Notifications for admin

Lincoln Nebraska · 22 May 2023, 10:32 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Faaaaggggggggggggggggguuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutttttttttttttttt!

MackTheFinger · 11 May 2023, 5:54 am

admin » 05 May 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑
05 May 2023, 9:01 am
On May 17 we are migrating to a new server.

Please note that during the migration to our new server, there may be temporary disruptions in service.

****...several times I tried to sign in and this came up....mean anything to you ?

I never sav it before:

Sign into continue to Liberal Forum
Email or phone
Forgot email?
To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.

To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.
Next
Create account [email protected]

Enter your password

Show password
To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.
Next
Forgot password?

ROG62 · 05 May 2023, 10:33 pm

admin » 05 May 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑
05 May 2023, 9:01 am
On May 17 we are migrating to a new server.

Please note that during the migration to our new server, there may be temporary disruptions in service.

***GASPS!!!***

Skans · 29 Apr 2023, 6:50 am

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Oh, too bad all of my posts fell into the lake while I was fishing.

roadkill · 11 Mar 2023, 6:35 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Does this mean Biden will plead the 5th?

11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Who's a big boy?

felix the rat is a big boy!

We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!

The 4th Reich · 11 Mar 2023, 3:33 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports,and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post. You should advise these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

dildo_swaggins · 11 Mar 2023, 3:30 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

What we have here is first rate sh.it stirring. Damn fine job sir

Phelix_Dacat · 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Huey · 25 Jan 2022, 5:05 pm

Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑
25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am
It all started with

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin ?
Right @GeorgeWashington ?
Right @Cannonpointer ?
Right @Deezer Shoove ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall ?
Right @Misty ?
Right @Jinn Martini ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

I am honored. The ****** cat, in a ****** move, after naming me in his OP, banned me from his thread.

I always knew you were a ******. Thanks a bunch!

Huey · 25 Jan 2022, 10:10 am

Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2022, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑
25 Jan 2022, 9:25 am
Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑
25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am
It all started with

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin ?
Right @GeorgeWashington ?
Right @Cannonpointer ?
Right @Deezer Shoove ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall ?
Right @Misty ?
Right @Jinn Martini ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.
Deezer » wrote:
22 Jan 1970, 11:44 pm
Code: Select all
Stay away from me.
You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.
Deeze is douche, coward, and hypocrite.

Says a douche, coward and hypocrite.

Nostradamus' omh · 25 Jan 2022, 8:12 am

Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑
25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am
It all started with

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

[/code]

You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

You are a completely fooled ancestor, or a fool thinking you get away with denying life in plain sight. this whole game people play cradle to grave to get away with ignoring biology maintains eternal separation of reproductions evolving in plain sight is about to have the species ignoring biology eternally separates reproductions in plain sight bringing itself to extinction event of ending the arrival of great great grandchild again.

not a one of you think what it takes to maintain a population biologically here. I have all by myself. in time lifetimes exist as a family unit of 16 great great grandparents, 8 great great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting the arrive of lifetimes to replace those 30 forward now.
I left out siblings because that is how life eternally moves forward reproductively when a great great grandchild never becomes 1 of 16 great great grandparents 4 generations after their birth.

wake up, every reality corrupts every ancestor added to date. Power of free will as everyone is willingly ignoring how biology works in plain sight.

I will wager your intellect cannot allow this post to stay in NHB.

I won, deniers won't tolerate instinctive awareness to kinetics evolving genetics i plain sight, not through power of suggesting biology doesn't maintain eternal separation of reproductions added in this atmosphere.

Phelix_Dacat · 25 Jan 2022, 5:34 am

It all started with

Deezer » wrote:
22 Jan 1970, 11:44 pm

Isabel » 15 Jan 2022, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑
15 Jan 2022, 6:59 am

DeezerShoove » 15 Jan 2022, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑
15 Jan 2022, 6:24 am
Bammy claimed he would stop the oceans from rising.
Quote him.
Stay away from me.

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin ?
Right @GeorgeWashington ?
Right @Cannonpointer ?
Right @Deezer Shoove ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall ?
Right @Misty ?
Right @Jinn Martini ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

Code: Select all

[quote="Deezer" post_id= time=1917898 user_id=1642250090]
[quote="Isabel" post_id=1917888 time=1642247951 user_id=2570]
[quote="DeezerShoove" post_id=1917873 time=1642245866 user_id=871]
Bammy claimed he would stop the oceans from rising.[/quote]
Quote him.[/quote]
Stay away from me.[/quote]

You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

1 Nomination

Phelix_Dacat Jan 24, 2022

Go to original post on Jan 25, 2022 6:20am

Phelix_Dacat · 25 Jan 2022, 4:20 am

Isabel » 24 Jan 2022, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑
24 Jan 2022, 9:02 pm

Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2022, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑
24 Jan 2022, 8:59 pm
I was defending you from a false charge, fatty. You were being accused of being a sok. I came to your emotional rescue. You sure show gratitude in an odd way, fatness of fat.
Poor fat little pig.
Trapped by your own vile mouth, and you don't have the balls to man up and own it.

You should beg more people to save you - tell them that if they do, you will suck their dicks, just like you are sucking DeVry's right now.

I just tried to send you that information about you know who via PM, but I got an error message that reads "Some users couldn’t be added as they do not have permission to read private messages." You were the only person I was trying to PM. Check to see if your PM inbox/outbox/sent are full.

I also noticed if I go to someone else's user page, for instance, Misty's, I see under Contact Misty the action that reads PM:Send private message. Yet when I go to your profile, Isabel, that option isn't there.

It's almost like some @admin or @GeorgeWashington decided to remove your PM rights for some reason.

OK, I see. Isabel was banned by that coward Deeze.

06 Dec 2021, 11:24 am

Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm

Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin
I will appoint A.L. to moderate. She is an honest mod.

If you both fail, you are both let off with the word "stupid" as a member title. If only one fails, he is suspended for 6 months.

I will set it up.
Also, I will choose the topic.

04 Dec 2021, 4:31 pm

Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin

Got yer ****** all in a twist, eh?

Who is vagisil?

04 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm

Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin

I will appoint A.L. to moderate. She is an honest mod.

If you both fail, you are both let off with the word "stupid" as a member title. If only one fails, he is suspended for 6 months.

roadkill · 04 Dec 2021, 2:15 pm

Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin

Always remember...Veg is a gutless coward.

His mom kicked him out of her basement and Veg spent the rest of his life in pain.

Nostradamus' omh · 04 Dec 2021, 1:14 pm

Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑
04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin

Didn't you do this same crap 6 months ago?

Vegas · 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm

Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls.

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate.
2. One insult, then bye bye.
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic.
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever.

@GeorgeWashington @Cannonpointer @Annoyed Liberall @Deezer Shoove @admin

Notifications for admin

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: Site Migration

Re: Site Migration

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Re: Deeze shrieks "Stay away from me" at Isabel and then perma bans her

Re: Deeze shrieks "Stay away from me" at Isabel and then perma bans her

Re: Deeze shrieks "Stay away from me" at Isabel and then perma bans her

Deeze shrieks "Stay away from me" at Isabel and then perma bans her

Re: Texas Trumpy Hick Cowards Attack Young Hostess for daring to ask them if they were vaccinated.

Re: Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Re: Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Re: Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Re: Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Re: Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Hey mods, please force Vagisil to debate me. Loser is permanently banned.

Welcome!