Money for All Users


Strain&Hedge's Photo
Posted by Strain&Hedge
16 Jan 2014, 5:09 am

Strain&Hedge Emperor of the Pheasants
Emperor of the Pheasants

Posts: 9027
You are not authorised to read this forum.
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 3:29 am

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
You are not authorised to read this forum.
1

Skeptic's Photo
Posted by Skeptic
15 Jan 2014, 9:31 pm

Skeptic Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 3095
TheAmerican » 15 Jan 2014 8:28 pm wrote:
...you should be ashamed of yourself, scumbag!

Telling everyone YOU did the 'coding' for the new forum? You DID NOT!


http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 42#p145568

...same as you misused and adjusted the 'reputation points' at the old .org??

You're a disgrace!


OK. Now I know that you are the board's humorless, Whiner-in-Chief!
1

User avatar
Posted by KarlChilders
16 Jan 2014, 7:08 am

KarlChilders      
User avatar
     

Posts: 3112
Callout Threads

For those unfamiliar with terminoa callout thread is posting another members screename in a thread title usually for the sole purpose of DOUCHEBAGGERY

Anyhow it takes a BIG MAN to op a CALL OUT thread and it takes an even BIGGER MAN to CALL ALL of you OUT

So consider yourselves CALLED OUT once and FOR ALL

Yeah bet ya ain't got the STONES to do that

So man up grow a set and GET REAL or GET LOST

Dumbass
1

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
15 Jan 2014, 9:43 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 9:43 pm
Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61781
TheAmerican » 15 Jan 2014 8:36 pm wrote:
...BAD idea, since you have mod 'features' to MISUSE!


Chuck is no longer in charge, son. I have the same features that you have.

At the other site, mods had 50 reds to hand out per day, and norms had 5. That's how chuck rolled. Mods could make polls - norms couldn't.

Things are a bit more egalitarian here. I''m still smarter than you, but that's on God, not me (Though I DID work at it, and you ARE clearly an intellectual couch potato).
1

User avatar
Posted by deezer shoove
15 Jan 2014, 11:21 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 11:21 pm
deezer shoove       
User avatar
      

Posts: 8290
Skeptic » 15 Jan 2014 9:03 pm wrote:
Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2014 8:27 pm wrote:
We now have reputation points - but you can only give positive for the time being. The only way you can give negative rep, right now, is to take away positive rep.

We're working on that.

If you cannot see the option, hit ctrl F5. That is all.


Yours don't seem to be carrying from post to post. Otherwise, I'm sure it'd be over 500 by now.
Kissass.
1

littlehawk12's Photo
Posted by littlehawk12
16 Jan 2014, 1:28 am

Post 16 Jan 2014, 1:28 am
littlehawk12 Spammer
Spammer

Posts: 8650
So no matter how much you suck, members are limited to how much we can vote down your stupidity? :clap: :rofl: :die:
1

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
16 Jan 2014, 1:45 am

Post 16 Jan 2014, 1:45 am
Cannonpointer 98% Macho Man
User avatar
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61781
Why are you such a queer? :huh:
1

User avatar
Posted by TheAmerican
15 Jan 2014, 9:49 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 9:49 pm
TheAmerican       
User avatar
      

Posts: 22203
Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2014 8:43 pm wrote:
TheAmerican » 15 Jan 2014 8:36 pm wrote:
...BAD idea, since you have mod 'features' to MISUSE!


Chuck is no longer in charge, son. I have the same features that you have.

At the other site, mods had 50 reds to hand out per day, and norms had 5. That's how chuck rolled. Mods could make polls - norms couldn't.

Things are a bit more egalitarian here. I''m still smarter than you, but that's on God, not me (Though I DID work at it, and you ARE clearly an intellectual couch potato).


...yes, after you 'cut off' the feature for us to give you reds??

Scumbag liar!

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2186/cannonpointer-the-compulsive-liar#.UtdIO_umXmI
1

User avatar
Posted by Annoyed Liberall
16 Jan 2014, 9:59 am

Annoyed Liberall Hot Little Twist
User avatar
Hot Little Twist

Posts: 31079
So this third world retard actually thinks you were serious when you said that? Maybe in Retardistan or where ever he comes from people really do hang on crosses.
2

Hat_Creek's Photo
Posted by Hat_Creek
16 Jan 2014, 11:22 am

Post 16 Jan 2014, 11:22 am
Hat_Creek      
     

Posts: 1561
Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2014 12:10 am wrote:
littlehawk12 » 16 Jan 2014 12:00 am wrote:
Down vote for rep points because CP will skew them against people he don't like, just like he did at the .org site..


Read the thread, homo. I have the same points to spend as you do. Notice you can post polls here, tard? Yeah - we're a little more egalitarian


Big word abuser. From a redneck point of view.
I'm certain it was covered before tenth grade, the end of my formal education.
Somehow, I made it that far sleeping in class.
I must be a genius.
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 11:23 am

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
"Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

--- the terrorist Ann Coulter
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 11:28 am

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
"In contemplating college liberals, you really regret, once again, that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals by making them realize that they could be killed, too. Otherwise they will turn out into outright traitors." -- CPAC conference, 2002

---- fascist Ann Coulter


really? there is a need to debate that?
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 11:32 am

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
(talking about Norman Mineta's cautioning the use of racial profiling against terrorism) "[Secretary Mineta] is burning with hatred for America. He has taken the occasion of the most devastating attack on U.S. soil to drone on about how his baseball bat was taken from him as a child headed to one of Franklin Roosevelt's Japanese internment camps.

[b]As Mineta has endlessly recounted in interviews of late: 'I remember on the 29th of May, 1942' -- note that he remembers the day -- 'when we boarded the train in San Jose under armed guard, the military guard, I was in my Cub Scout uniform carrying a baseball, baseball glove and a baseball bat. And as I boarded the train, the MPs confiscated the bat on the basis it could be used as a lethal weapon.'[/b]

Good G-d! A guard took Mineta's baseball bat as a child, and as a result he's subjecting all of America to the Bataan Death March! Someone please give him a baseball bat." -- Ann Coulter, "Mineta's Bataan Death March" 2/28/02

Does this woman have sand in her vagina or something? Norman Mineta by far is one of the most patriotic citizens in this country. Despite adversity and being interned at a Japanese internment camp during World War II, Mineta served this country faithfully as a U.S. Army intelligence officer in Japan and Korea. He was also the mayor of San Jose and served in the U.S. House of Representatives for 20 years. He also helped establish the Americans with Disabilities Act. To say Norman Mineta is subjecting the United States to the Bataan Death March and burning with hatred for America because of anti-Japanese discrimination he faced as a child is far from the truth. If Mineta is "burning with hatred for America" then why is he the Secretary of Transportation for the Bush Administration?
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 11:37 am

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
(talking to a disabled Vietnam vet) "People like you caused us to lose that war." -- MSNBC
A disabled Vietnam veteran fought against communism while cheney dodged. The subhuman is nothing more than a media whore
1

SallyForth's Photo
Posted by SallyForth
16 Jan 2014, 11:29 am

SallyForth      
     

Posts: 2202
golfboy » 16 Jan 2014 10:26 am wrote:
She's right. You're not.

Imagine that.


That's her one statement I agree with completely. It's too bad she took away from the statement by adding the nonsense at the end. It was unnecessary and tasteless.
1

User avatar
Posted by Spirit of Molly
16 Jan 2014, 6:51 am


Posts: 322
GeorgeWashington » 14 Jan 2014 7:38 pm wrote:
What in the genesis account would lead you to believe that it isn't to be taken literally as the first man, the first woman, and the first sin?

For starters, the story is pretty obviously allegorical because of the way it is constructed, but if you want to look at the literal interpretation, there are a couple of issues to consider.

Adam and Eve were not the first man and first woman, read Genesis 1, near the end of that chapter, god creates man and woman – at the same time – in his own image and likeness, out of nothing, then tells them to make lots of babies. These humans are never identified. Early in chapter 2, god creates Adam out of the dust of the earth and breathes life into him, then creates Eve through surgery. There is no indication that the first two humans were Adam and Eve, they were created in a different manner, so Adam and Eve were the second couple created. That is how the text reads.

More importantly, eating the fruit of the tree if knowledge of good and evil was not a "sin". God told them the fruit would kill them, so he explained why they should not eat it, not "because .i say so". Before they ate it, they did not understand right and wrong, the gained the ability to discern that from eating the fruit. In order to "sin", you have to understand morality, but in this case, we have the circular argument that gaining an understanding of morality becomes a sin. In the US Constitution, they specifically prohibit this kind of ex post facto conviction. You cannot do a morally wrong thing ("sin") if you do not know that it is wrong, "sin" must be freely chosen, not accidental or from duplicity.

Genesis was compiled by Rabbis, it is a Jewish text, the Jews do not have a concept of "original sin", that was grafted on by the christians. The Eden story symbolizes the "point" where humans stopped being animals that functioned primarily on instinct and started to use reason to deal with moral issues. There is nothing in there about being irrational or flawed (in fact, gaining moral understanding is exactly the opposite of irrational).
1

Brattle Street's Photo
Posted by Brattle Street
16 Jan 2014, 1:21 pm

Brattle Street       
      

Posts: 14222
golfboy » 16 Jan 2014 12:06 pm wrote:
Here are just a few quotes from the Quran:
Again, I plead with you to educate yourself, instead of relying on the internet to school you over and over.

Quran (8:12) -
"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

Quran (8:39) -
[i]"And fight with them until there is no more fitna
(disorder, unbelief)
and religion should be only for Allah"

Quran (9:5) -
"So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."

Quran (9:29) -
"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."

Quran (47:3-4) -
[i]"Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similitude. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,"
[/i]

[/i]


and when you can cite what each of those quotes pertaining to in historical context, AND cite every passage in the Quran that seems to contradict the ones you cited, we will have to assume that that your scholarship on the subject is cartoon cutout Horowitz driven cherry picking.
1

User avatar
Posted by GeorgeWashington
16 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm

GeorgeWashington       
User avatar
      

Posts: 5319
"God Damn America as long as she tries to act like she is God and she is supreme"

http://youtu.be/Ix-AMYos0Js

I don't see why anyone on the right would have a problem with this sermon considering Wright is calling out the failures of government..
1

User avatar
Posted by TotallyRad
16 Jan 2014, 1:30 pm

Post 16 Jan 2014, 1:30 pm
TotallyRad The Moderate Left
User avatar

Posts: 9903
golfboy » 16 Jan 2014 12:22 pm wrote:
Obama is commander in chief and should be charged with dereliction of duty and impeached.


Why? Was he reading "My Pet Goat" while the country was being invaded?
1