Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch?

Started by Termin8tor

This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules

18 replies to this topic Sticky this thread

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 01 Apr 2017, 11:10 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Log in or register to remove this ad..

Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch? There is absolutely no question he's highly qualified.

He was confirmed to his last position by an overwhelming margin.
So why are they opposing him for SCOTUS?

Possible answers:

1) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

2) Democrats don't care if the Constitution is honestly upheld

3) Democrats are so bitterly anger that HRC lost that they'll oppose out of pure spite.

4) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

5) Dems are responding to their lunatic base :rofl: :rofl:

Claire McCaskill: I'm filibustering Gorsuch over his "stunning lack of humanity."
:loco:
1
Log in or register to remove this ad..

User avatar
Posted by Cedarswamp
  6,722 01 Apr 2017, 11:48 am

Cedarswamp Sideways Down an Old Dirt Road
User avatar
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister
Cannonpointer's Internet Barrister

Posts: 16,162
Classical Liberal Classical Liberal political affiliation
Politics: Classical Liberal
Money: 6,722.16



Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2017 11:10 am wrote:
Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch? There is absolutely no question he's highly qualified.

He was confirmed to his last position by an overwhelming margin.
So why are they opposing him for SCOTUS?

Possible answers:

1) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

2) Democrats don't care if the Constitution is honestly upheld

3) Democrats are so bitterly anger that HRC lost that they'll oppose out of pure spite.

4) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

5) Dems are responding to their lunatic base :rofl: :rofl:

:loco:


They think the Republicans stole the nomination. They think acting like petulant children will make them feel better.
0
If something I say offends you, blame your parents for raising a pussy.

User avatar
Posted by nuckin futz
  19,469 01 Apr 2017, 12:17 pm

nuckin futz User avatar
      
      

Posts: 14,668
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: Independent
Money: 19,469.33

I'm ok with him!
0

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people

Image

User avatar
Posted by Redrock
  3,067 01 Apr 2017, 12:46 pm

Redrock User avatar
     
     

Posts: 2,541
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,067.04

Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2017 11:10 am wrote:
Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch? There is absolutely no question he's highly qualified.

He was confirmed to his last position by an overwhelming margin.
So why are they opposing him for SCOTUS?

Possible answers:

1) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

2) Democrats don't care if the Constitution is honestly upheld

3) Democrats are so bitterly anger that HRC lost that they'll oppose out of pure spite.

4) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

5) Dems are responding to their lunatic base :rofl: :rofl:

Claire McCaskill: I'm filibustering Gorsuch over his "stunning lack of humanity."
:loco:
Because Republicans opposed Garland.
0

User avatar
Posted by nuckin futz
  19,469 01 Apr 2017, 12:50 pm

nuckin futz User avatar
      
      

Posts: 14,668
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: Independent
Money: 19,469.33

Ding! Dong! We have a winner!

"vengeance is a dish best served cold!" :LOL:
0

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people

Image

User avatar
Posted by Huey
  10,922 01 Apr 2017, 12:54 pm

Huey User avatar
      
      

Posts: 25,851
Liberacon Liberacon political affiliation
Politics: Liberacon
Money: 10,921.86



The difference is the pubs control congress AND have the presidency. I see a rule change coming. If the pubs have any balls. Something the leadership has been lacking.
0
An example of left wing arrogance:
onlyaladd » 09 Nov 2016 9:37 am wrote:
Notice all the low performing, uneducated states swung this election? Why should those who have failed lead those who succeeded?
Time to go to popular vote. Now you deplorables get to joyfully defend the biggest liar in political history for 4 years.
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
Good luck morons, you asked for this.

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 01 Apr 2017, 12:55 pm

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Redrock » 01 Apr 2017 12:46 pm wrote:
Because Republicans opposed Garland.


Except that Repubs didn't do anything in that case that Dems hadn't done and long advocated.
0

User avatar
Posted by Redrock
  3,067 01 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm

Redrock User avatar
     
     

Posts: 2,541
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,067.04

Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2017 12:55 pm wrote:
Redrock » 01 Apr 2017 12:46 pm wrote:
Because Republicans opposed Garland.


Except that Repubs didn't do anything in that case that Dems hadn't done and long advocated.
Yes but I think you're forgetting (but probably not) that it's ok for Dims to do it, but not for Repubs. (In their eyes).
0

User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,587 01 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,661
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,586.68



nuckin futz » 01 Apr 2017 12:50 pm wrote:
Ding! Dong! We have a winner!

"vengeance is a dish best served cold!" :LOL:
When repubs invoke the nuclear option, dessert is gonna suck.
0
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


User avatar
Posted by Cannonpointer
  20,587 01 Apr 2017, 2:08 pm

Cannonpointer Sacred Cow Tipper
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man

Posts: 61,661
Location: St. Pete, Baby!
Insurrectionist Insurrectionist political affiliation
Politics: Insurrectionist
Money: 20,586.68




Huey » 01 Apr 2017 12:54 pm wrote:
The difference is the pubs control congress AND have the presidency. I see a rule change coming. If the pubs have any balls. Something the leadership has been lacking.
No, the senate repubs are moving slowly, hoping the dems will pull their heads out. We should be a happy that they are not acting precipitously.

The spanking is coming - let the child fulminate a bit longer and prove he really needs it.
1
Only the weakest ideas must be protected from debate, and only religions declare people heretics.

Humanity's law of the jungle: survival of the tribe
Money is a theory until spent - then a value statement


When your map disputes the territory, it's your map that is wrong.
Where there's much sizzle, expect little steak
Honesty is intentional - lies are the lazy way out


Nostalgia is a crime against what happened
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me


TonySplacci's Photo
Posted by TonySplacci
  12,749 01 Apr 2017, 3:45 pm

TonySplacci       
      

Posts: 13,530
Independent Independent political affiliation
Politics: N/A
Money: 12,748.52

Gorsuch is white
0
Image

User avatar
Posted by Str8tEdge
  34,250 01 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm

Str8tEdge User avatar
Emperor of the Pheasants
Emperor of the Pheasants

Posts: 29,221
Libertarian Libertarian political affiliation
Politics: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Money: 34,250.36

LouCabrazi » 01 Apr 2017 3:45 pm wrote:
Gorsuch is white


Why would they cater to niggers when they KNOW you fucking morons will vote for them no matter what they do?
0
Rebel » 01 May 2015 10:03 am wrote:
Hey, liar, have you heard the news? Multiple charges against six racist white pigs in the death of a 25-year old black man they illegally arrested and subsequently assaulted while in their custody. To sum up the Attorney General's decision - BAZINGA!!
May those racist white pigs receive their due justice in prison.

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 05 Apr 2017, 8:25 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

LouCabrazi » 01 Apr 2017 3:45 pm wrote:
Gorsuch is white


Only on the outside! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
0

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 05 Apr 2017, 8:26 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2017 11:10 am wrote:
Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch? There is absolutely no question he's highly qualified.

He was confirmed to his last position by an overwhelming margin.
So why are they opposing him for SCOTUS?


And as usual, not one single intelligent answer from a liberal.

Any of you liberals want to brag about how you're smarter and more educated than conservatives? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
0

User avatar
Posted by NeoConvict
  19,172 05 Apr 2017, 8:32 am

NeoConvict User avatar
      
      

Posts: 17,324
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 19,171.69

Think they are displeased now, wait till they see who replaces Ginsberg. :D
0
Democrats haven't been this upset since the republicans took away their slaves.




Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 05 Apr 2017, 8:45 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

NeoConvict » 05 Apr 2017 8:32 am wrote:
Think they are displeased now, wait till they see who replaces Ginsberg. :D


I can hear the shrieking and wailing already. :)

I expect Trump to win re-election, so who knows how many seats will open up?
0

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 06 Apr 2017, 3:56 pm

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Obviously board liberals don't have the slightest clue why Dems oppose him. :blink:

.

Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2017 11:10 am wrote:
Why are Democrats opposing Gorsuch? There is absolutely no question he's highly qualified.

He was confirmed to his last position by an overwhelming margin.
So why are they opposing him for SCOTUS?

Possible answers:

1) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

2) Democrats don't care if the Constitution is honestly upheld

3) Democrats are so bitterly anger that HRC lost that they'll oppose out of pure spite.

4) Dems are responding to their lunatic base

5) Dems are responding to their lunatic base :rofl: :rofl:

:loco:
0

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 08 Apr 2017, 10:02 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Termin8tor » 06 Apr 2017 3:56 pm wrote:
Obviously board liberals don't have the slightest clue why Dems oppose him. :blink:


Any liberals want to brag about being smarter and better educated than conservatives?

No? Thought not. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

One of my favorite bumper stickers from the late 1970s was “Nuke the Gay Whales for Jesus,” which managed to skewer several pieties at once. I’ll take nuking the Senate filibuster for the confirmation of Judge Gorsuch. It’s hard to believe the Democrats could be so dumb.

Next thing you know they’ll nominate a corrupt, unappealing 69-year-old woman for president. Oh, wait. . . :clap: :clap:

.

.

Image

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... dition.php
0

Termin8tor's Photo
Posted by Termin8tor
  3,973 21 Apr 2017, 9:25 am

Termin8tor      
     

Posts: 3,326
Conservative Conservative political affiliation
Politics: Conservative
Money: 3,973.40

Still not one single coherent expression in answer to my question.

All those intelligent, ejucated liberals must be somewhere else. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Oh my, more bad news for liberals. You're about to lose SCOTUS for a generation or more. :)

Imagine the shrieking and wailing if Trump can replace two or three more justices, especially liberals. :clap:

Developing: Rumors Suggest Trump May Have Opportunity To Pick Another Supreme Court Nominee ‘Very Soon’


Rumors have been piling up around the nation’s capital that president Trump will be able to nominate another Supreme Court vacancy this year.
http://www.redstate.com/mwalsh8/2017/04 ... very-soon/
0



Return to No Holds Barred Political Forum

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

Who has visited this topic