The four highlighted words tell you all you need to know. She's really good at making **** up and giving hearsay testimony.Bruce » Today, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson claims Rudy Giuliani groped her on January 6 Exclusive: in a new book, Hutchinson describes incident in which the former New York mayor put his hand ‘under my blazer, then my skirt’
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... trump-aide
—-
reads like a letter to penthouse forumBruce » Today, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson claims Rudy Giuliani groped her on January 6 Exclusive: in a new book, Hutchinson describes incident in which the former New York mayor put his hand ‘under my blazer, then my skirt’
Cassidy Hutchinson, the former Trump aide turned crucial January 6 witness, says in a new book she was groped by Rudy Giuliani, who was “like a wolf closing in on its prey”, on the day of the attack on the Capitol.Describing meeting with Giuliani backstage at Donald Trump’s speech near the White House before his supporters marched on Congress in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election, Hutchinson says the former New York mayor turned Trump lawyer put his hand “under my blazer, then my skirt”.
“I feel his frozen fingers trail up my thigh,” she writes. “He tilts his chin up. The whites of his eyes look jaundiced. My eyes dart to [Trump adviser] John Eastman, who flashes a leering grin.“I fight against the tension in my muscles and recoil from Rudy’s grip … filled with rage, I storm through the tent, on yet another quest for Mark.”Mark Meadows, Trump’s final chief of staff, was Hutchinson’s White House boss.
Hutchinson’s memoir, Enough, describes the now 27-year-old’s journey from Trump supporter to disenchantment, and her role as a key witness for the House January 6 committee. It will be published in the US next Tuesday. The Guardian obtained a copy.
Since Trump left office, Giuliani, 79, has landed in extraordinary legal and financial trouble. Like Trump, Giuliani has pleaded not guilty to 13 criminal racketeering and conspiracy charges in Georgia, over attempted election subversion. Giuliani was also found liable for defamation of two Georgia election workers. The Washington DC Bar Association has recommended he be disbarred.
Struggling to pay his legal expenses, his luxury New York apartment up for sale, and Giuliani also faces a $1.3m lawsuit from his own lawyer, seeking unpaid fees, and a $10m suit from a former personal assistant. In that suit, Giuliani is accused of offences including abuse of power, wage theft, sexual assault and harassment.
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... trump-aide
—-
Cassidy Hutchison chose to run with all those Trumpies.
She knew she wasn’t among decent Christian men.
It’s hard to feel sorry for such bad choices.
What did she expect?
No Texas jury would convict someone for shooting them...just need to do a little "prep work" before loading the weaponsBruce » Today, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ And all the ones being videoed will be caught by the border patrol.
There aren’t enough jails for all of them.
When arrested the USA sort of owns them. They have to be fed, clothed, medicated and housed until deported or given a court date for an asylum claim.
No, you can’t build a wall on the Rio Grande river.
And you can’t shoot them.
Any good ideas?
Prove it.Bruce » 11 Sep 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Caused Republicans to stockpile ammo.
Since 2008 the majors can forget about quality control and run the machines as fast as they can.
Before Obama they had to worry if there were more than one misfire per brick.
If there is a will..there is a way.Bruce » Today, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ And all the ones being videoed will be caught by the border patrol.
There aren’t enough jails for all of them.
When arrested the USA sort of owns them. They have to be fed, clothed, medicated and housed until deported or given a court date for an asylum claim.
No, you can’t build a wall on the Rio Grande river.
And you can’t shoot them.
Any good ideas?
Did you add this to help justify putting Guiliani behind bars...?Bruce » Today, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ The other Trumpies said Guiliani was drunk most of the time, which would explain most of the old bastard thinking that beautiful 25 year old girl might like him to put the moves on her.
Bruce » Today, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson claims Rudy Giuliani groped her on January 6 Exclusive: in a new book, Hutchinson describes incident in which the former New York mayor put his hand ‘under my blazer, then my skirt’
Cassidy Hutchinson, the former Trump aide turned crucial January 6 witness, says in a new book she was groped by Rudy Giuliani, who was “like a wolf closing in on its prey”, on the day of the attack on the Capitol.Describing meeting with Giuliani backstage at Donald Trump’s speech near the White House before his supporters marched on Congress in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election, Hutchinson says the former New York mayor turned Trump lawyer put his hand “under my blazer, then my skirt”.
“I feel his frozen fingers trail up my thigh,” she writes. “He tilts his chin up. The whites of his eyes look jaundiced. My eyes dart to [Trump adviser] John Eastman, who flashes a leering grin.“I fight against the tension in my muscles and recoil from Rudy’s grip … filled with rage, I storm through the tent, on yet another quest for Mark.”Mark Meadows, Trump’s final chief of staff, was Hutchinson’s White House boss.
Hutchinson’s memoir, Enough, describes the now 27-year-old’s journey from Trump supporter to disenchantment, and her role as a key witness for the House January 6 committee. It will be published in the US next Tuesday. The Guardian obtained a copy.
Since Trump left office, Giuliani, 79, has landed in extraordinary legal and financial trouble. Like Trump, Giuliani has pleaded not guilty to 13 criminal racketeering and conspiracy charges in Georgia, over attempted election subversion. Giuliani was also found liable for defamation of two Georgia election workers. The Washington DC Bar Association has recommended he be disbarred.
Struggling to pay his legal expenses, his luxury New York apartment up for sale, and Giuliani also faces a $1.3m lawsuit from his own lawyer, seeking unpaid fees, and a $10m suit from a former personal assistant. In that suit, Giuliani is accused of offences including abuse of power, wage theft, sexual assault and harassment.
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... trump-aide
—-
Cassidy Hutchison chose to run with all those Trumpies.
She knew she wasn’t among decent Christian men.
It’s hard to feel sorry for such bad choices.
What did she expect?
vell vee neet to show zee vaccine paypas to enter KanadaBruce » Today, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ One of the precious liberties we were fortunately born with is Americans do not live in a police state where we must show our papers to travel.
This nation does NOT have open borders with Mexico.
We have 22,000 border patrol catching about 8,000 souls a day.
The free market libertarian solution is to let the market decide who stays and goes. That’s how our ancestors got here from Europe.
There are liberals who want that but I don’t.
I want more paperwork required to live and work in the USA.
Then fewer will come.
Maybe someone forgot to tell them...
ha ha ha ha civilized people don't get a choice to not follow the law where rule of law gives every ancestor the choice to deny why they exist reproductively here living eternally separated in plain sight. Wonder why corruption is never resolved any generation gap throughout history? rhetorical question.Bruce » Today, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ There is a century old international treaty between Mexico and the USA that makes the Rio Grande international waters. And Abbot is putting up barrels in the waterway.
If the Trumpies could they would machine gun those people, because Trumpies are barely literate goons.
But civilized people follow the law.
Monday the Border Patrol caught 8,000 people attempting illegal entry.
Each one had to be processed. They were fed, given water, clothes and medical care if needed. Children were not separated from families. This is what civilized nations do. Trumpies would gas them like Nazis did. Do not pretend otherwise.
There are three possibilities for adults captured.
1. Prosecution. If they are prosecuted then they stay until the process is complete. Only criminals are prosecuted, a tiny fraction.
2. If the immigrant is intelligent they apply for asylum. When they do that the law says their claim must be adjudicated. The courts have ruled they stay until adjudication. Trumpies would gas them with the others.
3. For the majority of the thousands caught daily they are deported back to their nation of origin, usually on a plane.
Because **** Republicans will not revise the laws this is what must be done.
As many as the Border Patrol catch an unknown number escape through and once they get a few miles inside the USA blend in with the 11 (?) million other illegal immigrants and Republicans hire them to work for cash.
It’s a horrible human tragedy.
Any workable solutions short of the Fourth Reich?
And their orders are to destroy any barriers that Abbott has put in place to prevent illegals crossing and assist the 10's of 1000's of illegals to cross into the US. Mexico is doing NOTHING to stop them!!!Bruce » Today, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ CNN) — The Defense Department is ramping up resources at the US-Mexico border as officials describe a surge in border crossings in places including Eagle Pass, Texas, where the mayor has declared a state of emergency.
Some 800 new active-duty personnel are being sent to the border, where 2,500 National Guard members already are serving, Department of Homeland Security officials announced Wednesday night in a call with reporters.
The move comes as migrant crossings along that border are rising, reaching more than 8,000 apprehensions on Monday, according to a Department of Homeland Security official. That’s up from around 3,500 daily border arrests after the expiration in May of Title 42 triggered new consequences for those who cross the border illegally.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/21/us/migra ... -emergency
THEY HAVE ORDERS TO LET THE ILLEGALS IN.... **** SCUMBAG DEMOCRATSBruce » Today, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ CNN) — The Defense Department is ramping up resources at the US-Mexico border as officials describe a surge in border crossings in places including Eagle Pass, Texas, where the mayor has declared a state of emergency.
Some 800 new active-duty personnel are being sent to the border, where 2,500 National Guard members already are serving, Department of Homeland Security officials announced Wednesday night in a call with reporters.
The move comes as migrant crossings along that border are rising, reaching more than 8,000 apprehensions on Monday, according to a Department of Homeland Security official. That’s up from around 3,500 daily border arrests after the expiration in May of Title 42 triggered new consequences for those who cross the border illegally.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/21/us/migra ... -emergency
Yeah, Elmer Keith is the quintessential "Fudd". But, kudos to you for knowing who Elmer Keith is. As I am sure most gun folks know, a Fudd (Elmer Fudd) is someone who professes to be for Americans owning double-barrel shot guns, but have a long litany of guns they don't want their fellow Americans to own. They want THEIR GUN, but will allow leftists to take all other guns that are not THEIR GUN of choice. Elmer Keith was the human embodiment of Elmer Fudd.
That statement makes no sense for multiple reasons. There is no "self-defense" justification to buy dozens and dozens of old classic, cheap-*** guns. Truth be told, you only need one handgun for self defense. But, I remind you, gun ownership is not based on "need" it is based on a guaranteed right.Yes, there was an incidental self defense justification to buy dozens and dozens of old classics for a few hundred dollars each.
There's nothing wrong with that. I've done that with guns, knives, watches, vintage stereo equipment, cars and motorcycles. You're not a man if I don't love some toys!!!Mostly it was buying the toys I could not afford as a kid.
STFU! You have no basis for saying that. Because we don't support abortion on demand? Or, because we believe in self-determination, self-reliance, self-defense and personal responsibility? Lay it out, brother, let's see what you have to support your stupid claim.The worthless piece of **** right wingers have made Christianity have a bad name.
Proud, life-long republican here saying F-you to you and the rest of the sissy-pants Democrats.Being a Republican a bad name.
You keep pretending you own the power of suggestion that converts ancestral brains into social characters obedient to possibilities rather than navigate around what isn't possible civilly..Bruce » Today, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ I grew up reading Elmer Kieth.
Yes, there was an incidental self defense justification to buy dozens and dozens of old classics for a few hundred dollars each.
Mostly it was buying the toys I could not afford as a kid.
The worthless piece of **** right wingers have made Christianity have a bad name.
And supporting law enforcement a bad name.
Being a Republican a bad name.
And now all firearms.
Of you told somebody you grew up a gun loving Christian Republican conservative who supported law enforcement and had too many guns to count you could never in a million years convince decent people you were not some idiot who loved Trump.
Trump supporters don't own guns just to kill people.Bruce » Today, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ Until recent years my buying old guns was a hobby.
Today I feel like a low life, piece of ****, stupid, Putin loving Trumpy when I open my safes.
The only reason Trumpies like guns is as weapons to kill other people. That is the only defense they have for owning guns.
If I could live my life over I’d have only a few.
There countless, COUNTLESS, examples of unreported de-escalations and downright defense events out there.Skans » Yesterday, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Is anyone else sick and tired of reading @Bruce's rare accounts of when someone misuses a firearm? I for one am. There are countless instances where law abiding citizens use firearms to protect themselves and their loved ones. Every month, the NRA reports a handful of them. Here's a tiny sampling:The main stream media never reports this. Never. Anti-gunners and gun-banners like Bruce never discuss this, never reference any of these countless examples. The Police do not protect anyone. They investigate crimes after the fact. If you want to be safe, YOU WILL go out and buy a gun, learn to use it and become competent with it. Bruce and Democrats just want everyone to be perpetual victims of violence. If anyone here believes any **** that Bruce says, you might as well bend over and let him shove his aids-infected **** inside your willing ***.
- Three or four armed intruders kicked in a door of a residence and forced a woman to the floor at gunpoint while they burglarized her home. Another resident heard the commotion from a bedroom, grabbed a “long gun,” and exchanged fire with the intruders, forcing them to flee, police said.
- A driver recognized a wanted murder suspect walking along a rural road and held him at gunpoint until police arrived. A U.S. Marshals Fugitive Task Force and local police had been on a four-day manhunt for the suspect, who is alleged to have shot to death his girlfriend and her teenage son.
- A man used his AR-15 to defend himself against two armed, masked gunmen who approached his home, threatened the three residents, and demanded money. At one point, a robber pointed his gun at a resident’s head, which appears to have sparked a shootout, police said. Two residents were injured in the ensuing firefight, but the assailants fled and the residents were expected to survive.
- Four armed intruders broke into a residence and assaulted the homeowner, police said. The homeowner was able to grab and shoot his own firearm, killing two attackers and wounding the others, who now face a plethora of felony charges. The homeowner’s 4-year-old daughter was injured in the crossfire, but was expected to make a full recovery.
- An armed robber walked into a cell phone store and demanded store property at gunpoint from an employee. The employee, a concealed carry permit holder, drew his own handgun and fatally shot the robber, police said.
You are an expert at typecasting other ancestries other than your own stereotypical behavior, what is missing from your one sided opinion? Understanding the evolving process inside out.Bruce » Today, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ Until recent years my buying old guns was a hobby.
Today I feel like a low life, piece of ****, stupid, Putin loving Trumpy when I open my safes.
The only reason Trumpies like guns is as weapons to kill other people. That is the only defense they have for owning guns.
If I could live my life over I’d have only a few.
Why not?
Ummm...LincolnNebraska » Yesterday, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Ever notice these patterns? There are at least 3 people here claiming gun ownership, but their other posts are anti-gun.
I caught @Bruce post pasting a bunch of gibberish from the Ruger forums on this thread: https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=72633
@Squatchman . claims he owns all these guns, but he was vehemently against concealed and constitutional carry in @Imgreatagain 's thread.
@maineman says he owns all these guns, but refuses to post one pic. I challenged him in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=75057
------------------------------------------
There are liberals who write these retarded blogs all over the internet. The blogger poses as someone who grew up on farm. The bumpkin later moves to the big city. When the bumpkin's friend dies in big city violence, the bumpkin gets an epiphany about the horror of guns. It's a fake template story where libs just change the names and places. The blog always concludes with: Yes, I still love firearms for hunting, but we need common sense gun legislation.
I've had enough written discourse with Squatchman to believe he owns guns. The others, not so much, especially Bruce. I can get a pretty good feel for whether someone actually has and shoots guns after a little "gun talk" with them. That's just my opinion.LincolnNebraska » Yesterday, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Ever notice these patterns? There are at least 3 people here claiming gun ownership, but their other posts are anti-gun.
I caught @Bruce post pasting a bunch of gibberish from the Ruger forums on this thread: https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=72633
@Squatchman . claims he owns all these guns, but he was vehemently against concealed and constitutional carry in @Imgreatagain 's thread.
@maineman says he owns all these guns, but refuses to post one pic. I challenged him in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=75057
------------------------------------------
There are liberals who write these retarded blogs all over the internet. The blogger poses as someone who grew up on farm. The bumpkin later moves to the big city. When the bumpkin's friend dies in big city violence, the bumpkin gets an epiphany about the horror of guns. It's a fake template story where libs just change the names and places. The blog always concludes with: Yes, I still love firearms for hunting, but we need common sense gun legislation.