Climate Scientists Laugh at Global Warming Hysteria

Started by Tiger

This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules

PreviousNext
104 replies to this topic Sticky this thread

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
  48,012 03 May 2016, 4:57 pm

golfboy Liberal Anti-Matter
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 51,289
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 48,011.85



Log in or register to remove this ad..
TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 4:54 pm wrote:
golfboy » 03 May 2016 3:46 pm wrote:
^^ Dumbass doesn't understand that water CAN be polluted, but is not itself a pollutant.
This is what happens to liberals that aren't man enough to admit he's wrong about anything.


^^^ Thinks FDR had the big stick.

No I don't. But you're the moron that thinks CO2 and Water are pollutants. :rofl:
0
ES » 07 Oct 2014 11:23 am wrote:
I've been doing face plants before your lies ever darkened any political forum.

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:46 am wrote:
Facts suck when you're a progressive.

Technocrat » 04 Sep 2014 12:15 pm wrote:
British invented English, you know.
:die:
Log in or register to remove this ad..

User avatar
Posted by Technocrat
  28,707 03 May 2016, 5:06 pm

Technocrat Alexander Fuckin' Hamilton
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 13,071
Location: New Jersey
Socialist Socialist political affiliation
Politics: Socialist
Gender: Male
Money: 28,707.25



Except they aren't laughing at "global warming hysteria," They aren't even laughing at the ignorant denials, because they are so dangerous.
0

User avatar
Posted by TotallyRad
  7,037 03 May 2016, 5:56 pm

TotallyRad Leaning just left of Center.
User avatar
The Moderate Left

Posts: 9,903
Liberal Liberal political affiliation
Politics: Liberal
Money: 7,036.72



golfboy » 03 May 2016 4:57 pm wrote:
TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 4:54 pm wrote:
golfboy » 03 May 2016 3:46 pm wrote:
^^ Dumbass doesn't understand that water CAN be polluted, but is not itself a pollutant.
This is what happens to liberals that aren't man enough to admit he's wrong about anything.


^^^ Thinks FDR had the big stick.

No I don't.


I have a link at the bottom of the page that says otherwise. Are you admitting that you were wrong about something?
0
golfboy » 22 Apr 2016 3:47 pm wrote:
One has to wonder if Tommy is intelligent enough to know what FDR was referring to, when he talked about the "big stick".


golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
  48,012 04 May 2016, 7:51 am

golfboy Liberal Anti-Matter
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 51,289
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 48,011.85



TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 5:56 pm wrote:


I have a link at the bottom of the page that says otherwise. Are you admitting that you were wrong about something?

Yes, I did admit I was wrong about that. I had the wrong Roosevelt. Big deal.
I ALWAYS admit when I'm wrong about something. Unlike you morons on the left.

"Water is a pollutant". :die:
That's a special kind of stupid right there.
Then to think you double and tripled down on that stupidity.
0
ES » 07 Oct 2014 11:23 am wrote:
I've been doing face plants before your lies ever darkened any political forum.

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:46 am wrote:
Facts suck when you're a progressive.

Technocrat » 04 Sep 2014 12:15 pm wrote:
British invented English, you know.
:die:

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
  48,012 04 May 2016, 7:53 am

golfboy Liberal Anti-Matter
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 51,289
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 48,011.85



Technocrat » 03 May 2016 5:06 pm wrote:
Except they aren't laughing at "global warming hysteria," They aren't even laughing at the ignorant denials, because they are so dangerous.
If they are ignorant, why is it that you idiots have to lie about the data?
The alarmists have been caught changing temps over and over again.
Yet you're still a believer.


I have to admit that I admire your faith.
0
ES » 07 Oct 2014 11:23 am wrote:
I've been doing face plants before your lies ever darkened any political forum.

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:46 am wrote:
Facts suck when you're a progressive.

Technocrat » 04 Sep 2014 12:15 pm wrote:
British invented English, you know.
:die:

User avatar
Posted by TotallyRad
  7,037 04 May 2016, 8:39 am

TotallyRad Leaning just left of Center.
User avatar
The Moderate Left

Posts: 9,903
Liberal Liberal political affiliation
Politics: Liberal
Money: 7,036.72



golfboy » 04 May 2016 7:51 am wrote:
TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 5:56 pm wrote:


I have a link at the bottom of the page that says otherwise. Are you admitting that you were wrong about something?

Yes, I did admit I was wrong about that. I had the wrong Roosevelt. Big deal.
I ALWAYS admit when I'm wrong about something. Unlike you morons on the left.
.


Heh... It took you a pretty long time to admit you were wrong about Roosevelt, Mr I always admit when I'm wrong. :rofl:
0
golfboy » 22 Apr 2016 3:47 pm wrote:
One has to wonder if Tommy is intelligent enough to know what FDR was referring to, when he talked about the "big stick".


golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
  48,012 04 May 2016, 8:47 am

golfboy Liberal Anti-Matter
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 51,289
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 48,011.85



TotallyRad » 04 May 2016 8:39 am wrote:
golfboy » 04 May 2016 7:51 am wrote:
Yes, I did admit I was wrong about that. I had the wrong Roosevelt. Big deal.
I ALWAYS admit when I'm wrong about something. Unlike you morons on the left.
.


Heh... It took you a pretty long time to admit you were wrong about Roosevelt, Mr I always admit when I'm wrong. :rofl:

I always admit when I'm wrong. You on the other hand NEVER do, Mr. "water is pollution".
How fucking ignorant ARE you?
0
ES » 07 Oct 2014 11:23 am wrote:
I've been doing face plants before your lies ever darkened any political forum.

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:46 am wrote:
Facts suck when you're a progressive.

Technocrat » 04 Sep 2014 12:15 pm wrote:
British invented English, you know.
:die:

User avatar
Posted by TotallyRad
  7,037 04 May 2016, 9:00 am

TotallyRad Leaning just left of Center.
User avatar
The Moderate Left

Posts: 9,903
Liberal Liberal political affiliation
Politics: Liberal
Money: 7,036.72



golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.


Now that's funny!
0
golfboy » 22 Apr 2016 3:47 pm wrote:
One has to wonder if Tommy is intelligent enough to know what FDR was referring to, when he talked about the "big stick".


golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.

User avatar
Posted by golfboy
  48,012 04 May 2016, 9:02 am

golfboy Liberal Anti-Matter
User avatar
      
      

Posts: 51,289
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 48,011.85



TotallyRad » 04 May 2016 9:00 am wrote:
golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.


Now that's funny!
It's sad you don't have the integrity to admit when you're wrong.
Of course, there wouldn't be any other posts from you, would there?

"Water is pollution". :rofl:
0
ES » 07 Oct 2014 11:23 am wrote:
I've been doing face plants before your lies ever darkened any political forum.

Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2014 10:46 am wrote:
Facts suck when you're a progressive.

Technocrat » 04 Sep 2014 12:15 pm wrote:
British invented English, you know.
:die:

roadkill's Photo
Posted by roadkill
  6,670 16 May 2016, 9:42 am

roadkill       
      

Posts: 15,500
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 6,670.23

golfboy » 04 May 2016 9:02 am wrote:
It's sad you don't have the integrity to admit when you're wrong.
Of course, there wouldn't be any other posts from you, would there?

"Water is pollution". :rofl:




"Sons of Climategate: Dodgy Scientists Caught Red-Handed by FOIA Lawsuit"



http://www.breitbart.com/environment/20 ... a-lawsuit/
0
Image

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 9:58 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



JoeLib » 03 May 2016 8:52 am wrote:

It's always easier just to say "You're going to lose!" than to carefully consider something.
You've proved it's easy to skirt flap your ass away from every challenge to debate - or even produce - the science, boy.

Your bullshit has been tried and found severely wanting.
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 9:59 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



JoeLib » 03 May 2016 9:08 am wrote:

I'll start to rethink my position when the world scientific community does.
Show us the science you believe in, ass hat.

WHERE'S THE BEEF?
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 10:02 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



Do you just laziily swallow poppy cock like a jap whore downing a glass of bukake, boy?

JoeLib » 03 May 2016 9:50 am wrote:

Yes, thinking is an effort.
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 10:13 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



JoeLib » 03 May 2016 10:14 am wrote:

If you believe that hundreds of thousands of people who've devoted their lives to discovering the truth about vital subjects can all be bought,
That isn't how the game works, child.

Their spokesmen have been bought - and they've been silenced.

Scientists don't even own the labs they work in - much less the newspapers that print the lies about their findings. They have no independent access to a broad audience, such that they COULD correct the record if they wished to. And if they DID go on a jihad to correct the record, they be hatchet jobbed - and shits like you would glory in their defamation, insisting they should go to jail.

You've been confronted with absolute proof of lie after lie, where the actual research science abstracts were presented and shown to say the opposite of what the IPCC's politically motivated final report, putatively based on that science, claimed it said - and you ran like a scalded little bitch from the thread.

And that's all well and good - but to keep flapping your cock trap after being refuted and after running away like a bitch - that's so dishonest and cowardly that we need a new word for it.

Ah, hell. I'm too lazy - I'll just go with shit stain.
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 10:15 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 10:15 am wrote:

It's real. The question is what Its always been: How much damage have we done? If it can be proven that we've had negible impact, We go home happy. But Nobody has been able to do that.
Yes, it's remarkable how hard it is to prove the negative.

Good thing that isn't our burden.
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 16 May 2016, 10:22 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



golfboy » 03 May 2016 10:15 am wrote:
See what I mean? "The last generation" :rofl: Honestly, who's stupid enough to believe ANYTHING that starts out like that? Well, besides you, of course.
And your guardian article is the one I was mocking, when I said the oceans ate your homework.
The fact is, the satellite data shows there hasn't been ANY warming for the last 2 decades.
So of course, you have to change the data.

And I didn't say there weren't any proposals. I said there weren't any proposals that WOULD WORK.
I guess you missed that part.
How many "point of no returns" have we passed already?
Why is it that not a SINGLE Goebbel warming prediction has come true?
Why are glaciers GROWING?
Here is the god of Goebbel Warming, agreeing with me.
We are at the precipice of the gateway to the very tipping point of of the prelude to the ultimate marker of the last chance to turn back from the very edge of the final off ramp before the onset of the threshold, make no mistake.

I am going to count three, and it all goes to hell.

One


Two


Two, and one down.

Two and two down - I mean it, young man.

Two, two down and one.

Two, two down and two - I'm not playing!

Two, two down and two with one against you.

Two, two down and two with two against you! I'm serious!
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


roadkill's Photo
Posted by roadkill
  6,670 16 May 2016, 10:29 am

roadkill       
      

Posts: 15,500
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 6,670.23

Cannonpointer » 16 May 2016 10:22 am wrote:
We are at the precipice of the gateway to the very tipping point of of the prelude to the ultimate marker of the last chance to turn back from the very edge of the final off ramp before the onset of the threshold, make no mistake.

I am going to count three, and it all goes to hell.

One

Two

Two, and one down.

Two and two down - I mean it, young man.

Two, two down and one.

Two, two down and two - I'm not playing!

Two, two down and two with one against you.

Two, two down and two with two against you! I'm serious!



2 and 15/16ths :)
0
Image

User avatar
Posted by TotallyRad
  7,037 16 May 2016, 3:41 pm

TotallyRad Leaning just left of Center.
User avatar
The Moderate Left

Posts: 9,903
Liberal Liberal political affiliation
Politics: Liberal
Money: 7,036.72



Cannonpointer » 16 May 2016 10:15 am wrote:
TotallyRad » 03 May 2016 10:15 am wrote:

It's real. The question is what Its always been: How much damage have we done? If it can be proven that we've had negible impact, We go home happy. But Nobody has been able to do that.
Yes, it's remarkable how hard it is to prove the negative.

Good thing that isn't our burden.


Is it truly a negative?
0
golfboy » 22 Apr 2016 3:47 pm wrote:
One has to wonder if Tommy is intelligent enough to know what FDR was referring to, when he talked about the "big stick".


golfboy » 04 May 2016 8:47 am wrote:
I always admit when I'm wrong.

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,516 17 May 2016, 1:29 am

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,620
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,515.79



TotallyRad » 16 May 2016 3:41 pm wrote:

Is it truly a negative?
Yes, it is. Those who say we caused something are on the hook to show we caused it. Those who say we didn't do that are not on the hook. The climate has been climating for longer than humans have been humaning - and throughout all of that time, pre and post human, it has made enormous changes. For you to SUDDENLY jump up an take credit, you're gonna need evidence.

Answer me this, and be honest. Do you think we are causing eclipses?

And if you do,what evidence will you accept against your theory?
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


roadkill's Photo
Posted by roadkill
  6,670 17 May 2016, 7:55 am

roadkill       
      

Posts: 15,500
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 6,670.23


Cannonpointer » 17 May 2016 1:29 am wrote:
Yes, it is. Those who say we caused something are on the hook to show we caused it. Those who say we didn't do that are not on the hook. The climate has been climating for longer than humans have been humaning - and throughout all of that time, pre and post human, it has made enormous changes. For you to SUDDENLY jump up an take credit, you're gonna need evidence.

Answer me this, and be honest. Do you think we are causing eclipses?

And if you do,what evidence will you accept against your theory?



The science is settled...the debate is over.


The earth is a sun trapped in a planet's body.


There...now the progs are happy.
1
Image


PreviousNext

Return to No Holds Barred Political Forum

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 0 guests

Who has visited this topic