-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Oh, I get it.RayJJohnson » Today, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You say do I think they were there to help. I said no, THEY were there to nation build and I don't think nation building is helping.
Building schools and dams and water projects and roads and electric plants and other aspects of a modern grid HURTS a country.
THAT'S where we disagree. I have been way off base in my critique, and you have my apology.
Okay, let us argue your REAL position, and let me stop (innocently, but harmfully) ascribing a false position to you.
Starting small with you, I am going to offer this gambit: Clean water running to homes and hospitals is helpful.
Now, I think you owe it to the readers to explain how clean water running to homes and hospitals is hurtful, per your thesis that nation building is harmful.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
No, the tranny you side with is a special case, fruity.
I'm just an FDR democrat - which makes me far more conservative than a progressive fella like you.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Whatever helps ya sleep, pookie. Your rhetorical question was asinine.RayJJohnson » Today, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ You are taking the contrary view just for the sake of being contrarian.
The very idea that anyone on this board is unaware that we spend more on hardware than the russians do on
E V E R Y T H I N G is almost as dumb as the naive certainty that these circumstances equate to an automatic win - which, in the realm of dummy posts, is just beneath the notion that folks owe an answer to a clearly rhetorical question.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Link?
I merely highlighted his policies and his attitudes. I did not "attack" him, you fool, as, BEING AN FDR DEMOCRAT, I agree with his positions, fruitcake.
And there is your presentism, turd.
You pretend that a man who knew his mind and knew his principles - a man who RAN AND FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED THE COUNTRY - was the waffling victim of quaint and antiquated mores; a veritable zelig to those around him: a victim of "the times."
We all know that were he not a lionized progressive of the past, you would be dismissing him as a DWM and calling him a racist. But you think it unwise to sling **** on a founding father of american liberalism, and so you engage in tawdry presentism, embracing his wisdom where it fits your hand-me-down template and pretending the things that don't are a result of handlebar mustaches and ostrich feathers in ladies' caps - a mere fashion foible.
You're an idiot - and a presentist.
Oh, please, mister, get out of my head. How can you read me ike a book? Please stop.Prospero » Today, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑You wouldn't have even mentioned it but for my not bringing it up.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, I watch you dick suckers trash the **** WESTERN CANNON and refer to its brilliant authors as DWMs, and you think me unaware of presentism, you **** fruitcake?
It's your stock in trade, fruitcake. It's what you people DO. It's ALL you people do, besides lying and projecting - which is precisely what you were doing when you ascribed YOUR practice to me, midwit.
I really have no response to that insanity, fruitcake. The only thing I can agree with is that you sound like a squirrel on crack. You are quite coming apart at the seams.Prospero » Today, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑Here, "prospero" does not prosper, but literally assumes and regurgitates (though less competently) the arguments which have defeated him as if they were his own - or SEEMS to. I trust the dear reader to be as confused by zim's hysteria as I was, and recommend that they read the twaddle for themselves on the off chance that they might glean the sense that my read and re-read failed to apprehend.
You might want to ask AI to step in, Pookie Bear.
You appear as one of those fellows who comes to drain the swamp and then encounters alligators.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Define "racist," ***-dicker.
Like when you made that claim to golfboy that a demoncrat had been indicted, and it was just made up, and rather than acknowledge error like a responsible poster, you breezed past it and doubled down stupidly?
Or like when you claimed to be a 100% FDR Democrat, supporting his policies down the line, and THEN claimed that you were a "good friend" (wink wink) of the penis puffing "community"?
No, gay boi - I'm not like you.
A man is the room he is in, felcher.
The type that puts chinamen in camps?
But then, you don't know any. You have problems with definitions. Hell, you think girls have dicks, fruitloop. Taking YOUR definitions is something non-soys reject up front, ya retarded little girl.Prospero » Today, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ No FDR dem I know traffics in cheap shots and tawdry mudslinging as you do.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
WOWZA! What a brilliant takedown!Prospero » Today, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ And the response, another right winger BRUTALLY destroyed:
viewtopic.php?p=2324132#p2324132
ROTFLMAO
It's almost like you DIDN'T **** and golfboy DIDN'T expose your stupidity! WOWZA!
And it's amost like you DIDN'T present more evidence for his thesis! SHAZAAM!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxQ-Ltfs9ds
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
The **** irony.golfboy » Yesterday, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑Your story is 8 months old, and he's not been indicted.Prospero » Yesterday, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, really? I guess that is why Dem Sen, Bob Menendez is under indictment
Bob Menendez: New Jersey Democratic senator under federal investigation again | CNN Politics
You really should adhere to that old adage; 'look before you shoot, lest you shoot yourself in the foot'.
You may now remove your foot from your mouth.
Let's see if you're man enough to apologize.
That was brutal.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]
You base this on what evidence?[/quote]
Since I wouldn't let you keep ducking it, you decided to lie about it, eh, Sodomite Chaser? Okay, go ahead - tell your lies, and then I willl quote your leader in the United Anti-Sodomy Brigade, fruitcake.
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]FDR, as Assistant Secretary of the Navy did coincide with the Newport Sex Scandal in 1919, which involved entrapment of men alleged to be engaging in homosexual activities. However, characterizing FDR as personally persecuting gays might be a stretch - historical sources suggest that he approved the inquiry but was not directly involved in its execution.[/quote]
Huh. Isn't that fraudulently intersting. Say more about that, pants of fire homophobe. [img]./images/smilies/smile.gif[/img]
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]
You'll need to source this (okay, I see your link, I'll check it out) and let me look at what you are basing your conclusions on. But you have to factor in the prevailing attitudes at the time.[/quote]
Let's do that, jackass. Here is what FDR had to say: “I did it for the uplift of humanity and the Navy”
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]You appear to be guilty of a phenomenon called "presentism."[/quote]
YOU are the one guilty of presentism, thinking your silliness quite mod and thinking opposition to it old fashioned. The very idea that there have not always been libertines and those who oppose them is presentist.
The Weimar Republic was captive to no such attitudes as you drone on about and mischaracterize as anachronisms - though Weimar existed in the same time. The Weimar was quite libertine. The issue between permissives and anti-permissives is not limited by chronology, as your presentism leads you to believe. It went on millennia before. It's going on NOW. It's oh so tony and modern.
Between 1919 and 1933, the first mass-market periodicals for gays, lesbians, and what were then called "transvestites" were published in the Weimar Republic. This was in the same time frame when FDR was stringin' up queers. So, it's not about the PERIOD. It's about FDR's belief system. He wasn't being tony - he was being himself. These were his principles on display. He believed himself responsible to guard public morals, against the likelihood that the failure of public morals would lead to chaos, which chaos would then lead to a strongman.
The first open and legal gay political action committees, the League for Human Rights and the German Friendship Society, were founded in the Weimar. They pushed the notion that there were people with male bodies and female souls - what today you people push as "transgenders." Germany had a swinging sexual liberty that pervaded society. It was quite the party. Then came the hangover, in the person of a fellow named adolf hitler. He sent the revelers to camp.
FDR not only saved capitalism from the enraged masses. He also saved America from fascism - by preventing precisely what you and your kind have accomplished: the debasement of public morals to the point that children are being manipulated by perverts on the state payrol..
No, presentist. You don't get away with dismissing your leader's anti-homo positions as the fault of his ERA, when his ERA followed the Roarin' 20s and coexisted with the Weimar Republic. Men were not more naive in those days. They saw as clearly as we do today the issues that confront humanity and society. FDR was not a victim of his time. He did not have quaint ideas. His anti-homo stance was no tic of his time period. He viewed *** as a danger to society. And you agree with him to some precise extent. Let me remember what you said... Oh, yeah. [u]100%[/u].
Homophobe.
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=607]GeorgeWashington[/url] [size=85]Jun 06, 2023[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2324060#p2324060]Go to original post on Jun 06, 2023 9:12pm[/url]
You base this on what evidence?[/quote]
Since I wouldn't let you keep ducking it, you decided to lie about it, eh, Sodomite Chaser? Okay, go ahead - tell your lies, and then I willl quote your leader in the United Anti-Sodomy Brigade, fruitcake.
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]FDR, as Assistant Secretary of the Navy did coincide with the Newport Sex Scandal in 1919, which involved entrapment of men alleged to be engaging in homosexual activities. However, characterizing FDR as personally persecuting gays might be a stretch - historical sources suggest that he approved the inquiry but was not directly involved in its execution.[/quote]
Huh. Isn't that fraudulently intersting. Say more about that, pants of fire homophobe. [img]./images/smilies/smile.gif[/img]
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]
You'll need to source this (okay, I see your link, I'll check it out) and let me look at what you are basing your conclusions on. But you have to factor in the prevailing attitudes at the time.[/quote]
Let's do that, jackass. Here is what FDR had to say: “I did it for the uplift of humanity and the Navy”
[quote="Prospero" post_id=2323952 time=1686095155 user_id=5270]You appear to be guilty of a phenomenon called "presentism."[/quote]
YOU are the one guilty of presentism, thinking your silliness quite mod and thinking opposition to it old fashioned. The very idea that there have not always been libertines and those who oppose them is presentist.
The Weimar Republic was captive to no such attitudes as you drone on about and mischaracterize as anachronisms - though Weimar existed in the same time. The Weimar was quite libertine. The issue between permissives and anti-permissives is not limited by chronology, as your presentism leads you to believe. It went on millennia before. It's going on NOW. It's oh so tony and modern.
Between 1919 and 1933, the first mass-market periodicals for gays, lesbians, and what were then called "transvestites" were published in the Weimar Republic. This was in the same time frame when FDR was stringin' up queers. So, it's not about the PERIOD. It's about FDR's belief system. He wasn't being tony - he was being himself. These were his principles on display. He believed himself responsible to guard public morals, against the likelihood that the failure of public morals would lead to chaos, which chaos would then lead to a strongman.
The first open and legal gay political action committees, the League for Human Rights and the German Friendship Society, were founded in the Weimar. They pushed the notion that there were people with male bodies and female souls - what today you people push as "transgenders." Germany had a swinging sexual liberty that pervaded society. It was quite the party. Then came the hangover, in the person of a fellow named adolf hitler. He sent the revelers to camp.
FDR not only saved capitalism from the enraged masses. He also saved America from fascism - by preventing precisely what you and your kind have accomplished: the debasement of public morals to the point that children are being manipulated by perverts on the state payrol..
No, presentist. You don't get away with dismissing your leader's anti-homo positions as the fault of his ERA, when his ERA followed the Roarin' 20s and coexisted with the Weimar Republic. Men were not more naive in those days. They saw as clearly as we do today the issues that confront humanity and society. FDR was not a victim of his time. He did not have quaint ideas. His anti-homo stance was no tic of his time period. He viewed *** as a danger to society. And you agree with him to some precise extent. Let me remember what you said... Oh, yeah. [u]100%[/u].
Homophobe.
[hr]
[size=200][b][color=#aaaaaa]1[/color] Nomination[/b][/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=607]GeorgeWashington[/url] [size=85]Jun 06, 2023[/size]
[url=https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2324060#p2324060]Go to original post on Jun 06, 2023 9:12pm[/url]
Last edited by Cannonpointer on 06 Jun 2023, 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: GeorgeWashington nominated this post
Reason: GeorgeWashington nominated this post
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Of course, the state media will blame Russia and the homosexual community will believe it - skans and tai-one-on inclusive.Sumela » Yesterday, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ WaPost last year.....
Major General Andrey Kovalchuk admitted to the Washington Post last December that his side had previously planned to blow up part of the Kakhovka Dam as part of its Kherson Counteroffensive. It therefore seemed unthinkable that Kiev would ultimately do just that over half a year later and then gaslight that Moscow was to blame when the Mainstream Media itself earlier reported the existence of Ukraine’s terrorist plans after quoting the same official who bragged about them.
“Kovalchuk considered flooding the river. The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with a HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates at the Nova Kakhovka dam, making three holes in the metal to see if the Dnieper’s water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings but not flood nearby villages. The test was a success, Kovalchuk said, but the step remained a last resort. He held off.”
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
You cried when I picked on a spelling error. I see you hold yourself to a different standard.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I am, and I know a lot of FDR dems, and you are most certainly not one. You have not written anything in any of your replies that remotely comes anywhere near the ballpark of being an FDR Democrat. All you do is rant, rave, and call names. What kind of FDR Dem does that? Not any kind that I know.
You live in L.A. Pico and La Cienega (and you can't spell it? ) is close to Beverly Hills. So you are an FDR dem, and you can't spell? You are a phony.
What link?
You are utterly the dumbest democrat I've ever encountered. You are doorknob dumb.
You're a phony, a troll. You haven't the slightest clue as to what it means to be an FDR Democrat.
You haven't said a gawddamn thing of substance since I've encountered you on this forum.
All you have done is rant and rave and say NOTHING,
You are a PHONY.
I do that, too - but I hold myself to a HIGHER standard - not a lower one.
I do not live at Pico and La Seeyanigga. I LIVED there - I do not live there. Where I live, I can have dogs and a garden without paying millions for a home.
And I never declared myself a democrat, fruitcake. I said I was an FDR DEMOCRAT. I might as well have called myself a Whig, dummy. Your presentism knows no bounds. And you CLEARLY know jack **** about FDR, you idiot.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Since I wouldn't let you keep ducking it, you decided to lie about it, eh, Sodomite Chaser? Okay, go ahead - tell your lies, and then I willl quote your leader in the United Anti-Sodomy Brigade, fruitcake.
Huh. Isn't that fraudulently intersting. Say more about that, pants of fire homophobe.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑FDR, as Assistant Secretary of the Navy did coincide with the Newport Sex Scandal in 1919, which involved entrapment of men alleged to be engaging in homosexual activities. However, characterizing FDR as personally persecuting gays might be a stretch - historical sources suggest that he approved the inquiry but was not directly involved in its execution.
Let's do that, jackass. Here is what FDR had to say: “I did it for the uplift of humanity and the Navy”Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You'll need to source this (okay, I see your link, I'll check it out) and let me look at what you are basing your conclusions on. But you have to factor in the prevailing attitudes at the time.
YOU are the one guilty of presentism, thinking your silliness quite mod and thinking opposition to it old fashioned. The very idea that there have not always been libertines and those who oppose them is presentist.Prospero » Yesterday, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑You appear to be guilty of a phenomenon called "presentism."
The Weimar Republic was captive to no such attitudes as you drone on about and mischaracterize as anachronisms - though Weimar existed in the same time. The Weimar was quite libertine. The issue between permissives and anti-permissives is not limited by chronology, as your presentism leads you to believe. It went on millennia before. It's going on NOW. It's oh so tony and modern.
Between 1919 and 1933, the first mass-market periodicals for gays, lesbians, and what were then called "transvestites" were published in the Weimar Republic. This was in the same time frame when FDR was stringin' up queers. So, it's not about the PERIOD. It's about FDR's belief system. He wasn't being tony - he was being himself. These were his principles on display. He believed himself responsible to guard public morals, against the likelihood that the failure of public morals would lead to chaos, which chaos would then lead to a strongman.
The first open and legal gay political action committees, the League for Human Rights and the German Friendship Society, were founded in the Weimar. They pushed the notion that there were people with male bodies and female souls - what today you people push as "transgenders." Germany had a swinging sexual liberty that pervaded society. It was quite the party. Then came the hangover, in the person of a fellow named adolf hitler. He sent the revelers to camp.
FDR not only saved capitalism from the enraged masses. He also saved America from fascism - by preventing precisely what you and your kind have accomplished: the debasement of public morals to the point that children are being manipulated by perverts on the state payrol..
No, presentist. You don't get away with dismissing your leader's anti-homo positions as the fault of his ERA, when his ERA followed the Roarin' 20s and coexisted with the Weimar Republic. Men were not more naive in those days. They saw as clearly as we do today the issues that confront humanity and society. FDR was not a victim of his time. He did not have quaint ideas. His anti-homo stance was no tic of his time period. He viewed *** as a danger to society. And you agree with him to some precise extent. Let me remember what you said... Oh, yeah. 100%.
Homophobe.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Prospero » Yesterday, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑What, are you brain dead?
Anyone can support someone's policies posthumously.
what a **** moron.
Dear retarded man,Prospero » Yesterday, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ Many folks on the left say something like 'I'm an FDR democrat".
What are they saying? They are saying they support FDR's policies.
FDR persecuted gays as Assistant Secretary of the Navy and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). He literally set honey traps targeting them, and when questioned why, he responded: “I did it for the uplift of humanity and the Navy.” After the sting rounded up a score of gay men, he put them in solitary for more than a hundred days before they were officially charged with sodomy and “scandalous conduct.”
And let me save you some embarrassment. He did NOT cool off on the topic during his presidency. You know - the presidency whose policies you claim to support, research guy?
Thank you for standing with me against the scourge of sodomy, fruitcake.
Oh - here's that link, Destroyer of Sodomites: https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/fdrs ... ent-sting/
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Well, I have been quite literally shoveling ****. But I'll dip in presently...Sumela » Yesterday, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes sir. I started a thread a few hours ago.
It seems to have not been important enough for any responses.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Then stop lying that you are an FDR Demcrat, you stupid ***.Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, hot shot. There is no friend of the LGBTQ community more than me. I lived in West Hollywood for 20 years.
I lived at pico and la sienega - kosher canyon. doesn't make me a friend to the doily-hats.
Gave you a link, retard. Cannot force you to click it.Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ So, provide evidence of that lie.
You can't, it doesn't exist. So, on top of phony, you are lying phony.
I had rather thought you smart enough to suss that I used that one sentence, tongue in cheek, to incorporate every fallacy you accused me of. But I get it - AI was doing the accusing, not you. So the lazy **** that relied on AI - and likely did not bother even to READ the copy paste he did not orignate - naturally missed the humor and was stung by being called a "commie."Prospero » Yesterday, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Republicans call FDR dems 'communists', so how in holy hell, if you are an FDR dem, call me a 'communist'.?
FFS. Who but retards accuses people of being commies anymore, ya flamboyant pinko?
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Do you GENUINELY feel you need to explain the purpose of your sophomoric hypothetical, rube goldberg? Do you think explaining its obvious intention will render it more dignified and worthy of response?RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You can't even answer the question with out being butt hurt. It is a hypothetical that eliminates trying to take over land in Russia or the US. It is mean to show power against power and the neutral land is unimportant but you are so flipping obtuse it's silly.
We spend double on military alone each year what the russians spend on their ENTIRE government. And we have been doing this for decades. Even with the people who own your brain ripping us off, one certainly HOPES that if a nine year old girl's world view ever came to fruition and we could ignore every border and meet at an equidistant location for a head to head fight without any consideration for trans-generalship, political constraints, supply lines, logistics, espionage, or terrain, then america's ****, being shinier, would prevail in the Battle of Gaylandia.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
"There to help" and actually "helping" are two different things, fruitcake.RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you said that "I" think they are there to help. I am only saying what the US government thought it was trying to do. I don't think it works, so how can they be helping?
Contrary to your retar ted ***-ertion, they were NOT THERE TO HELP (or, "nation-build," you retard).
Their purpose was plunder and blooding their armies, you **** dummy tranny supporter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqHzlNHl0Xo
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Correct. YOU said they were there to nation build.
Or, help - dum-bass.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
You SUPPORT them, stupid. You are the logical trans-appeaser to reach out TO, fruity.RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You talk about trannies a lot. Are you reaching out for help?
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
Just as you are an average trans culture warrior, fruitcake that sides with Biden and Pelosi.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 15249
-
So, impossible to happen and utterly irrelevant to the adult world and unworthy of respectful comment?RayJJohnson » Yesterday, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a hypothetical that eliminates trying to take over land in Russia or the US.
Got it - thanks for the update.
And here I was, just going on gut instinct when I blew my nose on the shirt of your stupid question.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me