charles.thompson » 12 Jan 2017 12:23 pm wrote:
I can tell you exactly what part of the CNN news report was fake news.
The fact that they are choosing to mention it at all suggests that it could be relevant, perhaps even credible.
This is the president elect, and for the sake of basic decency, we dont need to hear about unfounded conspiracies about him. At the very least, this should not be a story until it is confirmed true. If they want to cover it, then the tone instead should be 'why are partisan unnamed sources still trying to discredit our president elect'?
That could all be said about the birther issue as well.
Consistency is not your friend.