Hooey -The king limp dick deflector, deflecting again.Huey » 17 Aug 2017 1:18 am » wrote: The problem is not taking a stand against the White nationals. Most have taken that stand. You haven't been here Enough lately to say other wise. The problem is we also take a stand against the same groups that attacks people on college campuses in an effort to suppress speech, or the group that chants for the killing of cops.
You want to discuss dick deflectors you look no further than the left, there were too side itching for violence Saturday. Both were responsible.
Deflection - "Waaaaa, their side is bad too". Except, the left aims their hate at only one target - Spewing fascist bigots.Sgt Bilko » 17 Aug 2017 12:59 am » wrote: Like I said Misty ignores the 20 Democrat sponsored violence. Misty is a perfect *** about ignoring her sides hate filled violence!!!
This is a random shot of some of the G20 members eating dinner.Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2017 8:32 pm » wrote: Say, speaking of Fake News, here's a rough image of what that "private meeting" Trump had with Putin.
Wow, who'd ever have known?
When did sympathy ever pay the bills, clem?Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2017 9:57 am » wrote: Gosh, when did Trump say or imply that, liar?
In fact, he showed a lot more sympathy toward the struggling and the working poor than your corrupt party did.
That's why he won Pa, Mich and Wisconsin.
You cared deeply? A bit like calling Trump a thin, black woman.Misty » 13 Nov 2016 2:48 pm » wrote: You obviously have me confused with someone else.
What I cared about was Trump losing.
I think that was pretty obvious.
If that meant she won, so be it, as long as he lost.
I doubt you'll find any posts from me where I was singing her praises.
Now you can stick a fork in me, I'm done with this subject.
I heard there was a handful of protests that got out of control. Some isolated flag burning (I never understood the concept behind that) but most protesting was of the peaceful nature. Maybe there just weren't as many as you imagined. I highly doubt they were 'purged'. News is news and violence is big news.Huey » 12 Nov 2016 8:37 pm » wrote: At the moment MOST of the violence is on the left, as usual. Our ******* are, for the most part, containing themselves with words.
I was wondering if you guys could post all the violent protests and riots that occurred when Obama won. They must have purged the internet. I can't find any refernce to them.
She needs her job.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 8:39 pm » wrote: I think the NYTimes is suggesting it, she's denying it, but she said that Trump called FOX News to complain about it before the debate.
That was the question about how he calls women fat pigs and dogs.
He seemed to be prepared with that 'only Rosie O'Donnell' answer.
I'm for as much violence and conflict as it takes for you people to finally work all that rage and anger out of your systems. And the old white dudes hardly need encouragement.Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2016 8:17 pm » wrote: Now why you wanna go and do something stupid like this? Are you just BEGGING to get your thread spammed with multiple pages of delanamores tripling teaming old white dudes for being white?
I'm confused. Did she deny that he got the question or suggest that he got the question?Misty » 12 Nov 2016 8:18 pm » wrote:OOOPS! Move over Donna Brazile.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/megyn-k ... ys.twitter
When you look up double standard in the dictionary, the trolls and man children on NHB pop out and moon you.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 1:31 pm » wrote: Again, he does not make the distinction between what people might call a member of this forum and what they call a public figure. I do.
He defended roadkill who calls me a WHORE, a SLUT, a PROSTITUTE and a ****, every chance he gets.
Huey has no problem with that, but he got his frilly pink panties all in a twist because I called Ann Coulter a ****.
People on this forum say the most horrible things about women who are public figures all the time and I don't complain, even if the ideology of that public figure aligns with mine.
But I have noticed that when you say something derogatory about a public figure on the right, the flying monkeys seem to take it quite personally, and start whining like a bunch of babies.
Huey is a prime example of that.
Misty doesn't need me to defend her but as she has you on ignore and chooses not to engage with you unless she feels it's necessary to get you to stop humping her leg, it pretty much leaves the field open for me to jump in an give you a **** slap when I feel like it.Huey » 12 Nov 2016 1:20 pm » wrote: No, that's not why. You should read the thread. When she accused people who weren't even in the conversation of sucking the dicks of under age children, when they are the father of three boys, she is on her own.
Now defend that, wench.
No, but it was men from his own tribe calling Hillary a ****. He's afraid to disagree with them. Is perfectly happy with the ******* he has and doesn't fancy being torn a new one, I guess. Though strangely, he doesn't mind it when we shove hot pokers up his ***. The kid never fails to keep coming back for more.Misty » 12 Nov 2016 1:10 pm » wrote: I'm glad Huey posted that because IMO Ann Coulter deserves to be called a word that is one the most hateful and powerful examples of verbal abuse.
She makes her living spewing hate and verbal abuse on people, so it's very fitting.
I wish there was an even stronger word that I could use in her.
I don't read Huey's post unless I have the misfortune of reading them when someone quotes him, so I don't know the answer to this.....Did he ever express the same amount of outrage over the many times that HRC has been called a **** on this forum, or any other Democratic/Liberal woman?