Oh come on...this joint is conspiracy theory headcase paranoia central. And anybody who's surprised that the paranoia ends up with nembers being paranoid with each other is a schmuck.
They could keep their *** at home, do the cleaning and laundry, have a meal cooked when the man comes home.....problem with you *** is you're real close to being women and it's got you all screwed up.RollingRock » 30 Sep 2021, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, women should continue shelling out over $8k annually, per child, for daycare, huh?Otherwise they're "worthless piece of **** leftists?"
JinnMartini » 03 Feb 2022, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ How do unregistered members -guests- contact anyone in the "team"?
@Cannonpointer
@Annoyed Liberall
@Deezer Shoove
@Misty
@RollingRock
?
Exactly. And let's hope there is some medical benefit.RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ Definitely. If there are things out there that do help, we need to find out.
But you, I and CNN all know Rogan was prescribed the medication from his doctor. He didn't go down to Farmer's Feed and Seed to get it. To as much as intimate such is a lie with an effort to deceive. Even Gupta knew it was a lie and he had no real excuse except to say CNN shouldn't have done it.RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Nobody "lied." Ivermectin IS a horse dewormer. You can buy it at the feed store with pictures of horses and cows on the packaging. The medication can also be used to treat lice and scabies - it's a known anti-parisitic. However large doses of the stuff can land you in the hospital with EXTREME abdominal pain.
Clinical trials are still ongoing but, to date, Ivermectin has no known benefit to treat Covid-19.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
That is why they are testing it.RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ It does. However, there has been no proven benefit in regard to Covid-19.
That wasn't your claim nor mine. Ivermectin has shown effectiveness against serious complications from Covid-19 in studies. It continues to be demonized as horse dewormer by the American press. My question is why? Who benefits? Why are you so comfortable with dishonesty?RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Please post the FDA approval to distribute for the treatment of Covid-19.
Wrong.RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ It does. However, there has been no proven benefit in regard to Covid-19.
Ivermecton has been used to treat BILLIONS all over the word since the 70s. A new study is starting in Texas:RollingRock » 19 Oct 2021, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑Nobody "lied." Ivermectin IS a horse dewormer. You can buy it at the feed store with pictures of horses and cows on the packaging. The medication can also be used to treat lice and scabies - it's a known anti-parisitic. However large doses of the stuff can land you in the hospital with EXTREME abdominal pain.neueregel » 19 Oct 2021, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Let's go at this from another angle....why do you think CNN would knowingly lie about the medicine Rogan took? What are they pushing? I know you will just be guessing but would love to hear your opinion.
Clinical trials are still ongoing but, to date, Ivermectin has no known benefit to treat Covid-19.
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
You are absollutely correct. And unfortunated, as indicated by a recent poll, most Americans don't even know what the Democratic package entails because the Dems admittedly haven't done a good job of educating the people and the obstructionists on the right (and their corporate backed cronies like the Kochs and Heritage Foundation) have been allowed to control the narrative via their USUAL "alternate reality" ****.RollingRock » 30 Sep 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I tend to believe that unbridled corporate whorism is the problem with these two. The two headlines below showcase the problem, imo:
Backed by big oil, Manchin holds the Key to Dem' climate agenda
Big Pharma, medical firms donated $750K to Kyrsten Sinema — then she opposed drug bill
As long as these two are beholden to their corporate donors, they are NOT serving the American voters who made their way through a pandemic to cast their votes in record numbers for Democrats and Joe Biden. If Democrats, as a whole, do not come through for the American people (i.e. healthcare, voting rights, child care, climate), then we are going to lose.
This bill represents the most aggressive progressive agenda I have witnessed to date on a national level. It NEEDS to pass. The American people overwhelmingly need it to pass. It is largely, if not entirely (depending on the final bill), paid for by raising the taxes on the ultra wealthy and corporations. No family making less than $400,000 will see a tax increase.
What's not to like?
Yet I fear it will not pass SOLELY because of these two senators.
Ohm and Cannonpointer have answered. It's being used as a club against those who refuse to entertain as reality the delusions of others. Who or what someone is sexually attracted to really should only matter to the individual and perhaps to the who or what they want to ****. If Bob asks to be called Barbra I will comply out of courtesy. If he demands I accept him as a woman, with full rights that come with that gender, I will politely decline. One should not suffer ill consequences for accidentally, unknowingly, or even deliberately identifying someone by their biological gender.RollingRock » 07 Oct 2021, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ My big question is how, exactly, does this affect my life (or yours) any any substantive way?
It doesn't. Why not just respect other people's choices and decisions if they're not harming others? I don't care how they identify. Their gender is irrelevant to me. Either they're a decent person or they're not......that's all I care about.
Ohm and Cannonpointer have answered. It's being used as a club against those who refuse to entertain as reality the delusions of others. Who or what someone is sexually attracted to really should only matter to the individual and perhaps to the who or what they want to ****. If Bob asks to be called Barbra I will comply out of courtesy. If he demands I accept him as a woman, with full rights that come with that gender, I will politely decline. One should not suffer ill consequences for accidentally, unknowingly, or even deliberately identifying someone by their biological gender.RollingRock » 07 Oct 2021, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ My big question is how, exactly, does this affect my life (or yours) any any substantive way?
It doesn't. Why not just respect other people's choices and decisions if they're not harming others? I don't care how they identify. Their gender is irrelevant to me. Either they're a decent person or they're not......that's all I care about.
Wow just WOW. Thank you. I see tree and my eyes perk up.. We live and die by the tree..RollingRock » 30 Sep 2021, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm a progressive and I hadn't heard of this.Did a Google:
https://treeequityscore.org/
I don't like the gubmint spying on its citizens if the deposit or with draw 600 BUCKS.RollingRock » 30 Sep 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I tend to believe that unbridled corporate whorism is the problem with these two. The two headlines below, ALONE, showcase the problem, imo:
Backed by big oil, Manchin holds the Key to Dem' climate agenda
Big Pharma, medical firms donated $750K to Kyrsten Sinema — then she opposed drug bill
As long as these two are beholden to their corporate donors, they are NOT serving the American voters who made their way through a pandemic to cast their votes in record numbers for Democrats and Joe Biden. If Democrats, as a whole, do not come through for the American people (i.e. healthcare, voting rights, child care, climate), then we are going to lose.
This bill represents the most aggressive progressive agenda I have witnessed to date on a national level. It NEEDS to pass. The American people overwhelmingly need it to pass. It is largely, if not entirely (depending on the final bill), paid for by raising the taxes on the ultra wealthy and corporations. No family making less than $400,000 will see a tax increase.
What's not to like?
Yet I fear it will not pass SOLELY because of these two senators.
Kyrsten is a brain dead whore.RollingRock » 30 Sep 2021, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ I tend to believe that unbridled corporate whorism is the problem with these two. The two headlines below, ALONE, showcase the problem, imo:
Backed by big oil, Manchin holds the Key to Dem' climate agenda
Big Pharma, medical firms donated $750K to Kyrsten Sinema — then she opposed drug bill
As long as these two are beholden to their corporate donors, they are NOT serving the American voters who made their way through a pandemic to cast their votes in record numbers for Democrats and Joe Biden. If Democrats, as a whole, do not come through for the American people (i.e. healthcare, voting rights, child care, climate), then we are going to lose.
This bill represents the most aggressive progressive agenda I have witnessed to date on a national level. It NEEDS to pass. The American people overwhelmingly need it to pass. It is largely, if not entirely (depending on the final bill), paid for by raising the taxes on the ultra wealthy and corporations. No family making less than $400,000 will see a tax increase.
What's not to like?
Yet I fear it will not pass SOLELY because of these two senators.
RollingRock » 01 Sep 2021, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ You moron, Anthony Fauci is one of the most prominent infectious disease doctors on the planet. He has served six presidents and is one of the most respected doctors of our time.
Just because he disagreed with your bloated orange fuhrer, doesn't mean he's not an outstanding doctor.![]()
Now call me some names or post a brainless partisan meme.It's literally all you've got.
We only attack FAKE MIDGET doctors.....RollingRock » 31 Aug 2021, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ That's how pathetic it's gotten, solon.They're attacking doctors now......doctors who are trying to save lives. Unbelievable.
Not at all.RollingRock » 31 Aug 2021, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You seem quite distraught. Turn that frown upside down, little fella.
My widdle feelings are fine. Again, you're projecting.![]()
If spewing insults at someone on the interwebs means "handing them their ***" then it's clear you don't get out much.Perhaps you should go polish off what's left of what you're drinking and try again tomorrow.
I accept your concession, fyi.
well that's fine... I understand that... but this was way more sinister.. We have been caught.. email back as soon as possible.. really back and forth... what ever... maybe you don't look around...RollingRock » 31 Aug 2021, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Doctors do email back and forth.That's one of the ways they communicate.