Chuck » wrote:
I see,
Making things look like they're not is called "clarity" now

Got it
Well, I better be going before I have to start taking notes on internet deception,,,,

Cannonpointer » wrote: There is a loooooong history there, and I am considering every aspect. I can tell you this: I will do what I believe is good for the board, and I will consult with others in making the decision. He spammed this board a few days back with a sok attack. But it was small scale by hawk standards, and he was - at the time - convinced that I had suspended his account without cause. I had not suspended it at all, and I am not even completely clear that it HAD been suspended at the time. Chuck denies doing it and so does GW. When I get my moderator software I intend to get to the bottom of it, if my luddite skill set does not prevent that.

Cannonpointer » wrote: As are you, sir. It was nice chatting with you. I promise to be SLIGHTLY less of a prick in future. As forum admin, I am not longer in a position to flame people as I used to do - at least, not until they know me better and understand that they can call my mom names and tell me to **** myself without worrying about me abusing the position.

Cannonpointer » wrote: An ironic lesson. The link leads to a "fatal error."