Money for golfboy


User avatar
Posted by golfboy
15 Jan 2014, 6:16 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
16 Jan 2014, 5:21 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Annoyed Liberall » 16 Jan 2014 3:11 pm wrote:

Battery and infidelity.

You should have shot him. Any man that hits a woman deserves to be shot.
As far as I'm concerned, they are like pedophiles... there is no way to "fix" their problem.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
16 Jan 2014, 7:16 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Wharf Rat » 16 Jan 2014 6:13 pm wrote:
How are the endlessly ineffective anti Obama memes doing?

Better than your math skills. Seen his approval rating lately - back to 39%.

Image
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
18 Jan 2014, 11:58 pm

Post 18 Jan 2014, 11:58 pm
golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2014 9:39 pm wrote:

The case law had nothing whatsoever to do with violating treaties. All the case law said - IN PASSING - was that the were "some" impleid powers under Art 2 Sec 2. However, it certainly applies as much or ore here as it did as you pretended to apply it.

You can whine and snivel about me holding you to your own homosexual standard, but you are still the same fag and you will still be held to your own standard, hackboy.

Now, whine some more, bitch.

LOL, You don't have a clue what you're talking about. Hell, I'm sure you not only didn't read the case law I posted, but you don't even remember the parts of it I quoted.

And thanks again for the homosexual attacks.
You do this every time you're butthurt and can't defend yourself.
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
19 Jan 2014, 11:44 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Truthwarrior757 » 19 Jan 2014 10:40 am wrote:
Does lying to yourself make you feel better ? :LOL:

He must enjoy rejection because he repeatedly drops these steaming turds from politicus, and then has to run away and hide when his claims get the shit kicked out of them.
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
20 Jan 2014, 7:34 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
danobivins » 20 Jan 2014 6:07 pm wrote:

You didn't answer any of my points, you've just thrown up smoke and ducked.
You know nothing abt the reports, like goofyboy, all u know is wht rush tells u.
You're like goofyboy, saying iraq had wmds when bush and cheney and all the inspectors said they...didn't.
U will believe ONLY what u want to believe, and will pull your pants down for the agitprop masters.
There's nothing here, and Issa, the guy with a criminal record as long as my arm, will use u as a "usefull idiot" the same way he uses nutbags like goofboy.
Have fun in your own private idaho, wingnutt.

I always enjoy watching this illiterate idiot whining that other people don't know what they're talking about.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
20 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm

Post 20 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
danobivins » 20 Jan 2014 11:12 am wrote:

A: what were they supposed to do? Do u have access to the top level comms?
The nearest air base was 6 hrs away. What gives u the cred to eval top level classified ops? You're forming opinions with nothing, and ignoring all data and reports. Why r u unconcerned about the 23 similar incidents during the Bush reign of error?
No story here, just neo-con, karl rovian rhetoric meant to attack the hildebeast pre-2016. Pure politics.

"Nearest air base was 6 hours away".
How long did the attack last? And how long into the attack did the last american die?
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 12:10 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Skeptic » 21 Jan 2014 11:09 am wrote:

Gosh. Polls seem to be changing...

// Most Voters Skeptical Of Chris Christie's Bridgegate Claims, Poll Finds
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/2 ... 33221.html

How does that poll change the earlier one? Hint: It doesn't.
The poll you cite doesn't even ask about the "bully" question.
Dumbass.
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 9:01 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
greatnpowerfuloz » 21 Jan 2014 2:00 am wrote:

The threat is invisible to those who don't see a healthy, wealthy middle class as essential to a healthy, wealthy economy, They are usually the same head in the sand individuals who lack knowledge of their own country's history.

For some, the potential of a two class system doesn't worry them in the least. They're just ignorant enough to believe they'll be at the top with the wealth creators, either by luck or as reward for years of loyal bootlicking.

That's a pretty funny speech coming from someone that willingly left the U.S. for the English class system.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 10:32 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
I get a kick out of liberals who scream about income inequality, and also support Obama's use of taxpayer money to feed wall street.
It's sad that these idiots don't understand they are the CAUSE of the growth of income inequality, not the champions of it's victims.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 1:05 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Brattle Street » 21 Jan 2014 9:43 am wrote:
let's see what we learned here. goofy agrees that there IS an unhealthy imbalance of wealth distribution, and we learned that goofy thinks it is a bad thing. Most interestingly, we learned that a trend that has existed since at least as long as recorded history, is Obama's fault.

Once again you don't know WTF you're talking about.
The trend has not existed as long as recorded history. The numbers now reflect the same percentage as around 1915. In the 50's, 60's and 70's the income gap narrowed markedly, then started expanding again under Carter/Reagan/Clinton. It dropped again during the recession, but is now expanding at a healthy rate again because of Obama's policies.

You really should read about a subject before making claims that simply aren't true.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 10:28 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
GailyBee » 21 Jan 2014 9:15 am wrote:

But...but...HE did it, FIRST!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You are so easy, goofnuts. I shouldn't bust on you, but you make it such a great way to start my day...

Not my fault you can't debate facts.
You're a liberal and therefore incapable of dealing with facts.
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
21 Jan 2014, 8:39 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2014 7:33 pm wrote:
That's why southern democrats felt so back-stabbed when the national party forced them to end Jim Crow.
ALL of the southern white racists were democrats - COMMITTED democrats, and haters of the party of Lincoln.
It took a lot to force the sea change which turned the south red. Something big happened - and it wasn't your mom's enormous vagina.

And to which party did liberals belong, son, or did they simply not exist in the 60's?
0

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
16 Jan 2014, 7:19 pm

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2014 6:15 pm wrote:

"In debt" is not even an honest term. These partisan hacks pretend that "liabilities" from a century out are "unfunded," because the people who will need them have not yet been born to pay for them.

The Social Security Trust Fund has trillions of dollars in liquid assets, but they pretend it is "broke" because, by law, it was required to invest the money in sovereign debt - that is, the fund holds T-BILLS. If a Wall Street investment firm held trillions of dollars in T-Bills in its portfolio, they would declare it solvent and solid,because they cannot imagine our nation ever defaulting on Wall Streeters. But they declare SS insolvent, since they know in their black hearts that they would vote to rob our seniors.

I challenge anyone to explain their two-faced memes by any other rationale.

Now Cannon wants to change the subject because he can't debate the facts about the Medicare liabilities.
-6

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
17 Jan 2014, 10:20 am

Post 17 Jan 2014, 10:20 am
golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
GeorgeWashington » 17 Jan 2014 7:58 am wrote:
Sept. 11: Benghazi Attack Timeline

  • 2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (8:30 p.m. Benghazi time)
    • U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens steps outside the consulate to say goodbye to a Turkish diplomat. There are no protesters at this time. (“Everything is calm at 8:30,” a State Department official would later say at an Oct. 9 background briefing for reporters. “There’s nothing unusual. There has been nothing unusual during the day at all outside.”)
    3 p.m.
    • Ambassador Stevens retires to his bedroom for the evening. (See Oct. 9 briefing.)
  • Approximately 3:40 p.m
    • A security agent at the Benghazi compound hears “loud noises” coming from the front gate and “gunfire and an explosion.” A senior State Department official at the Oct. 9 briefing says that “the camera on the main gate reveals a large number of people – a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound.”
  • About 4 p.m.
    • This is the approximate time of attack that was given to reporters at a Sept. 12 State Department background briefing. An administration official identified only as “senior administration official one” provides an official timeline of events at the consulate, but only from the time of the attack — not prior to the attack. The official says, “The compound where our office is in Benghazi began taking fire from unidentified Libyan extremists.” (Six of the next seven entries in this timeline — through 8:30 p.m. EDT — all come from the Sept. 12 briefing. The exception being the 6:07 p.m. entry, which comes from Reuters.)
  • About 4:15 p.m.
    • “The attackers gained access to the compound and began firing into the main building, setting it on fire. The Libyan guard force and our mission security personnel responded. At that time, there were three people inside the building: Ambassador Stevens, one of our regional security officers, and Information Management Officer Sean Smith.”
  • Between 4:15 p.m.-4:45 p.m.
    • Sean Smith is found dead.
  • About 4:45 p.m.
    • “U.S. security personnel assigned to the mission annex tried to regain the main building, but that group also took heavy fire and had to return to the mission annex.”
  • About 5:20 p.m.
    • “U.S. and Libyan security personnel … regain the main building and they were able to secure it.”
  • Around 6 p.m.
    • “The mission annex then came under fire itself at around 6 o’clock in the evening our time, and that continued for about two hours. It was during that time that two additional U.S. personnel were killed and two more were wounded during that ongoing attack.”
  • 6:07 p.m.
    • The State Department’s Operations Center sends an email to the White House, Pentagon, FBI and other government agencies that said Ansar al-Sharia has claimed credit for the attack on its Facebook and Twitter accounts. (The existence of the email was not disclosed until Reuters reported it on Oct. 24.)
  • About 8:30 p.m.
    • “Libyan security forces were able to assist us in regaining control of the situation. At some point in all of this – and frankly, we do not know when – we believe that Ambassador Stevens got out of the building and was taken to a hospital in Benghazi. We do not have any information what his condition was at that time. His body was later returned to U.S. personnel at the Benghazi airport.”

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/

Need an insertion around 5pm - this is where Obama was informed of the terrorist attack on our consulate.
-1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
22 Jan 2014, 8:39 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
All I know is that if I'm travelling through a city I'm not familiar with, don't choose MLK as an exit to get fuel/food.
1

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
22 Jan 2014, 9:09 am

golfboy       
User avatar
      

Posts: 51289
KarlChilders » 22 Jan 2014 6:12 am wrote:
At a TIME when LEGALIZATION is Gaining momentum the GOP wants to further CRIMINALIZE Marijuana possession in Wisconsin

That's the wonderful thing about our states. Each is free to make their own path.
If you don't like it, don't live in Wisconsin.
1