Money for onlyaladd


User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
15 Jan 2014, 10:33 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
littlehawk12 » 14 Jan 2014 5:56 am wrote:
Like anyone is going to take someone named 'peepee' seriously. Go jump off the nearest cliff, homo..

Sorry bro. I like you but I had to laugh about reading that from littlehawk12. I guess tinychicken11 was wicked busy.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
15 Jan 2014, 11:42 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 11:42 pm
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
Of course this devolved into the merits of abortion. I love that they make condoms and birth control available to poor people( who benefit society the most by not having unplanned kids). That saves money in the long run big time. I'd like to see abortions reduced to the bare minimum, in a perfect world eliminated. But the point here is our money is not used for the abortions.
All this blustering you guys are doing with outright lies of what it is isn't advancing the discussion.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
16 Jan 2014, 8:55 pm

Post 16 Jan 2014, 8:55 pm
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
bigsky » 10 Jan 2014 11:22 pm wrote:
I was just there..seatac needs evaporated....and bozeman mt makes better coffee

It's an international airport hub. Not really into coffee production there as far as I know. Anyhow no one goes to visit seatac. They go to Seattle which is great. Seatac is basically just housing for airport and hotel workers.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
18 Jan 2014, 11:19 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
Obummerstinks » 18 Jan 2014 10:12 pm wrote:
I'm going to laugh my ass off if you chumps, your media, and all the leftist extremists being brought in to try and hang this guy..............fails. If you dipshits don't come up with a smoking gun, ya'll are going to be referencing him in two years as Mr. President.

I'm already laughing that you think Fatty McBridgecloser could ever win.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
18 Jan 2014, 10:01 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
RichClem » 18 Jan 2014 8:48 pm wrote:

Which for some strange reason hasn't worked for Obama, despite being twice the size.

I guess Keynesian Economics only works for conservatives. Must be magic! :rofl:



You might as well have the words "Lying Troll" tattooed to your forehead. :\



Behold the Pride of Board Liberals. :rofl:

It only happened right in front of your beady little troll eyes.

So from Reagan's departure in 1988 plus 26 years it's well 2014. Yet you claim there is no current boom. And in fact loudly complain that the recovery from the latest republican failure isn't fast enough. Which is it?
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
15 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
TheNightStalker » 15 Jan 2014 8:40 pm wrote:
He called out TheNightStalker. He will pay the ultimate price.

Whatever you have zero credibility. Everything is a lie. Think about it.
-1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
15 Jan 2014, 11:48 pm

Post 15 Jan 2014, 11:48 pm
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
I'll prove it too. You want my address?
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
16 Jan 2014, 12:37 pm

Post 16 Jan 2014, 12:37 pm
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Washington D.C.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
20 Jan 2014, 12:53 am

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
The no minimum wage thing is big in China cons. Care to comment?
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
20 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
rayj » 20 Jan 2014 12:12 pm wrote:
With the competition for jobs between blacks and Hispanics, I'd have to say he'd be against amnesty!

What say you?

He was more of an inclusive guy. Not just for blacks but for true equality. He'd be pro imo
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
21 Jan 2014, 9:10 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
I'm sure if a dem did it there would be 50 cons in here outraged.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
21 Jan 2014, 9:33 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
rayj » 21 Jan 2014 8:28 pm wrote:
Why do people depend on the government so much? Make the wrong choice on your college major and now you can't find a job? Not to worry. Uncle Sam will hire you, and you don't even have to work! Make a few mistakes and have multiple kids from multiple men? No big deal. Uncle Sam is rich! He'll take care of you and your bastard kids.

What do the above two examples have in common? Choice! In both examples, there was a choice made. Why should I have to pay for someone's bad choice?

The choice was to go into the military. I often haveproblems with the way we use are military. But the people who go in and serve often have a difficult time coming back into the civilian work place and deserve more respect than cons give them.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
22 Jan 2014, 1:09 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
The 85 people cannot logically have more than the1%. They are a very small part of that 1%. We have to hold ourselves to a higher standard or it diminishes the overall point. Which is a valid one.
0

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
22 Jan 2014, 2:40 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
I'm embarrassed I actually made the same very obvious error in math that golfboys did in the beginning. Lets see how long he takes to reach the conclusion a sixth grader should be able to in a matter of minutes.

Remember
50% of bottom of population haa .7% of wealth
85 at the top also have an equal .7%
these too groups of POPULATION SETS have an EQUAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL WEALTH.
As clearly stated in L.A. Times and others.

On another note
1% of the POPULATION has 46% of the total WEALTH

That also means that of the 46% of the total wealth owned by the 1% the top 85 people are responsible for .7%

I can't make this any easier for you regards.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
22 Jan 2014, 6:12 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
KarlChilders » 22 Jan 2014 6:43 am wrote:
Roger Goodell suports doing away with the EXTRA POINT kick after touchdowns

The kick which has a nearly 100 percent success rate is all too automatic and 2 point conversations are rarely attempted until last minute desparation

The FIX

Eliminate the KICK and make ALL Touchdowns worth 7 points with an option to run a play afterwards but if it FAILS they LOSE one point

That sounds interesting. The kick is dumb from that range. So in this scenario if they make it do they get two but lose one if they don't?
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
23 Jan 2014, 1:48 am

Post 23 Jan 2014, 1:48 am
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
Can't see what you wrote. But somehow you make more sense that way. Not going to be your boyfriend I don't swing that way. I can tell you like me.
-1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
23 Jan 2014, 10:54 am

Post 23 Jan 2014, 10:54 am
onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
Str8tEdge » 23 Jan 2014 4:50 am wrote:

Damn... and I liked onlyaladd. He's pretty cool for being a faggot loser dum dum progressive. :LOL:

Thanks buddy. Lol
-1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
24 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
I'm glad people bring this up. The boom bust bubble economics are unsustainable and will always end in a crash. We need to focus on creating and manufacturing things instead of just manipulating financial markets.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
24 Jan 2014, 4:46 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
Reasonable » 24 Jan 2014 2:41 pm wrote:
Bill Maher showed a picture of the Duck Dynasty guys when they were clean shaven and wearing Tommy Bahama shirts with their Penny loafers.
No controversial crazy conservative comments then.

These long bearded super conservative NOW guys is an act. Every con who defended them were taken for a ride, they were duped. Just like they were with Glen Beck.
Suckers.

Not to mention these "reality" shows are completely faked...much like pro wrestling (spoiler alert cons sorry). They target viewers who don't posses the skills to think critically and question them. Much like the GOP and fox news. So when I hear that ratings are up it just reminds me there are a lot of morons out there.
1

User avatar
Posted by onlyaladd
24 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm

onlyaladd       
User avatar
      

Posts: 21764
I was really begining to believe that the vast vast majority of scientists were correct on this but then some conservative told me there was ice on the road and it was a bit chilli in JANUARY. So all that science goes right out the window.
2