User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
Editing for clarity is not something I invented, son. Nor did YOU inven straining at a gnat. It's all been done before.

I see,
Making things look like they're not is called "clarity" now

Got it
Well, I better be going before I have to start taking notes on internet deception,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
He was talkin to Karl, for posting his number. Internet stupid. Stop with the friendly fire. You're still upset over the gang bang...
No ****, you **** moron
And I asked him to use that number to get Karl's mom's maiden name

If you go ten minutes without acting stupid, does your head blow up?

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
There was ONE POST between yours and his. ONE.
Then WHY did you make it seem like GW quoted me?

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cedarswamp » wrote:
Exactly what I meant by internet stupid, anyone is 95 cents away from ALL of your personal info.
Prove it
Use that info to get me his mother's maiden name,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
There was ONE POST between yours and his. ONE.

Says the guy who is always critisizing me for not making it clear who I am talking to

You're right though.
I'm not going to hold a position only to use it to undermine the trust that position involves
I am too honorable, too honest, too loyal for that
I will quit a guy and THEN **** him over, but I won't use my position only to do the ****

Thanks for the lesson
I'll keep it in mind,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:I posted the quote in question - the one where you announced your intention to run back to david and cry date rape, you little hussy. Look up a few posts.

Better yet, here. Have at it:
I find your quote to be deceiving
If GW had quoted me when he posted the link to your profile, I probably would have figured it out

Those posts wouldn't quote for me in my earlier post
We'll see if they quote now,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
If you are talking about the post where Chuck flipflopped, I was correct. It is here, in this thread, at the bottom of page 11:
That's it?


That post is my so-called "flipflop", the reason I was suddenly unfit to administer this site and talk to on the phone?
Because I asked a couple friends to knock off the flagrant and shameless spamming and soliciting that I allowed to go on all day?
Well, I am guilty as charged then,,,,


**Why won't that thing quote?

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:
The title and first post of this thread, same as the rest of us.

Up until then, I was under the impression that this was also a temporary layover when the other was in the shop for repairs.
And I was under the impression that it was just Cannon's opinion/mission, whatever

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:No he **** you when you posted up your true feelings on LF.org as soon as it went back up. Strangely, I can't find the post you made on LF.org stating what you had failed to reveal here (I suspect it's been deleted but I may be looking on the wrong thread). The statement which revealed that, though the rest of us were thinking long term, you'd had cold feet the whole time. When the CEO of a company joins his competitor, no one expects the competitor to hang on to him when he can't cut his ties with his old company.
Cannon told me it was on THIS site, but he hasn't produced it, dispite my request
Maybe you could do me the courtesy?
If he said that he was wrong or confused about where he'd seen it. It was on the .org site. I was just back there trying to find it but I no longer can. The .org site hadn't been up long when cannonpointer went on and began wooing members over here. A few came over when the site went down again in short order.[/quote]

Did you try searching my posts?

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:You followed up his post by claiming that he was wrong. That this site was never meant to be a permanent fixture.

Could've fooled me. Did fool me. I really thought you were as committed as the rest of us Chuck. Not that I cared whether or not you were but I knew cannonpointer and GW did and for what it's worth, I really like them.
Like Cannon said, miscommunication, I guess


greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:When I signed on here the next morning and saw that cannon had been made forum admin and you no longer had a title below your avatar, it wasn't difficult to work out the math. GW saw the post too. Reacted as I had, as would be expected.

Personally, I don't care if you're here or there or anywhere. But where ever you are, you can at least admit that there was justification for stripping you of your site administrator badge and acknowledge that you led us all to believe you wanted this site to replace the dotorg site.
I suppose my issue was the lack of communication about it, both before and after
I thought, still think in fact, that it was at east worth a phone call

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:




Did George know that? Right up until the dotorg site came back up?
Yes Ma'am
As I said, I was working on creatig a nonLib group and a group/section for teacher when it happened, all with the blessings of Cannon and GW

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:
So you had no clue that the intent had changed when cannonpointer started this thread over a week ago?
Like I said, I assumed/thought/whatever that this was just Cannon pontificating

I still think that the way things worked out it looks as if it was all planned that way
The steal that is, not my personal involvement

This place was set up to steal from the original and that's exactly what is happening

Throughout all of this, no one is denying that simple fact,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

The quote boxes got a little messed up, but that's the best I can do

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:
I read it. The whole thing when you first posted it and it would appear that, at its inception, that was the intent. But the intent changed and you never let on that you weren't in agreement with it, Chuck.
Can you show me the point where I was told of "the intent change" ?

At some point this gesture of goodwill became an out and out steal
Mr. ego decided he want anybody returning to the original board, suspiciously at the same time I told him how David was going to fix it
Anyways, when he decided he didn't want anybody going back, he **** me without notice nor complaint about the job I was doing
greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:No he **** you when you posted up your true feelings on LF.org as soon as it went back up. Strangely, I can't find the post you made on LF.org stating what you had failed to reveal here (I suspect it's been deleted but I may be looking on the wrong thread). The statement which revealed that, though the rest of us were thinking long term, you'd had cold feet the whole time. When the CEO of a company joins his competitor, no one expects the competitor to hang on to him when he can't cut his ties with his old company.
Cannon told me it was on THIS site, but he hasn't produced it, dispite my request
Maybe you could do me the courtesy?


THAT is what makes this place a sham, a fraud, a scheme, and a steal

GW has even positined himself to steal our google traffic by using a similar domain name.
greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:Was there a time when he wasn't positioned to steal google traffic?
That time would be when he was only going to use this site as a backup

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:Was he not positioned to do so when he had your blessing to use the similar domain name?
Why yes, I suppose he was, and in my gullibility, I endorsed it
I am entirely too trusting of people

To me it is as if someone made themselves up to look like your boyfriend, just so they could **** you without you knowing who it really was
That is what I mean by disingenuious,,,,
greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:Not an apt analogy. You knew the truth, knew it was the wrong guy and **** him anyway until the real boyfriend came home.
No, I was working for a backup site, then for both sites.
I only realized that it was a steal when I became personna no gratta and couldn't even get a phone call or PM about it

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote: You played the field while david was away and you got burned. Pull up your panties, pull down your skirt, freshen your make up and walk it off, hussy.

No blisters on my ***, pal

What amazes me about the whole deal is how you guys just ASSUMED I was too honest to go along with the plan, at a point in time where I was still considering it
Having a reputation isn't always a bad thing,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

GeorgeWashington » wrote:
What layout? You're using the default skin with a photoshop graphic at the top.

I mimicked the default layout of invision because I think it is superior, and I assure you, it was no simple task. We have one of the finest phpbb skins money can buy, but you can download it for free and use it on your board..

Layout to me and in this case means America's Chat Room, Liberal Forum Political Debate, No Holds Barred, etc

All that intellectual property you had to swipe in order to lure the posters away
You got me, I admit it
I've always been the gullible sort, thinking the rest of humanity is as honest as I am

Like I said, my hat os off to you on your deviousness,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

GeorgeWashington » wrote:
Who is this our?

Is it not as much mine as it is yours, and everyone else that posts here?



That all you got to say for yourself?
A beef about a pronoun?

Enjoy your crayons, "Mr. Anonymous",,,,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:
It is a bit, but you were on board with disingenuity before you weren't on board with it.

You claim now that you've never regarded this place as a stand alone forum yet never said a word while the rest of us popped the corks in celebration of this place. He'll you drank a few glasses of champagne yourself.

You appeared to be standing firmly beside cannonpointer when he asked us all if we were willing to make a choice between the two.

You could have mentioned your loyalty to LF.org at any stage but you didn't.

That's seems disingenuous, Chuck. If it's not, help me to understand why it's not.
Please allow me to explain
First of all, my story is here:
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=684&start=45
top of the page

It will show that I was asked to administer this site by the Father of the Board, George Washington, because it was only going to run when the original went down.
That is why I agreed to the cloning, layout, forum names, etc.
If the site was down, people could find this one and he said he could import current threads, post counts, etc, and it looked to be a good way for the group to enjoy some continuity during the original board's many outages

At some point this gesture of goodwill became an out and out steal
Mr. ego decided he want anybody returning to the original board, suspiciously at the same time I told him how David was going to fix it
Anyways, when he decided he didn't want anybody going back, he **** me without notice nor complaint about the job I was doing
According to Cannon, he knew I was too honest and too loyal to go along with this scheme, so I had to go

THAT is what makes this place a sham, a fraud, a scheme, and a steal
GW has even positined himself to steal our google traffic by using a similar domain name

To me it is as if someone made themselves up to look like your boyfriend, just so they could **** you without you knowing who it really was
That is what I mean by disingenuious,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cedarswamp » wrote: :rofl:

NOW you get it!

About time!

I was running out of hints,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

greatnpowerfuloz » wrote:Chuck, is LF.org down again?
No Ma'am

You may need to save a fresh bookmark because the hosting has moved
Try this one
http://www.example.com?q=/

And have a nice day!!

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

crimsongulf » wrote:I do not think GW practiced deception at all. Keep in mind there is a sizeable population of .org that ain't the brightest crayon in the box of 64. YOu couldn't google up Mistys place if your life depended on it, this one you can.
Sure he did
That's why he did it

He's trying to get the dull crayons that are too dumb to tell the difference

Believe me, GW could register ANY site he made to show up on Google
He just chose to mimic ours because he is basically dishonest at the core.

If he were honest, he wouldn't have told me this site was for downtime only, and he would have just created a whole new site instead of cloning ours,,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cedarswamp » wrote:
You act like you have a choice, I have access to over 1000 IP's, in dozens of countries, $29.99 a year. :rofl:

But ask yourself how many times I've posted since you put a band-aid on that ****, before you supposedly locked me out. :clap:
You act like I've never fished before,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Brattle Street » wrote:
Tell me how using our name and layout etc isn't "disingeuious"

Show us some more of your ugly
Keep pretending you did something that we all know you can't show
I think it's funny,,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Kontrary » wrote:Board splinter melt-downs....predictable, but entertaining nevertheless.

The other board was just down too much and the owner didnt really seem to care much.... so after a bit, some people end up moving on ...why so much hysterics over it?
This is very true, my friend
The owner didn't care at all, until his check didn't come in

No hysterics from me, but it is funny how to me how this whole place came about and what it looks like
The Father of our Board (George Washington, for those of you who are too slow to get it) went to great lengths to deceive to populate his board
Couldn't do like an honest man and just make a board for people when LF went down.
Had to make a clone that looks like and acts like the original, same name, etc, so he can steal from the google searches, etc.
Even lied to me about his intentions to get me to help him

I thnk the whole thing is funny

Kontrary » wrote:Chuck...watch your blood pressure, this seems too important to you. Its just a message board and everyone who wants to talk to each other still can. Straight edge and twisted and her minion can keep the train wreck going over there for years to come! There will always be plenty of gawkers for that kind of mental illness, your board will be fine.
I assure you that my blood pressure is fine and you must have no idea where this sort of crap fits in to my real life.
I have about two weeks to play before the legislature comes back into session and I start using my computer for real political gain again
Like CG says, this is just beer and popcorn
And a lot of fun

Ask Cannon how seriously I take this ****
The guy who takes it all too seriously is GW.
He's gonna pop a gasket if he doesn't let off some steam, but he's afraid to blow off steam, because his ego is in the way.

He'll figure it out,,,,

User avatar
Chuck

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 53

Cannonpointer » wrote:
Ahem.

Watch how you talk to my BUDDY.
Like I said, NOBODY likes him
Why are you making me repeat myself?