-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
I'd simply chalk it up to a slow news day. Hardly a reason to undertake a full frontal assault, don't you think?Misty » Yesterday, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Think of what an exciting life Tucker must lead that he has nothing better to do than critique the type of footwear that a candy company chooses to put on their mascots.
P.S. I would sooner gouge my eyes out with a rusty spoon than watch FOX News. I just happened to see Tucker being raked over the coals, and deservedly so, on Twitter over this ridiculous non-issue.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Careful, any day now we'll get a photo of how he's proud of the aluminum siding he put on his outhouse.Huey » Yesterday, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a shared wall condo that looks really run down on the outside. But wait, he will post his view.
I have seen shacks in the WV hills that still have an out house with better views.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
I think the failure of the radical progressive agenda is a good thing for people to see, especially for those morons who actually voted for Biden and his whore.nefarious101 » Yesterday, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ People as a whole looked at it that way but lately with all the hatred and racism spewing out of the communist progressive movement people are beginning to see them as a real danger and a threat to themselves, their families, their business and their country.
This could get real ugly if it continues
I can deal with their ugliness!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Please, not on a Sunday!Huey » Yesterday, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Careful, he will post his underwear pics and workout videos again.
Look what your suggestion did to my dog!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
They're all smiles as their level of incompetence blazes a trail through our country, and the people are now seeing it every day.DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Self-congratulatory **** like this is so phony.
It's like the Oscar presentations.
Fake hugs and smiles to show the masses...
:
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Yeah, I'm sure it's closer to a 20 year old mobile home like his car that's taking up space in a run-down trailer park than a temple.omh » Yesterday, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ it was a temple, his character destroyed the time his gender had adapting to living here now.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
As long as I can rub their nose in the hypocrisy they prefer to ignore while exposing their ignorance, it becomes almost palatable.nefarious101 » Yesterday, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ The enemy is within.....we all know that.....it's become like a plague infesting all aspects of our lives...government itself isn't an issue....it's those running our government both elected and bureaucratic
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
I wouldn't know, and I'd care even less to finding out. Useless exercises like that which you use to thrill yourself are quite boring, believe me.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Skiing is technique intensive, with good reason.
Though ski design has evolved to make things much easier for the average skier, leaving the "controlled conditions" to heed the Call of the Wild demands a bag of tricks which have evolved for decades..
My friend is feeling the pull and he needs a guide.....the Wild is why I don't ski anything with a waist....the groomed is there to take you to hair, or a chair.
You wouldn't survive very long above 4,000 feet, right?
Just curious, but how many other friends of yours need your assistance to guide them to help "feel the pull"?
Isn't that something they would prefer to do alone while watching porn?
Remember, your body is a temple.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Yes, I'm sure overcoming the uselessness of an education is right up your alley, being such an expert in that field.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny you should ask....for several years I've been meeting them either at Snowbird or Mammoth. Because Sr. decided to get serious about skiing fairly late, they usually engage ski instructors...
I'm there to help them overcome the baleful influence of Institutional Learning.
And to turn my distinguished buddy into a 4 rail riding derelict.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
So here's what I'm wondering.nefarious101 » 22 Jan 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin owns the Biden crime familyState Dept. Tells Families of Embassy Workers in Ukraine to Leave Starting Monday: Report
https://news.yahoo.com/state-dept-tells ... p_catchall
After 4 years of telling lies in the feeble attempt to tie Trump to Putin while contending his actions were treasonous, WHEN DOES THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL OF BIDEN BEGIN?
Did Trump EVER invite Putin to invade another sovereign country as Biden did on national TV?
Did any Trump relative EVER accept millions of dollars from Russia as Biden's druggie son did?
Did Trump EVER pay for the Russian oil pipeline as Biden did with US taxpayer money?
Did Trump EVER cut out the $100 million in military aid that we were about to send to Ukraine as Putin ordered Biden to do?
Is there a single brainless lib here that wants to explain how those outrageous actions are justified after spending years demanding Trump be impeached for the absurdly laughable story that Trump had hired hookers to piss on Obama's bed while he was in Moscow?
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
What were YOU doing there? Shoveling the snow?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Thursday..
With friends from college, and their kids.
He is a pediatric surgeon,, she was the 6th woman to be board certified a neurosurgeon in the US.
Their daughter is a fellow in pediatric surgery, her hubby is a bright light in cardiovascular surgery - both at the largest medical center in the world.
You?
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
What an exciting life you must lead! You don't even critique your own enjoyment of the candy for yourself or anyone else including Carlson, but you think it's incredibly insightful to pan how someone else expresses their opinion about the COMMERCIAL for a candy!Misty » 22 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Fox News host Tucker Carlson is infamous for his unusual pop culture rants, which often focus on inclusive marketing campaigns, framing corporate “wokeness” as a symbol of societal decline.
Carlson has tackled important issues such as Elmo’s opinions on BLM, and the supposed cancellation of Dr. Seuss, whose books continue to be massively popular.
Recently, Carlson was triggered by a redesign of the M&M cartoon characters used to market the candy.
The M&Ms are set to shift their focus, for some reason, reflecting a new era of diversity and inclusiveness, in a move that amused many Twitter users; the focus on Orange M&Ms “anxiety” proved a particularly popular joke.
Carlson, however, didn’t see the funny side; the Fox News host seemed particularly upset by the change seen in the two female M&Ms, as the green M&M has traded her knee-high boots for comfy trainers, while the brown M&M has shortened the height of her heels.
In one of the Fox News host’s most unhinged rants yet, Carlson condemned the chocolate-coated characters as “less sexy.”
Carlson went on to make some odd assumptions regarding the motive of M&M’s marketing team, passionately stating:
“M&M’s will not be satisfied until every last cartoon character is deeply unappealing and totally androgynous. Until the moment you wouldn’t want to have a drink with any one of them. That’s the goal.”
Carlson didn’t specify which M&M he’d like to share a drink with, instead going on to empathize with Orange M&M’s anxiety, speculating:
“Maybe he doesn’t like all the ugly new shoes he sees around him.”
Naturally, Carlson’s distaste for “androgynous” peanut candy in kitten heels didn’t escape the attention of Twitter users, who gleefully took the opportunity to mock the man’s unusual tastes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplac ... -sexy-mms/
MISTY: This is what passes for news on FOX News.
MISTY: Seems like Tucker prefers his peanut candy in kitten heels.
Here's my advice. Go play with your dog instead of watching a network you clearly despise, the next time you think there's any intrinsic value in exposing the subtilties deep within such a ridiculous topic.
You'll both be happier for it!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
What an incredibly banal and boring existence you must have!Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Some may be familiar with Sheilagh's habit of proclaiming herself "undefeated in challenges".
Overlooking, for the nonce, the patent ridiculousness of such talk coming from a running little cunny, perhaps it is a matter of definition.
Let's test the theory.
Here is the deal.
I can demonstrate, with no more than one post, that @Huey is a Useful Idiot of the very first order.
Any takers?
It's almost hard to imagine.
It's certainly clear that you haven't wasted YOUR life!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Are you and Simpleton Jack serious!? ONE THING?!? Are you two REALLY that ignorant, because it doesn't seem possible!leftist » 19 Jan 2022, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ “One thing I haven’t been able to do so far is get my Republican friends to get in the game at making things better in this country,” Biden said. He assailed the Rep party for its deference to Trump, wondering how “one man out of office could intimidate an entire party?”
Previewing a line of attack he'll use against the party in the midterms, he accused Republicans of lacking a policy core or a set of guiding principles. “What are Republicans for? Name me one thing they’re for.”
1) How about the LOWER TAXES Trump gave us while YOUR idiot is adding TRILLIONS in new taxes?
2) How about A SECURE BORDER, which YOUR idiot has left wide open to illegals, drug traffickers, and potential terrorists from around the world, some of whom have already been caught?
3) How about a SAFE, ORDERLY WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN, which Trump had put in place and which your idiot refused to follow in giving away Bagram Airbase to the Taliban BEFORE making damn certain that all our troops and allies were safely evacuated?
4) How about the negligible INFLATION RATE that Trump had, while YOUR idiot has given us the highest rate in 40 years?
5) How about LOW GAS PRICES, which were half what your idiot has brought us by stopping drilling and fracking, giving up the energy independence we had with Trump?
6) How about COMPLETING THE BORDER WALL which Trump had well underway, something that Americans OVERWHELMINGLY SUPPORT?
7) How about the LOWER CRIME AND MURDER RATES that Trump had by defending our police instead of supporting the rights of criminal looters, who are robbing and terrorizing local store owners?
8) How about the FREEDOM TO CHOOSE IF WE WANTED AN UNTESTED VACCINE, after decades of telling us what we do with our bodies is NOBODY ELSE'S BUSINESS?
9) How about INVESTIGATING THE ACTIONS OF PELOSI AND DC MAYOR BOWSER for having REFUSED Trump's offer to send in NG troops for the massive demonstration WHICH BOWSER GAVE THEM A PERMIT FOR?
10) How about having a president who is actually NOT A SENILE MENTAL PATIENT who can't remember important names of foreign leaders or his own cabinet, while his handlers run around crazily after his speeches, telling us what he REALLY meant to cover his *** every day?
11) How about having a leader who is UNIFYING THE COUNTRY as Biden promised, before calling anyone opposing his policies racists, terrorists, or unpatriotic?
12) How about having a president who SUPPORTS US BUSINESS instead of threatening THEM with arrest if they DARE to hire a worker who hasn't been vaccinated?
There's an even dozen, and we both know there would be plenty more if space permitted!
I'll await the response of BOTH of you political morons to hear you dolts trying to defend the ******* you stuck us with!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
I can't see how anyone who actually voted for this inept fossil could still be supporting him after what he and his slut VP has shown us in his first year! Ike is simply a prime example of how ignorant and gullible Democrats really are. Even after witnessing with their own two eyes how Biden has **** up the border being flooded with illegals, how he **** up the withdrawal from Afghanistan that go so many people killed, how he has shown absolutely no interest whatsoever in unifying the country while attacking Republicans and Trump supporters and calling his political adversaries unpatriotic, racists, white supremacists, and domestic terrorists for DARING to oppose his stupid radical left agenda. Especially after watching him stumble and stammer his way through every question asked of him, and having no concern with his obvious mental failings when he continually loses his train of thought and pausing interminably when he clearly forgets what he's saying or forgetting even the names of his own cabinet members. Do liberal dopes like him LIKE the highest inflation rates in 40 years? Do they LIKE not being energy independent any longer and paying double the price for gas and heating oil? Do they enjoy it when he gives the OK for Putin to invade Ukraine, pay for the Russian oil pipeline WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS while stopping our own pipeline construction? Do they LIKE watching hundreds of thousands of illegals taking jobs away from poor and middle class Americans while refusing to mandate the vaccine or mask requirements for illegals, while insulting the rest of us for not doing so no matter how valid a reason most people have?
Frankly, I'd contend that a box of rocks DOES have more brains than ANY idiot who still supports this turd! That box of rocks is completely harmless and a genius compared to him!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Do you even recognize the stupidity of your comments? You claim that Congress didn't do enough to stop future investment banking malfeasance, but the fact that we've had no such problems in the last 14 years belies that inference. And even if you don't accept that reality, why didn't Obama in his 8 years in office or Biden in HIS one year DO something about it themselves, while your own insane partisanship stupidly attempts to blame ONLY Republicans for the solution that only YOU see as evident? Didn't BOTH the Obama and Biden administrations have YEARS with full control of the Senate and House when Republicans couldn't stop ANY legislation they wanted?IkeBana » 21 Jan 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ The misdeeds of the grifters in the investment banking and loan paper markets are on you and your **** Republican politicians and your **** up deregulation of the banking industry.
The post 2008 meltown interventions that came out of the congress didn't do 5% of what was necessary to keep this **** from happening again. Dodd/Frank was a **** joke.
Time to view the reality outside of the ignorance you so happily swallow emanating from CNN and MSNBC, don't you think?
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Yeah yeah, we've all heard your idiotic rants for years over our "hideous monetary system" until we're bored to tears by it, which is nothing but a testament to your own failures in life to succeed under that system! Now explain why a left-wing dope like you believes that the federal war on drugs doesn't conform with the US Constitution's preamble, to "promote the general welfare" or use ICE to "insure domestic tranquility and provide for the common defense" of illegal drug traffickers within the country? And when you get through wrapping your tiny liberal brain around those facts, why don't you then explain what it was about the Trump foreign policy that you despise so greatly, while also submitting exactly how it is that you think the idiot you elected has improved upon that with his cozy ties to Russia, the country that paid his son millions and who he approved of and paid for THEIR oil pipeline while killing the US pipeline construction, AND by giving his willing acceptance of Putin's coming incursion into Ukraine? Is a dope like you going to try to compare Biden's actual words and actions to the lies you idiots told about Trump and RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA for 4 years?peepee » 21 Jan 2022, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ ...
...
...this from an orangemouthed supporter of the [unconstitutional] federal 'war on drugs', the hideous monetary system, 'our' hideous foreign policie$, etc. ad nauseam....
...do yourself a favor and stfu, trumptard!...
Let's see you go and explain THAT, *******, after which YOU YOURSELF are certainly encouraged mightily to shut the **** up!
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
OF COURSE the Defense Sec. didn't receive the Trump order to send in the National Guard! HE IS NOT ALLOWED BY LAW TO DO SO, WITHOUT the consent of either Pelosi or Bowser! And it's a lie that he did nothing for over 3 hours! Here are the statements he made on Twitter :Misty » 21 Jan 2022, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ They alone are responsible........
Are you not the least bit concerned that Trump's own acting SecDef told the January Sixth Committee that he never received any orders from Trump to send in the National Guard that day?
Or that Trump did nothing for 187 minutes to call off his goons while people were begging him to?
"Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement," Trump said on Twitter more than an hour after protesters breached a security cordon.
Thirty minutes later, Trump tweeted again, saying, “I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!”
And here's the timeline of those messages:
So once again, you've exposed how gullible you are to believe the lies of MSNBC and CNN.2:38 p.m.: Trump expresses support for Capitol Police and members of law enforcement, who had been overrun by rioters at the Capitol. He appeared to send this from the Oval Office as a Marine was stationed outside the office at the time of the tweet, typically indicating the president is inside.
“Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!”
3:13 p.m.: About 10 minutes after rioters are photographed on the Senate floor, Trump calls for peaceful protests.
Here is another message Trump sent in those first few hours of the riot:
"I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!" he tweeted.
So YES, PELOSI AND BOWSER WANTED A RIOT THEY COULD USE TO BLAME TRUMP FOR!
THEY ALONE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT!
And I'm STILL waiting for you to provide a plausible excuse why NEITHER OF THEM WANTED the additional security that was offered to THEM BY TRUMP, when they KNEW there were hundreds of thousands of protesters expected to attend that demonstration.
Let's see you come up with something reasonable, since you continue to deny they had ANY responsibility to do so!
Trump did ALL HE POSSIBLY COULD DO by telling the protesters SPECIFICALLY to "march peacefully" several times, easily proving your lies.
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
Yes, it was ALL PELOSI AND BOWSER'S FAULT! Can you explain why both of them refused to permit the National Guard troops that Trump offered them if it wasn't because they were hoping to see a riot they can blame Trump for?
So tell me what it is that you think Trump did illegally, and not just the idiotic accusations you heard on the Hate Trump Networks MSNBC & CNN? Didn't you learn your lesson from the past 5 years of them making up lies and phony stories about Trump that you gullible liberals believed?
Explain to me how that "plot to overturn the election" was ANY different than what Democrats did to Trump by impeaching him twice with no proof of the crimes they claimed they had, and how they used the Steele dossier that the Hillary campaign bought against him? And how do ignorant liberal believe that a group of unruly rioters could overturn an election when not one of them was armed and the DC police all had guns? Are you even aware that there were at least 7 Congressmen and women who similarly disavowed Trump's win in 2016 and attempted to have it overturned?:
I read about the Green Bay Sweep at your behest, and find nothing that could possibly prove Trump was guilty of ANY crime! They stated there was NOTHING illegal about him calling to inquire how many votes he had lost by in ANY state, and no question that there were MANY doubts about the vote count being fraudulent, when supervisors sent vote counters home, then had only Democrat vote counters resume through the night when the Biden vote count suddenly surged to impossible levels, ONLY in the swing states where Biden was behind. And when millions of people believe that the vote count was fraudulent, they have an obligation to present that evidence, which is precisely what they attempted to do while Democrats called it an "insurrection", and you gullible libs believed it.House Dems who challenged 2016 election results escalate fight with Republicans behind 2020 challenges
Fox News January 19, 2021
In January 2017, Reps. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., Barbara Lee, D-Calif., Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and Jim McGovern, D-Mass., all objected to electoral votes for Trump. Now nearly all of them have joined the chorus against those who objected to votes for Biden.This was a different attitude than the one Raskin had four years ago."I would love to challenge the Electoral College vote because our election was badly tainted by everything from cyber-sabotage by Vladimir Putin, to deliberate voter suppression by Republicans in numerous swing states," Raskin told the Baltimore Sun
-
-
- Posts: 2641
-
More **** as you grasp for straws! There is NO SUCH THING AS A "LEGALIZED LOAN SHARK". Loansharking is illegal, and that is NOT where your niece got her loan from. And the loans handed out in good faith have nothing whatsoever to do with any deregulation of the financial market, which you clearly have ZERO understanding about! Neither do you understand ANYTHING about the subprime mortgage market that bailed out the banks and was initiated by Barney Frank, Obama, and a few other Democrat Senators in office at that time. Naturally, a diehard ignorant lib like you knows only the **** your fed from the left-wing media, who don't care how stupid you look when you try to pass off what they tell you as accurate information!IkeBana » 21 Jan 2022, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps those who obediently paid off their loans were easy marks. Taken advantage of by legalized loan sharks peddling student loans who stayed in business because of Republicans and their chronic deregulation of financial markets. Which includes all the loan paper markets. And if you need a **** reminder of how bad this can get...I give you the 2008 investment banking meltdown, generated by the wildly speculative investment banking derivative products in the subprime mortgage loan market. All due to banking deregulation driven by the Republican party.
And I don't give a **** "how bad this can get"! If you took out a loan that you can't or refuse to pay back, the lender is well within his rights to go after your house or other property or garnishee your wages until it's paid back.
The fact is that you don't care a whit about anything that's unfair or unjust, as long as you can get away with legal stealing! If you did, you'd demand that those who repaid their loans as they agreed should ALSO be refunded their money, and I'll bet it will be taken to court by many of the people you're so happy to screw over, as long as you got yours!