shintao said:

Technocrat » 27 Jul 2014 2:51 am » wrote:There is a recent story in the news about a nurse who claimed Ebola was a coverup for government experiments. It just goes to show that being a nurse doesn't mean you're smart. Or sane. If people that stupid can be a nurse...

Most of the time I have to put the IV in myself, those nurses like bed pan missed college when they were there. I guess they thought just attending classes was good enough.

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 29 Jul 2014 7:27 pm » wrote: Market systems AKA capitalism=freedom

Socialism=slavery to the state

THEY ARE FREE!!!

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 29 Jul 2014 6:01 pm » wrote: What are you??? A complete **** RETARD???? Economic freedom is the right of every human to control his or her own labor and property..... and you countered the definition with an argument against POLITICAL FREEDOM....

You get your debating tactics from Dr. Pot head?

This **** face can't read??

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 29 Jul 2014 5:46 am » wrote: If you have a complaint with how the economists of the Heritage Foundation rank the countries, perhaps you should file a formal grievance. I'm sure they'll take you just as seriously as we have!

The village idiot expels gas from his intelligence orifice ***!!!!!

According to his cult member heritage, they give the definition of economic freedom, so pay close attention to their propaganda lies.

What is economic freedom?
Economic freedom is the fundamental right of every human to control his or her own labor and property. In an economically free society, individuals are free to work, produce, consume, and invest in any way they please. In economically free societies, governments allow labor, capital and goods to move freely, and refrain from coercion or constraint of liberty beyond the extent necessary to protect and maintain liberty itself. http://www.heritage.org/index/about

Now lets look at reality, something assboy is unable to do on his drugs.

Fear of Authority
A survey by NUS in 2001 showed that 88% of the undergraduates had felt there were barriers that prevented them from entering politics, including the fear of authorities. One had remarked that ‘Politics in Singapore is a taboo topic’.
The government in Singapore has broad powers to limit citizens' rights and to inhibit political opposition. In 2014, Singapore was ranked 150th out of 175 nations by Reporters Without Borders in the Worldwide Press Freedom Index. Freedom in the World 2014 ranked Singapore 4 out of 7 for political freedom, and 4 out of 7 for civil liberties (where 1 is the most free), with an overall ranking of "partly free".

So much for assboy having and credibility along with the lying Heritage link!!!

shintao said:

RichClem » 25 Jul 2014 6:53 am » wrote:

RichClem » 25 Jul 2014 10:27 am wrote: ~ "There are sources all over the internet. Don't blame us if you're too lazy to read them." ~

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:20 pm » wrote: You **** RETARDS haven't provided ANY evidence you have actual gainful employment or any education to speak of. Do THAT FIRST, and THEN I'll be perfectly happy to make fun of you LOSERS.

I'm a BSN RN and licensed in two states. That IS real nursing, *******.

OK, lets see your evidence druggie.

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 6:09 pm » wrote: Do WHAT, drunk?

Try to **** the nurses out of their union pedophile druggie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_9SE0F7uP4

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 23 Jul 2014 5:57 pm » wrote: We fill out treatment plans freestyle, dispatcher. We enter admission data into a computer....

It must suck to be such a loser as to ridicule one of the most respected and honorable professions out there, nursing.

Hmm, then why did the right do that?

shintao said:

golfboy » 23 Jul 2014 12:53 pm » wrote: ^^ This moron claims the Singapore government "owns" 30% of the market, and somehow, this makes their system of government "socialist".
The absolute ignorance is stunning. I'm amazed this idiot can remember to breathe without being told.

Goofy trying to say something without knowing what the **** he is bleating about, like the typical con sheeple. Got something to say *******, or are you here to suck a bucket of Liberal ****?

shintao said:

golfboy » 23 Jul 2014 12:06 pm » wrote: Wow. It's stunning how ignorant liberals are about economic systems.

Amazing what a dumb **** you are about economic systems. How do you get by, on Jesus?? Take Lunarchit there claiming Greece is a socialist country!! Defies the imagination!!

shintao said:

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 11:26 am » wrote: The secondary definition of Socialism which I quoted and you have cut and pasted, is government controlling an economy via vast regulation.

I accept two definitions of Socialism, count 'em, 2. Government ownership and government control via extensive law and regulation.

What, when you get past one, you can't count?

Naah, you're just lying as usual.

No you dumb ****, that is capitalism!!! The US government owns your property dumb ****, you only rent it when you are paying taxes on it. Stop paying and they will take it away from you ****~~~

shintao said:

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 11:20 am » wrote: Speaking of psychotics, look who shows up.

How is Socialist Greece doing, moonbat?

How is Socialist Spain doing?

Socialist France?

Speaking of pedophiles, and one respond with a post~~ You dumb ****, Greece is a capitalist nation. Private schooling huh?? Further dumb ****, why worry about Spain or France? Worry about the greatest **** capitalist failure in the entire Universe you are **** in. What a dumb **** to even raise a question about another country. LMAO!!

Greece, ... was always a Capitalist state, functioning under the rules of free market economy.

shintao said:

RichClem » 23 Jul 2014 10:32 am » wrote: There need to be a few simple laws to govern those who engage in any kind of business.

But there are 10's of thousand of pages of them to the point no ordinary citizen or small businessman can possibly follow them.

Crushing business activity and making felons out of people doing business in what they think is a legal manner.

Further, Big Business uses its influence to crush competitors, to rig the game in its favor, to immunize itself against prosecution.

Was John Corzine ever indicted for illegally diverting 100's of millions of dollars of client funds into his private money losing schemes? No, of course not.

But anti-Obama Gibson Guitar was raided at gunpoint over a paperwork dispute and apparent legal business practice.

Wake the f*** up.

Laws are made after the fact, not before the fact, and they must cover every harm, hence so many regulations. It is what makes a socialist system superior to Capitalism.

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 19 Jul 2014 2:53 am » wrote: It's a GREAT definition. Basically, any country with private property rights is not socialist, *******.

Only in the sense of the means of production, resources and equipment that create wealth. dumb ****. Personal property like homes, cars, etc. belong to you, even more so than they do in America. You never own you home in America, you only rent it with taxes. Don't pay the rent (taxes) and your *** is out and a new renter moves in who will pay the taxes.

shintao said:

littlehawk12 » 18 Jul 2014 3:11 pm » wrote:Cannonhomo really doesn't care what economic system is used as long as the handouts keep coming.

Says the turd in the fish bowl who gets government handouts and has his family on welfare!!! LMAO!!

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 19 Jul 2014 12:44 am » wrote: Yes, none of what I mentioned is socialism. Anything else, *******?

Yeah pig boy, A market economy based on supply and demand with no government control. A completely free market is an idealized form of a market economy where buyers and sellers are allowed to transact freely based on a mutual agreement on price without state intervention in the form of taxes, subsidies or regulation. America is NOT free market, you never seen a free market, so shut your **** face!!!!!!!!!

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 18 Jul 2014 6:09 pm » wrote: WHAT is socialism, RETARD?

well idiot it isn't free market *******, and neither is America dumb ****~~~

Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy,[
1][
2] as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.[
3][
4] "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[
5] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.[
6] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.[
7]
A socialist economic system is based on the organisational precept of production for use, meaning the production of goods and services to directly satisfy economic demand and human needs where objects are valued based on their use-value or utility, as opposed to being structured upon the accumulation of capital and production for profit.[
8] In the traditional conception of a socialist economy, coordination, accounting and valuation would be performed in kind (using physical quantities), by a common physical magnitude, or by a direct measure of labour-time in place of financial calculation.[
9][
10] On distribution of output there have been two proposals, one which is based on the principle of to each according to his contribution and another on the principle of from each according to his ability, to each according to his need. The advisability, feasibility and exact methods of resource allocation and valuation are the subject of the socialist calculation debate.
The socialist political movement includes a diverse array of political philosophies. Core dichotomies within the socialist movement include the distinction between reformism and revolutionary socialism and between state socialism and libertarian socialism. State socialism calls for the nationalisation of the means of production as a strategy for implementing socialism, while libertarian socialists generally place their hopes in decentralized means of direct democracy such as libertarian municipalism, citizens' assemblies, trade unions, and workers' councils[
11] coming from a general anti-authoritarian stance.[
12][
13][
14][
15][
16][
17][
18] Democratic socialism highlights the central role of democratic processes and political systems and is usually contrasted with non-democratic political movements that advocate socialism.[
19] Some socialists have adopted the causes of other social movements, such as environmentalism, feminism and liberalism.[
20]
Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society. The revival of republicanism in the American Revolution of 1776 and the egalitarian values introduced by the French Revolution of 1789 gave rise to socialism as a distinct political movement. In the early 19th century, "socialism" referred to any concern for the social problems of capitalism irrespective of the solutions to those problems. However, by the late 19th century, "socialism" had come to signify opposition to capitalism and advocacy for an alternative post-capitalist system based on some form of social ownership.[
21] During this time, German philosopher Karl Marx and his collaborator Friedrich Engels published works criticizing the utopian aspects of contemporary socialist trends and applied a materialist understanding of socialism as a phase of development which will come about through social revolution instigated by escalating and conflicting class relationships within capitalism.[
22] Alongside this there appeared other tendencies such as anarchism, revolutionary syndicalism, social-democracy, Marxism–Leninism and democratic socialism as well as the confluence of socialism with anti-imperialist and anti-racist struggles around the world. The socialist movement came to be the most influential worldwide movement and political-economic worldview of the 20th century.[
23] Today, socialist parties and ideas remain a political force with varying degrees of power and influence in all continents leading national governments in many countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
That help you *******?

shintao said:

Str8tEdge » 18 Jul 2014 5:35 am » wrote:So do we..... Medicare, Medicaid, VA, Social Security, public schools, subsidized state colleges, student loans..... Does that make us socialist, RETARD?

Subsidized business, energy, etc. I say it does, we just don't do socialism very good yet, and you are lulled into your sleep mode a lil early in the day.

shintao said:

golfboy » 14 Jul 2014 8:02 pm » wrote:Carter ran our economy into the ground. He inherited a booming economy and drove it into the ground:
1976 5.4%
1977 4.6%
1978 5.6%
1979 3.2%
1980 -0.2%
Fed raised rate to 20%. GDP dropped 7.9% in Q2. Fed lowered rate to 10% by August to boost economy, then raised it to 20% to fight 12.5% inflation. Iran oil embargo.

Carter's Presidency is best summed up in two words: Misery Index.
But luckily for Carter, no one calls him the Worst President Ever anymore. Not since Obama.

SO George W. Bush, 1.6% (previously 1.7%) WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO George H.W. Bush, 2.1% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
Gerald Ford, 2.2%
SO Dwight Eisenhower, 2.5% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO Richard Nixon, 3.0% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO Jimmy Carter, 3.2% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO Ronald Reagan, 3.5% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO Bill Clinton, 3.8% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
SO Lyndon B. Johnson, 5.0% WAS IN COMPLETE MISERY~~~~~~~~~
AND John F. Kennedy, 5.4% WAS FEELING RIGHT & UPTIGHT~~~~~~~~~~~~~

But was Carter the worst President for GDP? No you **** fool!!! Read it and weep!!! bush brothers were idiot~~~

shintao said:

Huey » 09 May 2014 6:09 am » wrote: Entrepenership is not dwindling because of regulation written by wall street. Expansion is non existent not because of the same. 93 million people are not out of work because of the ghost regulation you allude to. It is because of regulation pushed, talked about and signed into law over the last decade. It is because of the cost these regulations impose on people.

wtf did you say?