-
-
- Posts: 3810
-
Not really, but my parrot is.
This is his white sister. She makes the same warning:
Parrot Saying NiggAr LOL!!! - YouTube
WHERE'S JACKIE?
-
-
- Posts: 3810
-
I have an African Green parrot that is taught to scream "Wake up! There's a *** in the house!" They're African birds, so they can recognize them and stuff.
Then there's the Glock 19
WHERE'S JACKIE?
-
-
- Posts: 5563
-
An AWESOME name for a band........
Trademark it if you can.
I BE AN ASPIRING RAPER .. GNOMESAIN..?
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 12045
-
Beevee is the richclem of the left.Vegas » 20 Jul 2022, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑ He finally agreed. It's been like a year. He finally agreed to the challenge without cheating. Life or death.
@GeorgeWashington or @Annoyed Liberall , would either of you mind judging?
The challenge is very simple. The judge is to pick a random page of each of our OP threads and look to see which one of us has more thoughts of his own and commentary about the article or the topic of the OP. Noth through the whole thread, just the OPs. As you know, Veghead loves to have Google talk for him. He puts no mental effort into his OPs, just copy/pasted ****.
Stipulations
1. Despite what Veghead's uneducated retarded *** thinks, titles do not count. I have tried to explain what the purpose of a title is, but he couldn't care less.
2. The commentary needs to be intelligent and relevant. So, that means things like "Grifty is a **** moron and so are his slackjawed supporters" does not count. There has to be some intelligent thought behind it.
3. It isn't about whether you agree or disagree with our commentary, it's about whether we came up with on our own.
The one with the most OPs, on the random page you choose, who has original thoughts, wins. The other is banned for life.
Real Media is Trying...Are You? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Here is a succinct expose of his type:
Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I will now present you with the DEFINING POST of Glory Hole Clem's career. You will be exposed to the difference between me, and the vast majority of right wing hacks on this board - the very worst elements of which are incorporated and incarnated (if he's human and not a bot) in the drivel we get from Glory Hole Clem. This is pasted from another thread:
There it is, folks. There is Glory Hole Clem, in a nut shell.[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=171329#p171329 » wrote:RichClem»17Feb20142:38pm[/url]]
What, are you brain dead? The only sources you cited were for raw statistics, and the only thing supporting your wacky claim about Reagan and Carter is your ignorant, psychotic analysis.
Cite a mainstream source, i.e. opinion based on analysis, that backs up your claim that Carter was better on the economy than Reagan.
He values "accepted" opinion over GENERATED opinion. A subject cannot be argued on its merits between us. We must always defer to authority. A PROPOSITION HAS LESS VALUE OR MORE VALUE BASED ON WHO IT COMES FROM.
Just think of it. His COMPLAINT is that my sources were only cited for raw statistics, and not opinions. That was his COMPLAINT - that I made my own case instead of repeating talking points generated elsewhere.
And now you see what a chump this guy is, from his own mouth, in his own words.
Please - vote in the poll.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- 98% Macho Man
- Posts: 12045
-
I have never followed y'all's debate. Show me that lightweight accepting a challenge with consequences - I am salting my hat in anticipation.Vegas » 17 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ He started a thread agreeing. @Blackvegetable
Either @Cannonpointer @GeorgeWashington or @Annoyed Liberall will judge. Now, I know that we need members here, so I am willing to change the stakes. Initially, the stakes were that the loser would be banned for life. That may be a little too much for Veghead to handle. He would end up on the news for committing a mass shooting or something. So, how about this? The loser will have to start an OP that admits the winner is far superior in intellect to the loser...and a few other things added, to which details I will provide to Veghead after he loses.
CP, GW, and AI, you all recall the challenge, yes? I can explain it again.
"Because I said so" is a fallacy, not science
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
When your map disputes the territory, your map is wrong - not the territory
There is no retreating FROM a home - only to
Invisible Hands pick pockets
Humanity's law of the jungle is survival of the tribe
look at the power we derive from a single atom, and tell me again that we live in a world of finite resources
Nostalgia is the folly of going to a place, looking for a time
You cannot betray me, only yourself, to me
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 6206
-
He started a thread agreeing. @Blackvegetable
Either @Cannonpointer @GeorgeWashington or @Annoyed Liberall will judge. Now, I know that we need members here, so I am willing to change the stakes. Initially, the stakes were that the loser would be banned for life. That may be a little too much for Veghead to handle. He would end up on the news for committing a mass shooting or something. So, how about this? The loser will have to start an OP that admits the winner is far superior in intellect to the loser...and a few other things added, to which details I will provide to Veghead after he loses.
CP, GW, and AI, you all recall the challenge, yes? I can explain it again.
Either @Cannonpointer @GeorgeWashington or @Annoyed Liberall will judge. Now, I know that we need members here, so I am willing to change the stakes. Initially, the stakes were that the loser would be banned for life. That may be a little too much for Veghead to handle. He would end up on the news for committing a mass shooting or something. So, how about this? The loser will have to start an OP that admits the winner is far superior in intellect to the loser...and a few other things added, to which details I will provide to Veghead after he loses.
CP, GW, and AI, you all recall the challenge, yes? I can explain it again.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
-
- Posts: 959
-
I can't believe I never mentioned this before. I was watching a Seinfeld episode about when Elaine hooked up with J. Peterman. I am a retired letter carrier here in Lexington and I was Peterman's mailman for a few years in the late 90's. He lived in a modest house at the time (I believe he still lives there) but I never met him as he was pretty busy in those days. An interesting tidbit about him is that his daughter is married to the actor Steve Zahn and I believe they have a farm here in Central Kentucky.AnnoyedLiberall » 13 Jun 2022, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ It would be fun to learn a little more about one another as people, and not just our political beliefs.
Let's all share some fun facts about ourselves.
1. I am related to the Kennedy's.
2. I can talk backwards.
3. I am a published author.
Feel free to ask me any questions.
Keep it nice please.
No dick swinging or name calling.
-
-
- Posts: 5563
-
George Floyd...?AnnoyedLiberall » 29 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I have a cousin that is a lot more famous than her.
But, I don't really tell people who he is.
Some here know.
I BE AN ASPIRING RAPER .. GNOMESAIN..?
-
-
- Posts: 705
-
Sports? Actor? Businessman?
come on. Give some hints.
What are you? Like 32?
-
-
- Posts: 4364
-
Yep, I was close wasn't I. Ok, if it wasn't Bruce, then I'm getting a vibe John something or something that starts with a J or G or B in his name?
-
- Forum Patron Emeritus
- Posts: 2635
-
Then @Annoyed Liberall would have said . . . "I had" a cousin . . .
-
-
- Posts: 4139
-
AnnoyedLiberall » 29 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I have a cousin that is a lot more famous than her.
But, I don't really tell people who he is.
Some here know.
i dont care how famous people are. I just think she is cool
'when a man speaks of culture i reach for my revolver' -Hanns Johst
'swords will be drawn to testify that leaves are green in summer' -chesterson
'sovereign is he who decides the exception'-Carl Schmitt
'swords will be drawn to testify that leaves are green in summer' -chesterson
'sovereign is he who decides the exception'-Carl Schmitt
-
-
- Posts: 4364
-
Freddie Mercury?AnnoyedLiberall » 29 Aug 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I have a cousin that is a lot more famous than her.
But, I don't really tell people who he is.
Some here know.
-
-
- Posts: 11565
-
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Sounds larger than evolving here now as a simple ancestral displacement sustaining numbers present.Annoyed Liberall » 29 Aug 2022, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ I agree. This is the main reason I have pulled away here.
I need to focus on my spiritual path and take all the negativity out of the equation.
E=M/3C\3 < https://i.postimg.cc/m2V7YRBx/Picture-186.jpg < ancestral choice vs results> https://i.postimg.cc/HsrhKSxh/Picture-123.jpg
-
-
- Posts: 14462
-
AnnoyedLiberall » 07 Dec 2021, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ It has to make a sound.
Energy is displaced and moved.
Air molecules are moved...but without a receiver, aka: ear, there is no sound. The brain perceives it as sound.
"Sound does not travel at all in space. The vacuum of outer space has essentially zero air. Because sound is just vibrating air, space has no air to vibrate and therefore no sound."
-
-
- Posts: 3001
-
In the EU they require mandatory amniocentesis. Those found with Downs syndrome are aborted under strong medical pressure well over 90% of the time. It's been called eugenics. Our rates are lower here because there is no single payer health system thus no amniocentesis requirement. I hear ya but I think what they are doing to downs kids in Europe illustrates my point.AnnoyedLiberall » 29 Jul 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Not really.
A lot of people know they are going to have retards, and they still have them.
That's a lifelong struggle with no grand kids.
Again I believe sexual orientation is a developed and conditioned behavior. There is no more a gay gene than there is a rape/sadism gene, a gender confusion gene. People are certainly born with differing levels of masculinity and femininity but orientation is a developed preference.
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"
-
-
- Posts: 3810
-
Funny though. No country has ever been great for black men...even their own. Does that tell ya sumpin?
WHERE'S JACKIE?
-
-
- Posts: 1430
-
So far I've yet to see one of you ******* make any sense.AnnoyedLiberall » 27 Jul 2022, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ Can you help me suss what the **** that post had to do with the post to which it pretends to respond?
It means he is butthurt over some perceived slight.
I smell an incel with mommy issues.
Probably ugly, overweight, and socially retarded.
Where's the begging, whore?