Deezer Shoove said:

danobivins » 06 May 2014 2:12 pm » wrote:Oh just shut the **** up, birther-AGW denier.

Birther isn't a word in your sense. Since you are a liar and kind of stupid, I'm certain you can't come close to any serious comment I've ever made about the Kenyan cum U.S. president. That's a good one. Must be just a locked and loaded "insult" I don't think I've even called him mulatto much less what you think of most of the time, racist ****.
Good luck with your disgust with me. That you hate me makes me feel I'm alright. Being hated by human debris is a good thing.
Sorry I can't extend the same to you. Just some fuzzy notion of . . . I guess, pity. Grow up a bit. It doesn't hurt.

The Kenyan is a boogeyman farting the world away. KGW

birther-AGW denier?

Cannonpointer said:

danobivins » 14 Apr 2014 9:53 am » wrote:....not sure how this represents "govt helping big biz" but have at it. Anti=govt hacks are always complaining about about anti-capitalist regulations. Now regulations are "pro-capitalist"?
I suppose anti-monopoly laws were pro-cap too?

The government is trying everything it can to beat up the vape industry - a free enterprise industry - on behalf of big tobacco - a wall street industry. Nothing terribly complex, here.

The problem they have is this: If the FDA takes authority over vapes, they have a small problem, since propylene glycol and nicotine are the only ingredients in e-liquid. Oh, there are some flavors, but those can - and would - be scrapped immediately, depriving the FDA of authority.

Now, if they take authority based on propylene glycol, there are thousands of products, including food stuffs and medically prescribed vaporizers, that already have that product in them. Ooops. And if they take authority based on nicotine, that would ALSO force them to regulate tobacco as "safe and effective," which cannot be done if the devil himself becomes big tobacco's advocate.

Wall Street's media has been chomping at the bit, spewing lie after lie about vaping on the "news." But the government itself is really having a tough time on this thing. What to do, what to do...

Cannonpointer said:

danobivins » 17 Feb 2014 5:11 pm » wrote:Wasn't the unemployment rate over 10% under reagan?
Nothing to brag abt.

As Silver Fox reminded us, Reagan was the guy who changed how unemployment numbers (and vegetables) were counted.

He wanted to count catsup on a hamburger as a vegetable in school lunches. His buddies in the military industrial complex could afford artichokes and Brussels sprouts - but **** America's school children. For them, CATSUP was a veggie.

The man was a monster.