Money for Neo

3,486 posts
User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Fat lady screamed rape and it's off to the Supreme Court.
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Jantje_Smit » 27 Nov 2020, 8:50 am » wrote: What you #resistance clowns need to keep in mind is that it isn't over until the electoral college has sung... doesn't seem likely individual 1 will pull it off but this is the orange Twilight Zone and weird things happen all the time...

There is a reason they haven't taken the boards off the windows and its not fear of disgruntled Trump supporters. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

https://youtu.be/-PKy0zDcCUs

Imagine for a second if they made an identical commercial about whites.
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 27 Nov 2020, 1:49 pm » wrote: Even Trump's installed traitors won't try to stage that coup. They know what would happen to them.  

Cry and weep about that all you like JantjeClown.

They just might and your weeping will be epic.
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Atomicblonde » 27 Nov 2020, 1:18 am » wrote: nope. I wanted Obama to succeed. I voted for him the first time. 
he failed big time. Biden will be another Obama without a doubt.
Obama didn't have cognitive decline and a coke head son selling access to his office. Biden will be worse than Obama. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

supraTruth » 26 Nov 2020, 1:56 pm » wrote: Not your 2nd panel, u TYPICAL LYING PIECE OF tRump ****.
Joe Biden – “little black and brown girls woke up to see themselves for the first time in a new way, as the stuff of Presidents and Vice Presidents” 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 25 Nov 2020, 12:36 pm » wrote: I am saying that you can't seem to support your claim that "their argument" is:   "They say that gender is a construct.  Therefore we can choose our gender", you are lying.

YOU:  You can't be serious.

Yes, I can.

YOU:   I'll most certainly provide you the evidence, but I want to see if you are indeed this **** stupid first.

Provide it.
Gender fluid is one of the 57 genders recognized. The term bisexual implies there are only two sexes, surprised bisexuality isn't considered hate speech. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Many witnesses were women so they must be believed.
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 24 Nov 2020, 8:02 pm » wrote: No one is saying it's a "mood".

I see your use of the word "feeling" to describe gender identity was INTENDED to disparage it as fleeting and unimportant.

Bad form.
It's as fleeting as a 5 year old declaring himself a fireman or napoleon or the family dog. Only one of these claims drives progressive parents into medical child abuse.
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 24 Nov 2020, 5:18 pm » wrote: YOU: Denial of material fact is delusional.
Isabel: Who did that?

 So you can quote people denying what genitals they have?
Or are you just delusional about that?
Any **** in line for sex reassignment mutilation is just such a ****. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 24 Nov 2020, 4:52 pm » wrote: Which has nothing to do with gender identity.

YOU: Denial of material fact is delusional.

Who did that?
Those born with **** saying they were born in the wrong body. Those born with **** claiming the same. I don't support delusional thinking. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Misty » 24 Nov 2020, 4:50 pm » wrote: Whatever.
I don't understand why so many straight men are so threatened by this stuff.
I don't understand why acceptance of deviant behavior is demanded under penalty of law. I have no issues with any of of it, as long as it involves consenting adults. I have a problem with businesses being forced to celebrate deviant behavior they might find objectionable. 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Misty » 24 Nov 2020, 4:47 pm » wrote: You seem to be the one conflating the two.
No. I do not conflate the two at all. Gender is a social construction, sex is not.
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Misty » 24 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm » wrote: I have to wonder why so many of the men on this forum are obsessed with the subject of gender identity.
Love David Bowie. Have no issues with those that challenge gender norms. I have an issue with conflating gender with sex.
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Misty » 24 Nov 2020, 4:34 pm » wrote: If that is true, they didn't just decide later in life.
They always knew.
They just decided to come out later in life.
****. They were led by propaganda to question their sex. No different than losing someone to a cult. Guess they were genetically predisposed to swallowing **** too.
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Vegas » 24 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm » wrote: The whole thing is based on a logical fallacy. 

They feel trapped in the other gender's body. Yet, they have never been that gender before to know that. 
They say that gender is a construct, therefore we can choose our gender. If it's a construct, then that means it doesn't exist in nature at all, which completely destroys the first part of their arguement about feeling they are a different gender than the body they are trapped in. It's a circular arguement,
Gender norms are constructed, biological sex is not. Attempts to change biological reality are nothing more than mutilation given our technological limitations. Some that can afford to put millions into their mutilation get better appearing results but that has to be discouraging to those that can only afford a dime store wig and a couple hormone blocking supplements. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 24 Nov 2020, 3:56 pm » wrote: No, it isn't.

YOU:   Sex identity is biological.

Meaningless.  All human traits are "biological".

YOU:   One can not conform to the gender norms of a given society without losing track of their biological sex identity.

Nonsense.  Behavior does not affect gender identity.
Biological meaning you have a **** or a ****. Denial of material fact is delusional. 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

Isabel » 24 Nov 2020, 3:31 pm » wrote: No, they aren't.

YOU:    unless you believe a child can be born with a prediction for chubby rape of inanimate animal shaped objects.

Absurd non sequitur.

YOU:    We are born with varying levels of sexual appetites.

No one is talking about "levels".  We are talking about gender identity.

YOU:    How those appetites are fed is based on experience, environment, and social norms.

Meaningless crap.

YOU:    Gender expression is the same.

No one is talking about "expression".   We are talking about gender identity.

YOU:    A man wearing a skirt in America is gender non conforming. Wearing one in Scotland is normal.

No one is talking about clothing.   We are talking about gender identity.
Gender identity is nebulous and is determined by culture. Sex identity is biological. One can not conform to the gender norms of a given society without losing track of their biological sex identity. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"






User avatar
Neo

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 28445

GeorgeWashington » 24 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm » wrote: Coronavirus New York: As COVID cases surge on Staten Island, restaurant declares 'autonomous zone'

Businesses are facing new restrictions, but one owner says he won't close his doors, declaring his Grant City pub an "autonomous zone."

"This was a dream for me and my partner, and for it to be stripped away is very tough," Keith McAlarney said. "And it's a very scary time we're in."

Choking back tears, McAlarney said he is desperate and that his year-old Mac's Public House is on the brink of shutting down. Now, he's posted an eyebrow-raising statement plastered on the window, saying "We refuse to abide by any rules and regulations put fourth by the mayor of New York City and governor of New York state."

"It does mean what it says, but we do have proper safety measures in place," he said.

McAlarney doesn't get why restaurants are once again being singled out by Cuomo, with Staten Island designated an orange zone and indoor dining again shuttered. What those zones mean is listed below.

Gyms and salons are also closed, with capacity limits in houses of worship and gatherings limited to 10 people. McAlarney is unsure what will happen if and when the city tries to shut him down.

"I guess we're going to end up finding out," he said.

https://abc7ny.com/health/as-cases-surg ... e/8220593/
Partner? That language indicates he is a progressive and likely a homosexual one. Interesting. 
 
"I WOULD RATHER HAVE QUESTIONS THAT CANNOT BE ANSWERED...
THAN TO HAVE ANSWERS THAT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED"








Log in or Register to remove ads