obvious.


I started to read this but then took the path of least resistance, then took the shape of the NHB container.....that's the room in which I found myself.

TLDR

You should start a political thread.

:ninja:
5

User avatar
Posted by Misty
13 Mar 2017, 12:23 pm

Misty Senior Moderator
User avatar
Senior Moderator

Posts: 18160
LouCabrazi » 13 Mar 2017 10:50 am wrote:
Trump wants his name on ALMOST everything.
Trumpcare being the exception, he doesn't want his name on TRUMPCARE.

Trump will only put his name on the law if he gets paid for it.
5

User avatar
Posted by Misty
13 Mar 2017, 2:51 pm

Misty Senior Moderator
User avatar
Senior Moderator

Posts: 18160
Huey » 13 Mar 2017 12:27 pm wrote:
#ShePersisted » 13 Mar 2017 12:22 pm wrote:
Huey » 13 Mar 2017 11:08 am wrote:
As I recall Obama did not like Obamacare when it first came out. Wasn't until it was passed and going thru the court system that he accepted it.
I wasn't aware that Obama had his name on many products and buildings all over the world.
Not sure what that has to do with the price of tea in china but, OK.

It has everything to do with this thread.
Go back and read the title again.
This is the ONE THING that Trump doesn't seem to want his name attached to.
:rofl:
5

User avatar
Posted by bigsky
14 Mar 2017, 10:13 pm

Post 14 Mar 2017, 10:13 pm
bigsky       
User avatar
      

Posts: 15306
bigsky » 12 Mar 2017 8:20 am wrote:
Ha...Mitch and his son Dallas are first and second out of Kaltag....

They did it...Mitch won...son Dallas came in second....how Fucking cool....
5

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
16 Mar 2017, 3:40 am

Post 16 Mar 2017, 3:40 am
Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61827
indago » 16 Mar 2017 3:33 am wrote:

Here is an example:

Darren Cunningham wrote for The Detroit Free Press 7 June 2015:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Brandon Smith, a proud father of four, lives in Muskegon. He said he works long hours at an office furniture manufacturer to make ends meet, and it's been rough. A few years ago, Smith said he got laid off. So he filed for unemployment benefits to help pay the bills.

“They approved me at the beginning. There wasn’t no problem. I was following the steps.

...Months later, after going back to work, he said he learned his wages were being garnished by the Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency.

..."I could hardly provide for my family."
---------------------------------------------------------------------

article
All this guy did was use the insurance he had paid for - and that smirking piece of shit clown celebrates his misery. :evil:
5

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
17 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm

Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61827
Termin8tor » 17 Mar 2017 10:37 am wrote:
I cite likely 50 times the sources you do, psycho.
You mean these, you simple minded freak?

Termin8tor» 06 Aug 2015 6:33 pm wrote:
Not even liberal pundits are so stupid as to claim
Termin8tor » 15 Oct 2015 3:50 pm wrote:
I'm recalling from memory, wackjob, and given that it was decades ago ...I'm likely correct.
Termin8tor » 15 Jun 2015 9:16 am wrote:
I've for many, many, many years cited sources to back up my claims.
Termin8tor » 15 Oct 2015 4:46 pm wrote:
Reality isn't determined by a link, Dim.
Termin8tor » 04 Jun 2015 2:39 pm wrote:
Anyone with the slightest knowledge of history knows
Termin8tor » 23 Sep 2015 8:45 am wrote:
Anyone with eyes knows
Termin8tor » 12 May 2015 6:50 pm wrote:
Gosh, who should we believe, the babbling, lying psychotic?
Or the best minds on Economics and history?
Termin8tor » 13 Nov 2015 2:24 pm wrote:
Anyone who lived through that era or has read extensively about it knows
Termin8tor » 07 May 2015 10:54 am wrote:
Only a psychotic would deny
Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2015 9:06 am wrote:
No honest person would claim
Termin8tor » 13 Oct 2015 8:57 pm wrote:
I bring more sources to the board than perhaps anyone. I have proved almost every claim I've made.
Termin8tor » 10 Oct 2015 5:34 pm wrote:
Anyone who's followed politics knows that.
Termin8tor » 17 Mar 2017 10:37 am wrote:
I cite likely 50 times the sources you do, psycho.
Termin8tor » 04 Nov 2015 10:48 am wrote:
Only a leftist liar would call a hugely successful developer like Trump a "nutjob."
Termin8tor » 07 May 2015 10:07 am wrote:
No one except a fringe leftist/and or psychotic would claim
Termin8tor » 05 Jan 2015 8:58 am wrote:
That's widely acknowledged by mainstream sources.
Termin8tor » 03 Sep 2015 2:03 pm wrote:
I'll bet blind
Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2015 5:59 am wrote:
...the moonbat who denies the widely accepted fact
Termin8tor » 18 Oct 2015 1:10 pm wrote:
from what I understand. Babbling psychotic imbecile.
Termin8tor » 25 Sep 2014 10:52 am wrote:
...admit obvious, widely accepted reality.
Termin8tor » 27 Aug 2015 12:54 pm wrote:
Blah, blah, blah, the endless bleating of a lying psychotic.
5

roadkill's Photo
Posted by roadkill
17 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm

roadkill       
      

Posts: 15587

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
17 Mar 2017, 11:06 pm

Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61827
bigsky » 17 Mar 2017 11:02 pm wrote:
Anyone notice that since the nigger left the honkey house the press don't give a fuck about cops shooting niggers...and neither does misty and neither does annoyed liberal and neither does only a lady and neither does cannon and neither does rebel and neither does juries, and neither does dead niggers daddy's (because they don't know their kids) and neither does niggers mommas and neither does Santa clause and neither does......
False. I am still the self-appointed leader of the Moorish Resistance League. :ninja:
5

User avatar
Posted by bigsky
19 Mar 2017, 10:16 pm

bigsky       
User avatar
      

Posts: 15306
CanuckleSandwich » 19 Mar 2017 10:02 pm wrote:

So it was fate.....or a mail order catalog.

I was walking through glacier national park and fell in this cave like thing...my dick got hard and when I tried standing up I noticed that the cave like thing was a pussy...a pussy so big Trump couldn't grab it....well anyway it was the first time she had a dick reach the bottom AND the sides...needless to say, after we got that trucker out of her pussy...(he thought it was his sleeper) we eloped
5

User avatar
Posted by indago
19 Mar 2017, 6:06 pm

Post 19 Mar 2017, 6:06 pm
indago       
User avatar
      

Posts: 7568
Nighthawk » 19 Mar 2017 5:42 pm wrote:
indago » 19 Mar 2017 4:35 pm wrote:
Nighthawk » 19 Mar 2017 2:46 pm wrote:

If this program is really such a great thing, then why not simply make it voluntary, dumbass? Why should people be FORCED to pay into a program they may not want?


Pure conjecture on your part!


I see you are still stuck on stupid. How the hell is asking a simple question a matter of "conjecture", idiot?


"If", and "may" are conjectural, DumFuk! Here's one for you: If pigs could fly, they just may fly right up your ass!
5

larryc12's Photo
Posted by larryc12
19 Mar 2017, 5:55 pm

larryc12       
      

Posts: 12847
LouCabrazi » 19 Mar 2017 2:34 pm wrote:
Just another post about CONS favorite place... the public bathroom.


It's another post about the LEFT'S obsession with public bathrooms. Don't even try that shit, Lulu. You're the ones making the stink over bathrooms.
5

User avatar
Posted by Cedarswamp
10 Jan 2016, 10:29 pm

Cedarswamp Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister

Posts: 16176
Technocrat » 10 Jan 2016 9:08 pm wrote:

A Meta Analysis of studies of climate papers taking a stance showed over 90% of said papers agreed with AGW. Multiple sources confirm this, even ones anti global warming. According to the same anti-global warming source used by Golfboy, the professor said "yes, an overwhelming and broad consensus exists among climate scientists specifically." So yes, it's true.

The consensus is fact. It only declines when you move outside of the relevant field of climate science. It is not debatable. At all. Moreover, every major scientific professional organization agrees with AGW and supports it. Every. Single. One. Period.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

I guess NASA along with 200 other major scientific foundations and independent organizations are ALL IN ON your conspiracy too bro. Libertarians have a strong political tendency toward radical conspiracy theorizing. You give Alex Jones his market. What you are doing is approaching a 9/11 Truther level of crazy conspiracy.


NASA along with 200 other major scientific foundations and independent organizations are relying on a Google search by a cartoonist blogger.

It's listed as footnote one at your link. :rofl:
5

User avatar
Posted by nuckin futz
22 Mar 2017, 9:26 am

Post 22 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
nuckin futz       
User avatar
      

Posts: 14744
Termin8tor » 22 Mar 2017 8:41 am wrote:

I've been correct in six out of seven elections I've predicted.

Lying trolls like you only cite my mistakes.

You're demented. :loco:


Lets call you; NOSTRADUMBASS! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
5

User avatar
Posted by nuckin futz
21 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm

nuckin futz       
User avatar
      

Posts: 14744
Make the Commander in Chief lead his troops into battle, or NO WAR at all! :clap:

In the spirit of general Patton.
5


TonySplacci's Photo
Posted by TonySplacci
22 Mar 2017, 9:20 pm

TonySplacci       
      

Posts: 13561

User avatar
Posted by Obummerstinks
22 Mar 2017, 9:44 pm

Obummerstinks       
User avatar
      

Posts: 8961
I'll settle for term limits and shooting any politician remotely talking to a lobbyist - and then stringing the lobbyist up - and confiscating the companies top 5 dogs homes and transportation.

It's a start.....but I'd bet sure would put the brakes on the shenanigans for profit these bastards play...

Did I mention .50 cent bullet for the politician...oh ya - good deal.
5