Here's your post in the form of Donald Trump. I've been playing with chatGPT a little.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I advocate for AI to a degree. It has, and still does, amazing things for humanity. Especially in the field of medicine. It can be used for a tremendous amount of good. However, I am seeing humanity going in the wrong direction with it. Just this morning, I heard on the radio that some radio stations across the nation will be using ChatGPT for their DJs. They played an example of it. You can tell it's a computer, but it's still human like. They will improve on it to the point where it will be so good that it will have become indistinguishable. No DJs will be needed. Thus, less expensive. TikTok seems to already be training society to get used to these kinds of voices.
What direction will this go? Will it get to the point where if a chatGPT, or any other AI, can eliminate a job, then it will? Students, in college and high school, are loving it all. It writes papers for them. Soon, society may substitute real social connections with AI bots. This will slowly decay and dull our minds to the point where any critical thinking will be a thing of the past.
The decline has begun.
AI - We are F-ing screwed. We are creating the new Masters who will enslave (or kill) us all. It was all documented in in the Sarah Connor Chronicles, a soon to be true story.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I advocate for AI to a degree. It has, and still does, amazing things for humanity. Especially in the field of medicine. It can be used for a tremendous amount of good. However, I am seeing humanity going in the wrong direction with it. Just this morning, I heard on the radio that some radio stations across the nation will be using ChatGPT for their DJs. They played an example of it. You can tell it's a computer, but it's still human like. They will improve on it to the point where it will be so good that it will have become indistinguishable. No DJs will be needed. Thus, less expensive. TikTok seems to already be training society to get used to these kinds of voices.
What direction will this go? Will it get to the point where if a chatGPT, or any other AI, can eliminate a job, then it will? Students, in college and high school, are loving it all. It writes papers for them. Soon, society may substitute real social connections with AI bots. This will slowly decay and dull our minds to the point where any critical thinking will be a thing of the past.
The decline has begun.
Vegas » Yesterday, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it can. Artificial or not. It doesn't think the same as we do, but it thinks. That's the point of the 'intelligence' part in 'artificial intelligence.' It displays intelligence.
And yet there you are, suffering.Vegas » Yesterday, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You insult more than anyone here. Your hypocrisy is insufferable.
The video she posted was precisely what I said it was.Vegas » Yesterday, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ You clearly have no idea about AI. Go educate yourself first, then respond.
Vegas » Yesterday, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I know that moron is on some forum somewhere. He has no life, it's all he does. I wonder which one.
Vegas » Yesterday, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I know very little about guns, but a lot about AI. You know a lot about guns, but not so much about AI. We all have our interests. Veghead and XO know everything about everything.
Vegas » Yesterday, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑Majik » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you keep up with this nonsense .....
The fact is with the advent of quantum machine learning and quantum computers ....
The programmer isn't writing the code anymore ...The quantum computer is ....
XO is a covert narcissist. They refuse to admit that they don't know something. When they don't, they come up with nonsense to try and sound competent. This is what XO does here daily.
Remember Blackvegtable? He was also a narcissist. One time he told @Huey that he could drive an 18-wheeler easily because he once drove a manual car through the Rockies.![]()
Poverty of our imagination...I like the phrase. And I agree. This I agree with as well; claiming that there is or is not an intellectual (as we know it) power beyond mortals, is actually more poverty of imagination. I don't attest to either. I do, however, have comfort with my thought that "why does it matter?"Vegas » Yesterday, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ Bertrand Russel, my favorite philosopher, though he was an atheist, agreed that if there was a God, it would not be affected by mankind's construct of time. He said humans believing that the universe had a beginning, and that it would be impossible for it to never have a beginning, or an end, is a poverty of our imagination.
Have you seen this ....Vegas » Yesterday, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ They downplay it because they are too lazy to research what it really is. They think it's just some machine with wires and metal.
They downplay the risk because of ignorance ....Vegas » Yesterday, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ A lot of people don't understand what AI is. They think it's just something that follows our shopping habits and can figure out spam emails. It isn't just a programmable machine. I know the algorithms and the math behind it all. I work with it. The algorithms are designed to help the computer teach itself and think for itself. And it works. It used to be science fiction, like the movies War Games and 2001. The ability to reason is far different than the ability to be programmed to do tasks.
That is just scratching the surface .....of the ethical debate ....that isn't being debated in a rush for profit.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I advocate for AI to a degree. It has, and still does, amazing things for humanity. Especially in the field of medicine. It can be used for a tremendous amount of good. However, I am seeing humanity going in the wrong direction with it. Just this morning, I heard on the radio that some radio stations across the nation will be using ChatGPT for their DJs. They played an example of it. You can tell it's a computer, but it's still human like. They will improve on it to the point where it will be so good that it will have become indistinguishable. No DJs will be needed. Thus, less expensive. TikTok seems to already be training society to get used to these kinds of voices.
What direction will this go? Will it get to the point where if a chatGPT, or any other AI, can eliminate a job, then it will? Students, in college and high school, are loving it all. It writes papers for them. Soon, society may substitute real social connections with AI bots. This will slowly decay and dull our minds to the point where any critical thinking will be a thing of the past.
The decline has begun.
It is more than being able to reason, of course, it is the ability for one generation to WRITE DOWN what it has learned and to pass it on to following generations.Vegas » Yesterday, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ The only thing that separates humans from the rest of the animals is our ability to think rationally. Nothing else. Otherwise, we would be just as primitive as the rest of the mammals. Our ability to think rationally can deteriorate like anything else. Not overnight. It would take generations for that to occur. However, if that is the trajectory that we allow AI to go, then our existence will be tantamount to the rest of the mammals.
Well, if no one is going to give me a red nuclear button so I can destroy Russia, China and whatever other **** country I want to destroy, then please give me AI, so that I can use it to move Joe's arthritic finger to press the stupid button.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I advocate for AI to a degree. It has, and still does, amazing things for humanity. Especially in the field of medicine.
I don't know about this evil Ai?Vegas » Yesterday, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ The only thing that separates humans from the rest of the animals is our ability to think rationally. Nothing else. Otherwise, we would be just as primitive as the rest of the mammals. Our ability to think rationally can deteriorate like anything else. Not overnight. It would take generations for that to occur. However, if that is the trajectory that we allow AI to go, then our existence will be tantamount to the rest of the mammals.
I am in the field. It does not display intelligence. It's quite artificial. Getting better but ai will never think, it will always reference and compare data sets. The only opinions it develops are those programmed in.Vegas » Yesterday, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, it can. Artificial or not. It doesn't think the same as we do, but it thinks. That's the point of the 'intelligence' part in 'artificial intelligence.' It displays intelligence.
They'll trickle back. Just watch. They will get new names, except @slideman - he's too stupid to do anything like that. But, Jess-Margaret, shim will be back.Vegas » Yesterday, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ I am sure, wherever they are, they are saying that without them NHB is nothing. Yet, all is well. It's actually better. Their temper tantrum backfired.
No, it cannot think for us. It's artificial. It's using existing human created data to generate a response. There are serious concerns, such as filters already obviously already in place driving politically correct responses. Ask chatgpt about Donald Trump and it refuses to answer. Ask about Biden and it returns some glowing butt kissing.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It's more than just a tool. A tool is used to make things easier, better, and more efficient. Yes, AI qualifies for that. However, there is another component that AI has that makes it more than just a tool. It can socialize and think for us. The other tools make thinking easier, but it doesn't serve as a complete substitution for it. Why apply critical thinking when AI can do that for us? AI can make humans the tool for them.
What a silly statement! The human definition of time is quite adequate for nearly every purpose. So after spending a lot of time in space, an astronaut returns to Earth and we learn that his age has changed by microseconds to his twin who has not left Earth. Big effing deal.Vegas » Yesterday, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ This is still up for debate. Time isn't even defined outside the human definition.
Why do you reduce yourslf to playing semantics with a person that won't accept life in real time?Vegas » Yesterday, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ One thing I have learned about American voters is that there is no such thing as an unelectable president. Our country elected a senile pedo. Bill Clinton was a rapist. Trump was a narcissist. Bush Jr loved war. Etc...