IkeBana » Yesterday, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑
It seems to me that only the most daft of members here would argue that what the members regularly contribute here are opinions. Sadly so many, perhaps the majority, of the opinions from the right on this forum consist of comments like "*** Ike sucks *** dick", and other brainy intellectual **** of that sort. Anyway, as it is onthese forums, when there is an actual debate (an exceedingly rare occasion on this particular forum) what is debated is the quality of, hopefully, factual evidence that will back up said opinions.
So, in my brief time here so far I've learned to not expect much in the way of debate over the competing factual bases behind our competing opinions...particularly when the alt-right members start to realize the debate is not going their way and they inevitably resort to "lying **** Ike" and such.
This is the inevitable consequence of being TOLD what to think.....
If you haven't arrived at the opinion by your own labors, how can you possibly hope to discuss it?
As suggested by Dr. Garfinkle....whom no Deplorable would actually find the strength to read.
Huey » wrote:
I had to lie to do it, but hey, I get to do that for a living.
I repeat slogans.
I don't care about frequency. 4 of the last 8 winners were from small countries. THat is the point.
Don't bother if it is going to be from behind. It could be anyone.
Your context is irrelevant.
If you are going to get all personal, as is your tactic, there is no need to continue