Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2015 6:46 pm » wrote:YOU made the claim and YOU were challenged to back it up and YOU started bleeding from your butt instead. So **** off, you bring-nothing, bluffasaurus ****. Go stalk someone else, you little *******. I will not **** your mouth, so stop begging me. THIS DICK IS FOR CHICKS, YOU FREAK.

Now, say some more stupid ****, to signify that your mom is a whore and that your dad molested you with anal rape and that you molest children regularly. Seriously, if you molest boys by licking their asses, keep posting in this thread, you bring-nothing little ***.

Prove you're a child molester! GO!

Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2015 6:46 pm » wrote: That's what I thought, you little *******.

You have chased me around the board like a ****, INSISTING that Time Magazine agrees with you and disagrees with me. I've ignored you, becuase I knew it was a bluff. I finally get tired of your spamming that over and over and over and over - and I call your bluff. Okay, I say: refute one claim with the source you claim refutes me.

"I DID," you bluff again, "but my ****** hurts and I need a dick in my mouth! Waaaaahhh!!!"

**** you, turd. You bring jack ****, you little **** chasing ape.

Here is the post you responded to, WITHOUT MEETING THE CHALLENGE, YOU COWARDLY ****:
YOU made the claim and YOU were challenged to back it up and YOU started bleeding from your butt instead. So **** off, you bring-nothing, bluffasaurus ****. Go stalk someone else, you little *******. I will not **** your mouth, so stop begging me. THIS DICK IS FOR CHICKS, YOU FREAK.

Now, say some more stupid ****, to signify that your mom is a whore and that your dad molested you with anal rape and that you molest children regularly. Seriously, if you molest boys by licking their asses, keep posting in this thread, you bring-nothing little ***.

Prove you're a child molester! GO!

Misty » 22 Oct 2015 9:24 pm » wrote:Anyway there isn't a candidate worth a damn on either side.

jayjay » 06 Aug 2015 7:32 pm » wrote: Yeah, but you expect us to forget that those five were extremely easy to predict. When it comes to tough-to-call elections, you're zero for one.

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 5:01 pm » wrote: It's like ******. You wouldn't recognize it if you had mouthful.

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 4:03 pm » wrote: Give the moron a break.

greatnpowerfuloz » 06 Aug 2015 4:03 pm » wrote: Give the moron a break.

Did you know he predicted that 5 out of 6 Red states would elect a Republican to Congress at some point? The one he missed was obviously Obama's fault.

That's gotta count for something, right?

Nightmare » 06 Aug 2015 1:52 pm » wrote:From what little I have seen of Richclem, I would say he is a bona fide **** moron

Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2015 12:09 am » wrote: wrong, wrong, blah, blah

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:48 am » wrote: You name the issue, name the prediction, name the talking point. Name it, and it's a safe assumption that you've spared a few vocabulary words defending it. That covers a lot of ground and you are hardly worth the time I'm spending to provide you with this summation, never mind the time it would take to list ALL the many issues you've been wrong about.
But somewhere, very close by, there's a splendid list of your wrongness generously provided to you by CP, not once, but numerous times. I see no need for a redundant effort on my part.

Please stop trying my patience, tweaker.

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:07 am » wrote: From the guy who gets everything wrong, that number translates to 98% correct.

greatnpowerfuloz » 26 Jul 2015 8:07 am » wrote: From the guy who gets everything wrong, that number translates to 98% correct.

Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2015 5:17 am » wrote:If government did not legislate the NYSE and other money markets into existence and officially recognize them, at the expense of the many others who are disallowed, then FREE ENTERPRISE would naturally occur. Instead, we have a state engineered economy, with the state deciding who can play what role, when, and where.

Misty » 19 Jun 2015 8:57 pm » wrote:Jon Stewart made an excellent point concerning the church shooting in Charleston, SC.

He said, "What blows my mind is the disparity of response. When we think people that are foreign are going to kill us and us killing ourselves…We invade two countries and spent trillions of dollars and lost thousands of American lives and now fly unmanned death machines over like five or six different counties, all to keep Americans safe. We’ve got to do whatever we can—we’ll torture people. We’ve got to do whatever we can to keep Americans safe. But nine people shot in a church— ‘Hey, what are you going go to do? Crazy is as crazy is, right?’ That’s the part that, for the life of me, I can’t wrap my head around. And you know it’s going to go down the same path."

He's right. It seems like when the threat comes from without, we are willing to do anything, even surrender some of our rights to fight it, but when it comes from within, we throw up our hands and say, "Oh well. Nothing we can do about it."

Somber Jon Stewart Delivers Scathing Monologue About Charleston Shooting

What?

Misty » 27 Mar 2015 3:02 pm » wrote: You justified it by saying that men are more assertive Jackhole.

Misty » 27 Mar 2015 11:42 am » wrote: And in your little pinheaded mind I guess that makes it right.
Duh!

Misty » 25 Mar 2015 6:13 pm » wrote:

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 11:16 pm » wrote: Okay, ****. I made specific claims. Refute one of them.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 5:11 pm » wrote: That's not an improvement, Lisa. Every time I think you can;t sink lower, you do.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2015 4:59 pm » wrote: TLDR. I lose patience after one sentence from you, glory hole.You're gonna have to learn to bottom line it. I figure you won't copy-paste your first sentence.