Oh, I get it.RayJJohnson » Today, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You say do I think they were there to help. I said no, THEY were there to nation build and I don't think nation building is helping.
No, the tranny you side with is a special case, fruity.
Whatever helps ya sleep, pookie. Your rhetorical question was asinine.RayJJohnson » Today, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ You are taking the contrary view just for the sake of being contrarian.
Link?
And there is your presentism, turd.
Oh, please, mister, get out of my head. How can you read me ike a book? Please stop.Prospero » Today, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑You wouldn't have even mentioned it but for my not bringing it up.
I really have no response to that insanity, fruitcake. The only thing I can agree with is that you sound like a squirrel on crack. You are quite coming apart at the seams.Prospero » Today, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑Here, "prospero" does not prosper, but literally assumes and regurgitates (though less competently) the arguments which have defeated him as if they were his own - or SEEMS to. I trust the dear reader to be as confused by zim's hysteria as I was, and recommend that they read the twaddle for themselves on the off chance that they might glean the sense that my read and re-read failed to apprehend.
Define "racist," ***-dicker.
Like when you made that claim to golfboy that a demoncrat had been indicted, and it was just made up, and rather than acknowledge error like a responsible poster, you breezed past it and doubled down stupidly?
A man is the room he is in, felcher.
The type that puts chinamen in camps?
But then, you don't know any. You have problems with definitions. Hell, you think girls have dicks, fruitloop. Taking YOUR definitions is something non-soys reject up front, ya retarded little girl.Prospero » Today, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ No FDR dem I know traffics in cheap shots and tawdry mudslinging as you do.
WOWZA! What a brilliant takedown!Prospero » Today, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ And the response, another right winger BRUTALLY destroyed:
viewtopic.php?p=2324132#p2324132
ROTFLMAO
The **** irony.golfboy » Yesterday, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑Your story is 8 months old, and he's not been indicted.Prospero » Yesterday, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, really? I guess that is why Dem Sen, Bob Menendez is under indictment
Bob Menendez: New Jersey Democratic senator under federal investigation again | CNN Politics
You really should adhere to that old adage; 'look before you shoot, lest you shoot yourself in the foot'.
You may now remove your foot from your mouth.
Let's see if you're man enough to apologize.
Of course, the state media will blame Russia and the homosexual community will believe it - skans and tai-one-on inclusive.Sumela » Yesterday, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ WaPost last year.....
Major General Andrey Kovalchuk admitted to the Washington Post last December that his side had previously planned to blow up part of the Kakhovka Dam as part of its Kherson Counteroffensive. It therefore seemed unthinkable that Kiev would ultimately do just that over half a year later and then gaslight that Moscow was to blame when the Mainstream Media itself earlier reported the existence of Ukraine’s terrorist plans after quoting the same official who bragged about them.
“Kovalchuk considered flooding the river. The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with a HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates at the Nova Kakhovka dam, making three holes in the metal to see if the Dnieper’s water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings but not flood nearby villages. The test was a success, Kovalchuk said, but the step remained a last resort. He held off.”
You cried when I picked on a spelling error. I see you hold yourself to a different standard.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I am, and I know a lot of FDR dems, and you are most certainly not one. You have not written anything in any of your replies that remotely comes anywhere near the ballpark of being an FDR Democrat. All you do is rant, rave, and call names. What kind of FDR Dem does that? Not any kind that I know.
You live in L.A. Pico and La Cienega (and you can't spell it? ) is close to Beverly Hills. So you are an FDR dem, and you can't spell? You are a phony.
What link?
You are utterly the dumbest democrat I've ever encountered. You are doorknob dumb.
You're a phony, a troll. You haven't the slightest clue as to what it means to be an FDR Democrat.
You haven't said a gawddamn thing of substance since I've encountered you on this forum.
All you have done is rant and rave and say NOTHING,
You are a PHONY.
Since I wouldn't let you keep ducking it, you decided to lie about it, eh, Sodomite Chaser? Okay, go ahead - tell your lies, and then I willl quote your leader in the United Anti-Sodomy Brigade, fruitcake.
Huh. Isn't that fraudulently intersting. Say more about that, pants of fire homophobe.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑FDR, as Assistant Secretary of the Navy did coincide with the Newport Sex Scandal in 1919, which involved entrapment of men alleged to be engaging in homosexual activities. However, characterizing FDR as personally persecuting gays might be a stretch - historical sources suggest that he approved the inquiry but was not directly involved in its execution.
Let's do that, jackass. Here is what FDR had to say: “I did it for the uplift of humanity and the Navy”Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You'll need to source this (okay, I see your link, I'll check it out) and let me look at what you are basing your conclusions on. But you have to factor in the prevailing attitudes at the time.
YOU are the one guilty of presentism, thinking your silliness quite mod and thinking opposition to it old fashioned. The very idea that there have not always been libertines and those who oppose them is presentist.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑You appear to be guilty of a phenomenon called "presentism."
Prospero » Yesterday, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑What, are you brain dead?
Anyone can support someone's policies posthumously.
what a **** moron.
Dear retarded man,Prospero » Yesterday, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ Many folks on the left say something like 'I'm an FDR democrat".
What are they saying? They are saying they support FDR's policies.
Well, I have been quite literally shoveling ****. But I'll dip in presently...Sumela » Yesterday, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes sir. I started a thread a few hours ago.
It seems to have not been important enough for any responses.
Then stop lying that you are an FDR Demcrat, you stupid ***.Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, hot shot. There is no friend of the LGBTQ community more than me. I lived in West Hollywood for 20 years.
Gave you a link, retard. Cannot force you to click it.Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ So, provide evidence of that lie.
You can't, it doesn't exist. So, on top of phony, you are lying phony.
I had rather thought you smart enough to suss that I used that one sentence, tongue in cheek, to incorporate every fallacy you accused me of. But I get it - AI was doing the accusing, not you. So the lazy **** that relied on AI - and likely did not bother even to READ the copy paste he did not orignate - naturally missed the humor and was stung by being called a "commie."Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Republicans call FDR dems 'communists', so how in holy hell, if you are an FDR dem, call me a 'communist'.?
Do you GENUINELY feel you need to explain the purpose of your sophomoric hypothetical, rube goldberg? Do you think explaining its obvious intention will render it more dignified and worthy of response?RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't even answer the question with out being butt hurt. It is a hypothetical that eliminates trying to take over land in Russia or the US. It is mean to show power against power and the neutral land is unimportant but you are so flipping obtuse it's silly.
"There to help" and actually "helping" are two different things, fruitcake.RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you said that "I" think they are there to help. I am only saying what the US government thought it was trying to do. I don't think it works, so how can they be helping?
Correct. YOU said they were there to nation build.
You SUPPORT them, stupid. You are the logical trans-appeaser to reach out TO, fruity.RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You talk about trannies a lot. Are you reaching out for help?
Just as you are an average trans culture warrior, fruitcake that sides with Biden and Pelosi.
So, impossible to happen and utterly irrelevant to the adult world and unworthy of respectful comment?RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a hypothetical that eliminates trying to take over land in Russia or the US.