User avatar
Exogenous Ellipsis

Post

User avatar
BUTT HURT AND SQUAWLING
Posts: 4336

Exogenous Ellipsis said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Faaaaggggggggggggggggguuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutttttttttttttttt!


:rofl:  
 
 

User avatar
MackTheFinger

Post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 4442

MackTheFinger said:
admin » 05 May 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: On May 17 we are migrating to a new server.

Please note that during the migration to our new server, there may be temporary disruptions in service.
****...several times I tried to sign in and this came up....mean anything to you ? 

I never sav it before:

ImageSign into continue to Liberal Forum
Email or phone
Forgot email?
To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.

To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.
Next
Create account [email protected]

Enter your password

Show password
To continue, Google will share your name, email address, language preference, and profile picture with Liberal Forum. Before using this app, you can review Liberal Forum’s privacy policy and terms of service.
Next
Forgot password? 

 
 
ultraliberals are not happy unless they are obsessing about something.
.
.
.
Image

User avatar
ROG62

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 9383

ROG62 said:
admin » 05 May 2023, 9:01 am » wrote: On May 17 we are migrating to a new server.

Please note that during the migration to our new server, there may be temporary disruptions in service.
***GASPS!!!***
 
"Libtardothink" Now that's some FUNNY **** right there...

It's because their (the Jew haters) REQUIREMENTS are "if you don't ADAMANTLY state YOU are against the Jews, you are sucking their ****..." PERIOD...and it HAS TO BE STATED within every post if not every sentence lest there's a squirrel in their vision whilst reading should they become distracted...


Image Image [url=https://postimages.org/][img]https://

User avatar
Skans

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11544

Skans said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Oh, too bad all of my posts fell into the lake while I was fishing.
 

User avatar
roadkill

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 16760

roadkill said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

Does this mean Biden will plead the 5th?     :rofl:  

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 26031

Cannonpointer said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Who's a big boy?

felix the rat is a big boy!

We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house! :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
 
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science

I stared into the Abyss, and the Abyss looked at its feet, and cleared its throat
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe

look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me we live in a world of finite resources

Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me

User avatar
The 4th Reich

Post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 498

The 4th Reich said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports,and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post. You should advise these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Image

 
 
Image

User avatar
dildo_swaggins

Post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 81

dildo_swaggins said:
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

​​​​​​What we have here is first rate sh.it stirring. Damn fine job sir 👍👍👍
Image

User avatar
Phelix_Dacat

Post

User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
Posts: 359

Phelix_Dacat said: Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin  
@GeorgeWashington  
@Cannonpointer  
@Deezer Shoove  
@Annoyed Liberall  
@Nobody  AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini  

and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)

@POM  
@SJConspirator  
@RebelGator  
@Str8tEdge  
@Warcok  

and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,

@Blackvegetable  
@nuckin futz  
@Xavier_Onassis  
@Ike Bana  
@B.See  
@ScottMon  
@Pastafarian  
@maineman  
@slideman  
@supraTruth  
@Squatchman  
@Trumprules  
@Phelix_Dacat  

and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.

Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.

Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.

This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.

To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.

The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.

 
 

Image

User avatar
Huey

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 15495

Huey said:
Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: It all started with

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin  ?
Right ​​​​​​@GeorgeWashington  ?
Right @Cannonpointer  ?
Right @Deezer Shoove  ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall  ?
Right @Misty  ?
Right @Jinn Martini  ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

Image
I am honored.  The ****** cat, in a ****** move, after naming me in his OP, banned me from his thread.    

I always knew you were a ******.  Thanks a bunch!
"in 2009, am I still Vice President?" Joe Biden

Never underestimate Joe’s ability to **** things up

Attributed to B. Obama.


Biden was against sanctuary cities before he was for them.

Joe was for a border wall before he was against it.


Invest with Bob @sock savings

User avatar
Huey

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 15495

Huey said:
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2022, 9:25 am » wrote:
Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: It all started with

Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin  ?
Right ​​​​​​@GeorgeWashington  ?
Right @Cannonpointer  ?
Right @Deezer Shoove  ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall  ?
Right @Misty  ?
Right @Jinn Martini  ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.
Deezer » wrote:

Code: Select all

Stay away from me.



You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

Image
Deeze is douche, coward, and hypocrite.

 
Says a douche, coward and hypocrite.
"in 2009, am I still Vice President?" Joe Biden

Never underestimate Joe’s ability to **** things up

Attributed to B. Obama.


Biden was against sanctuary cities before he was for them.

Joe was for a border wall before he was against it.


Invest with Bob @sock savings

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 21479

Nostradamus' omh said:
Phelix_Dacat » 25 Jan 2022, 5:20 am » wrote: It all started with


Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.


I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

[/code]

You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

Image  

 
 
You are a completely fooled ancestor, or a fool thinking you get away with denying life in plain sight. this whole game people play cradle to grave to get away with ignoring biology maintains eternal separation of reproductions evolving in plain sight is about to have the species ignoring biology eternally separates reproductions in plain sight bringing itself to extinction event of ending the arrival of great great grandchild again.

not a one of you think what it takes to maintain a population biologically here. I have all by myself. in time lifetimes exist as a family unit of 16 great great grandparents, 8 great great grandparents, 4 grandparents, 2 parenting the arrive of lifetimes to replace those 30 forward now.
I left out siblings because that is how life eternally moves forward reproductively when a great great grandchild never becomes 1 of 16 great great grandparents 4 generations after their birth.

wake up, every reality corrupts every ancestor added to date. Power of free will as everyone is willingly ignoring how biology works in plain sight.

I will wager your intellect cannot allow this post to stay in NHB.

I won, deniers won't tolerate instinctive awareness to kinetics evolving genetics i plain sight, not through power of suggesting biology doesn't maintain eternal separation of reproductions added in this atmosphere.
Last edited by Nostradamus' omh on 25 Jan 2022, 4:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Compounding Chromosome Accountant Identifying Where Eternity Actually Exists as Ancestrally Displaced Now. Understanding time living as eternally separated here as a one time event horizon never same shape since a fertilized cell joined two ancestral lineages as one male human.

User avatar
Phelix_Dacat

Post

User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
Posts: 359

Phelix_Dacat said: It all started with
Deezer » wrote:
Isabel » 15 Jan 2022, 6:59 am » wrote:
DeezerShoove » 15 Jan 2022, 6:24 am » wrote: Bammy claimed he would stop the oceans from rising.
Quote him.
Stay away from me.
Isabel then asked Deeze about his lie over and over.

Much like Vegas repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like neffy repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like Huey repeats the same **** over and over.
Much like CP repeats the same **** over and over.
You get the picture.

One set of rules for the right of center and another set of rules for the left of center.

Right @admin  ?
Right ​​​​​​@GeorgeWashington  ?
Right @Cannonpointer  ?
Right @Deezer Shoove  ?
Right @Annoyed Liberall  ?
Right @Misty  ?
Right @Jinn Martini  ?

I mean, holy **** Christ! Misty got stalked by Clem for over a damned DECADE over both forums, and she was ALLOWED to ban him here, and never did. How **** thin skinned is Deeze? I know he helps keep the lights on, but he's a petty little ****. A tyrant.

Here's what I'd like every left of center person on this site to do. Post the following to Deeze to every single one of his posts every single day. Just cut and paste it.

Code: Select all

[quote="Deezer" post_id= time=1917898 user_id=1642250090]
[quote="Isabel" post_id=1917888 time=1642247951 user_id=2570]
[quote="DeezerShoove" post_id=1917873 time=1642245866 user_id=871]
Bammy claimed he would stop the oceans from rising.[/quote]
Quote him.[/quote]
Stay away from me.[/quote]
You will always find Deeze's latest posts here.

I'll start. And I'll continue to do it. Though, work will interfere with my efforts. Never fear. I will always return to give Deeze more **** in his day.

Everyone who helps, I appreciate your efforts.

If I don't get another chance, good to have met you all. Well, most of you, anyway. See you out on that great wonderful internet.

Image  

 
 



1 Nomination

Phelix_Dacat Jan 24, 2022

Go to original post on Jan 25, 2022 6:20am
Last edited by Phelix_Dacat on 25 Jan 2022, 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Phelix_Dacat nominated this post

User avatar
Phelix_Dacat

Post

User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
Posts: 359

Phelix_Dacat said:
Isabel » 24 Jan 2022, 9:02 pm » wrote:
Cannonpointer » 24 Jan 2022, 8:59 pm » wrote: I was defending you from a false charge, fatty. You were being accused of being a sok. I came to your emotional rescue. You sure show gratitude in an odd way, fatness of fat.
Poor fat little pig.
Trapped by your own vile mouth, and you don't have the balls to man up and own it.

You should beg more people to save you - tell them that if they do, you will suck their dicks, just like you are sucking DeVry's right now.
I just tried to send you that information about you know who via PM, but I got an error message that reads "Some users couldn’t be added as they do not have permission to read private messages." You were the only person I was trying to PM. Check to see if your PM inbox/outbox/sent are full.

I also noticed if I go to someone else's user page, for instance, Misty's, I see under Contact Misty the action that reads PM:Send private message. Yet when I go to your profile, Isabel, that option isn't there. 

It's almost like some @admin  or @GeorgeWashington  decided to remove your PM rights for some reason.

OK, I see. Isabel was banned by that coward Deeze.

Image

User avatar
Annoyed Liberall

Post

User avatar
Hot Little Twist
Hot Little Twist
Posts: 653

Annoyed Liberall said:
Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2021, 3:21 pm » wrote:
Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 

@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin
I will appoint A.L. to moderate. She is an honest mod.

If you both fail, you are both let off with the word "stupid" as a member title. If only one fails, he is suspended for 6 months.
 
I will set it up.
Also, I will choose the topic.

User avatar
nuckin futz

Post

User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
Posts: 5974

nuckin futz said:
Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 

@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin
Got yer ****** all in a twist, eh? :lol:   :lol:   :lol:  
Who is vagisil?
 
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am."
Image



[/b]

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 26031

Cannonpointer said:
Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 

@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin
I will appoint A.L. to moderate. She is an honest mod.

If you both fail, you are both let off with the word "stupid" as a member title. If only one fails, he is suspended for 6 months.
 
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science

I stared into the Abyss, and the Abyss looked at its feet, and cleared its throat
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe

look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me we live in a world of finite resources

Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me

User avatar
roadkill

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 16760

roadkill said:
Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 

@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin

Always remember...Veg is a gutless coward.

His mom kicked him out of her basement and Veg spent the rest of his life in pain.


Image​​​​​​​

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 21479

Nostradamus' omh said:
Vegas » 04 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm » wrote: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 


@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin  
Didn't you do this same crap 6 months ago?
Compounding Chromosome Accountant Identifying Where Eternity Actually Exists as Ancestrally Displaced Now. Understanding time living as eternally separated here as a one time event horizon never same shape since a fertilized cell joined two ancestral lineages as one male human.

User avatar
Vegas

Post

User avatar
Giant Slayer
Posts: 10941

Vegas said: Vagisl is too much of a ****** to have a real debate with me. He is refusing my offer. **** him and his ****** ways. It is appropriate to force him to debate me without his say. I understand that everyone here trolls and says stupid ****. But I mean come on. Can we be reasonable with that? There is significant difference between seagulls sporadically **** on a beach vs a pigeon letting loose explosive diarrhea that blankets every grain of sand on the beach. We can still enjoy the beach with the **** seagulls. 

The rules are simple. This applies to both of us:

1. Intelligent debate. 
2. One insult, then bye bye. 
3. One middle school comment, then bye bye. I think the board knows what I am talking about.
4. Any claim or opinion without supporting evidence is dismissed. Thus, bye bye.
5. A mod can choose the topic. 
6. The mod decides the winner, the mod bans the loser forever. 


@GeorgeWashington  @Cannonpointer  @Annoyed Liberall  @Deezer Shoove  @admin  
razoo
"FYI Greta is one brilliant young woman ......... damn right!!!!!!!!!"

Pastafarian
"Elementary schools teaching oral sex is just part of sex education. There is nothing wrong it."