I see you're still wandering around, littering...Nostradamus'omh » 28 Apr 2023, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑
this species population is divided genetically between 5 generation gaps of contracting DNA expanding numbers forward as long as great great grandchildren keep arriving one at a time.
Anyone wish to continue theorizing that isn't a universal constant like civilization does all the time?
I love that song
Merry Christmas.Nostradamus'omh » 17 Dec 2022, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑People is a group, I am just the only one describing actual life evolving in plain sight as it always has. Every reality guesses what else is possible because people trained to believe now isn't eternity, won't accept it when explained in every detail molecular migration has done and still doing universally going on now.
Nostradamus'omh » 13 Dec 2022, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑I adapt to the core of physical eternity sustaining eternal separation of active reproductions in this atmosphere specifically behaving as they are denying life in plain sight evolving equally timed apart here now.
You make a stupid remark like I am defenseless against anything is possible corruption of ancestral progression done historically since dawn of civilization manifesting destiny in rule of law punishing anyone being honest about life in plain sight?
I have been working Butterfly Effect psychologically on message boards for 16 years. you might say I know how to direct Karma throughout humanity's theaters of doubt regulating human behavior cradle to grave within the only 5 generation gaps left living inception to extinction of this species.
How deep does your reality touch instinctive awareness? Not very, since all you do is teach people to ignore life doesn't exceed the moment here.
I'd love to engage in an intellectual battle with you.Nostradamus'omh » 13 Dec 2022, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑I figured out a way to debunk all intellectual minds, thing is intellectual minds don't tolerate honesty and are protected by civilization's laws ordering compliance or else.
You really need to stay in your safe space of LO forum. There are persons in NHB that actually use their own brain rather than rely on historical social consensus.
I don't think you understand the Jones case lady.ScottMon » 17 Oct 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑Then why post? I'm making a point that Alex Jones didn't lose his 1st Amendment rights.