-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Huey » Yesterday, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I am right here. You know my name, my address, and what I look like. Running away from things is what your dad knew you were best at. You are an anonymous keyboard Komando issue threats and talking big with no skill or intention of carry them out.
Go ahead and lie about anything I just said, Daddy’s lil princess
Is Veghead having a meltdown again?
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
I had to edit the title from "she's" to "he's."
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
FOS » Yesterday, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I believe that what Vegas is alerting us to is simply this: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy
I was going to use black/white as the logic before I chose the OP's argument. I thought it may be too difficult for the left. They have a hard time with abstract concepts, so I dumbed it down.
Grey is a mix of black and white, so you can't say grey is independent of black/white or a separate color. You can have black/white without grey, but you can't have grey without black/white. They can't logically say there is an independent and separate gender when it is depending on the current two genders to produce the third.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
He couldn't get past the first 5 words.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
FOS » Yesterday, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Check this put also lol https://twitter.com/RightWingCope/statu ... 74400?s=19
Dang. Good find. Shapiro is overrated.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
DeplorablePatriot » Yesterday, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The deep state's heads are exploding over this right now. There's only one reason why. I hope Musk doesn't end up having a self-inflicted "accident" like Epstein did. Expose those ****!
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Though Caitlyn is mentally ill, he isn't wrong.
This whole Elon and Twitter purchase never seemed to make much sense until now. I mean, Elon is talented in creating profitable businesses. He could have easily started his own platform and bury Twitter through the competition. However, he decided to buy into a company that he knew was a complete ****. If you noticed his demeaner in interviews, prior to the purchase, he didn't appear to care if Twitter goes bankrupt when he took over. It was all just odd to me. However, I am starting to see a possible reason.
Maybe he has no intentions on making Twitter successful. He bought into it for the sole reason to expose the deep corruption within the government. Twitter is the best route in providing hard evidence of it. Once he does that, he probably couldn't care less about its future.
Thoughts? @Blackvegetable we all know you have none, so **** off.
Caitlyn Jenner tells Elon Musk he's 'public enemy number one to some very, very bad people' and that she's worried about his safety (msn.com)
This whole Elon and Twitter purchase never seemed to make much sense until now. I mean, Elon is talented in creating profitable businesses. He could have easily started his own platform and bury Twitter through the competition. However, he decided to buy into a company that he knew was a complete ****. If you noticed his demeaner in interviews, prior to the purchase, he didn't appear to care if Twitter goes bankrupt when he took over. It was all just odd to me. However, I am starting to see a possible reason.
Maybe he has no intentions on making Twitter successful. He bought into it for the sole reason to expose the deep corruption within the government. Twitter is the best route in providing hard evidence of it. Once he does that, he probably couldn't care less about its future.
Thoughts? @Blackvegetable we all know you have none, so **** off.
Caitlyn Jenner tells Elon Musk he's 'public enemy number one to some very, very bad people' and that she's worried about his safety (msn.com)
Last edited by Vegas on 04 Dec 2022, 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
The last logic challenge I gave, you lefties failed miserably. Non-binary vs binary = binary - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Let's try another one. Here is the skeletal bare bones of it:
Thesis: Gender and sex are the same.
Premise 1: Take the color blue. We have different shades of blue. There's light blue, dark blue, midnight blue, etc...but it's still blue. Not red. Not yellow. Not purple. Regardless of the shade, it is always still blue. Males and females can have a spectrum within themselves, but they are still always male and female. There are masculine males and feminine (homos) males, but regardless of the spectrum, they are still male. Likewise, there a feminine females and masculine females (lesbos), but they are still female.
Premise 2: Gender is just a spectrum within each sex.
Thus, gender and sex are the same.
Let's try another one. Here is the skeletal bare bones of it:
Thesis: Gender and sex are the same.
Premise 1: Take the color blue. We have different shades of blue. There's light blue, dark blue, midnight blue, etc...but it's still blue. Not red. Not yellow. Not purple. Regardless of the shade, it is always still blue. Males and females can have a spectrum within themselves, but they are still always male and female. There are masculine males and feminine (homos) males, but regardless of the spectrum, they are still male. Likewise, there a feminine females and masculine females (lesbos), but they are still female.
Premise 2: Gender is just a spectrum within each sex.
Thus, gender and sex are the same.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Never, ever, trust Vegas' retellings...
They're almost as divorced from reality as @Huey 's...
In a public hearing that lasted more than an hour, Las Vegas Foodie Fest/Great American Foodie Fest founder Noel Casimiro represented the owners of the lot, speaking before and after the City Council heard comments from the public. Those comments, made in person and submitted via email, were overwhelmingly opposed to the project.
A dozen people lined up to tell the council why they opposed the project, citing concerns such as garbage, noise, traffic and lighting. Another 14 people — including Arts District landlords, business owners and residents — submitted comments electronically in opposition. Not a single member of the public showed up to speak in support of the plan, although one electronic comment in support was read into the record....
The Las Vegas City Council voted unanimously Wednesday to deny permission to use a vacant Arts District lot as a space for hosting up to 10 food trucks,
https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/poli ... l-2293690/
**** moron.
1. Congrats that you found an article from almost two years ago.
2. Congrats on posting an article that is completely unrelated to the OP.
Irreversibly stupid.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Obviously not to you.
As always, it takes 400 times before you finally give an answer.
Hence, your nickname Darth Evader.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
I know why you can't answer the OP. It forces you to think for yourself. God knows you have no thoughts of your own.
Are you having a hard time finding something to copy/paste over from the internet or something, like always?
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Look at this ****. He still won't answer. He refuses to answer. God what a coward.Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2022, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Even @Huey could figure it out.
But I bet you are leaving out essential details.
It's a simple yes/no. Ok ****. Answer it. Don't answer it. I don't give a ****. But enough of your evasions already.
1. Watch this you all, he will find a way to cower out again. Probably through a question /demand.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
This is why universities are getting bad rap. They graduate people like this. Someone like her shouldn't have been granted a degree in the first place.DeplorablePatriot » 03 Dec 2022, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ There's a place for "teachers" like this. Institutionalized or euthanized, take your pick.
Our nation was never in the social gutter until leftists. We are in a rapid state of decline.
Someone may "teach" this teacher, and others like IT. I didn't realize that in CA, teachers get their certificate at age 10.
California elementary school teacher uses stuffed animals to teach kids lesson on being 'gender-fluid' | Fox News
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
DeplorablePatriot » 03 Dec 2022, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ There is a reason why people are fleeing Nudeslime country. There isn't housing discrimination, nor has there ever been. You live within your means. If blacks didn't educate themselves or learn a trade to become gainfully employed to a point where they could afford better housing, who's fault is that? All the white people, of course!
California reparations proposal could mean $223K per person in payments for Black residents | Fox News
Cannon and you have a great plan. I also am going to identify as a black person. At least until I get my 223k.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
Oh, and also @Ike Bana , I don't know if you consider yourself a Jew or not, given that you were raised by them, but you also can take your victimhood mentality and shove it up your ***.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
@FOS and I were talking briefly about Jewish sympathy. I was reminded of my experiences from our beloved public education system. Before I begin, let me preface two very important points:
1. I would never, under any circumstance, wish harm to Jews...or anyone for that matter. I respect their rights as I do any other group. I would also stand up for their rights as Americans, like I would for any other group. I just simply don't like them. OK? I don't wish them harm; I just don't like them. That's it. So don't get your panties all wadded up, thinking that Vegas wants to deport all American Jews, etc...relax. We all dislike some groups whether we admit it or not. I am just admitting which group I dislike the most. O'tay?
2. Whatever your opinion of FOS is, just know that I don't give a ****.
Now that I got that out of the way, let's talk. Jewish sympathy is fabricated. I don't know about you all, but I recall spending 3 to 4 weeks, in both US history and social studies, being taught about the holocaust and many other Jewish tribulations that had nothing to do with our society in America. We had to have our parents sign some waiver, or whatever it was, to give the school permission to show us the videos of all those emaciated bodies being dumped, along with the crematories. Basically, any vids or pics that existed, they showed it. They went in depth about Jewish history up to WWII, and of course the Nuremberg trials. By the time they were done, they made sure that Jews should be considered the greatest victims known to mankind.
But here is the thing. Black history, in particular slavery, didn't nearly get the attention the Jews did. We went over it of course. However, we skimmed the surfaces of it all. We learned about slavery, but the depth we went into, didn't compare to the depth we went into the holocaust and other Jewish hardships. Blacks have been part of US history since the whole thing began. They were here since the very beginning. Yet, Jews got more attention, and they don't nearly have the influence on America's history as blacks did and still do. Not even close.
All I am saying, is maybe people should start asking questions about the influence of Jews without being afraid of being called a bigot every time. There is nothing wrong with being inquisitive.
@Blackvegetable look, I know that you are a Jew, so this OP applies to you. Unfortunately, this is waayyyyyyyyyyyyyy too long for your pea brain to read and understand. So, just go back to your Dr. Suess books and **** off.
1. I would never, under any circumstance, wish harm to Jews...or anyone for that matter. I respect their rights as I do any other group. I would also stand up for their rights as Americans, like I would for any other group. I just simply don't like them. OK? I don't wish them harm; I just don't like them. That's it. So don't get your panties all wadded up, thinking that Vegas wants to deport all American Jews, etc...relax. We all dislike some groups whether we admit it or not. I am just admitting which group I dislike the most. O'tay?
2. Whatever your opinion of FOS is, just know that I don't give a ****.
Now that I got that out of the way, let's talk. Jewish sympathy is fabricated. I don't know about you all, but I recall spending 3 to 4 weeks, in both US history and social studies, being taught about the holocaust and many other Jewish tribulations that had nothing to do with our society in America. We had to have our parents sign some waiver, or whatever it was, to give the school permission to show us the videos of all those emaciated bodies being dumped, along with the crematories. Basically, any vids or pics that existed, they showed it. They went in depth about Jewish history up to WWII, and of course the Nuremberg trials. By the time they were done, they made sure that Jews should be considered the greatest victims known to mankind.
But here is the thing. Black history, in particular slavery, didn't nearly get the attention the Jews did. We went over it of course. However, we skimmed the surfaces of it all. We learned about slavery, but the depth we went into, didn't compare to the depth we went into the holocaust and other Jewish hardships. Blacks have been part of US history since the whole thing began. They were here since the very beginning. Yet, Jews got more attention, and they don't nearly have the influence on America's history as blacks did and still do. Not even close.
All I am saying, is maybe people should start asking questions about the influence of Jews without being afraid of being called a bigot every time. There is nothing wrong with being inquisitive.
@Blackvegetable look, I know that you are a Jew, so this OP applies to you. Unfortunately, this is waayyyyyyyyyyyyyy too long for your pea brain to read and understand. So, just go back to your Dr. Suess books and **** off.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
That's what turned me on the issue.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Based on literally criminal trials like penguin books vs Irving, thr only evidence for the holocaust is eyewitness testimony.
Nothing else.
It has been admitted in trials.
The first thing that made me wonder was the fact that some countries made it illegal to deny it. Anyone, with half of a brain, should consider that to be an enormous act of unethical practices, not just for a supposedly free society, but in the field of historical research. Historians can't be free to be historians now?
The next thing was what you just said. There is no way that physical evidence should not exist. For a massacre like that, and there is no physical evidence, only testimonies? ****.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The reason people wouldn't bother to question slavery...and why it wouldn't be illegal...is because the evidence is actually.overwhelming.
You can go to a museum and see chains from an actual slave ship (and you can also look up thay ship and see it was probably owned by a Dutch jew)
But the holocaust has no such equivalent evidence. Not a single gas chamber artifact. Anywhere. Just people insisting it happened and punishing you for doubting.
That's what I mean by the red flag. The Congo massacre and slavery has overwhelming evidence. So, it's pointless to question it.
Allegedly, the holocaust has equivalent amount of evidence. Yet, there is some point somehow to question it? Red flag.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ Hollywood is like the headquarters for the industry at large.
Our entire culture revolves around the **** those ******* produce.
The self-importance is their hallmark.
Every crappy little local tv or radio station thinks they're producing celebrities.
...and a moronic adoring public feeds that set of phonies.
Sports, reality, cooking, etc fit right into all that ****.
So, "nothing would change" is far from the truth if Hollywood disappeared. Just my opinion.
I would say it's the other way around. Hollywood fits into sports, reality, cooking, TV and radio. Those things will exist with or without Hollywood.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.
-
- Giant Slayer
- Posts: 19004
-
That should be a huge red flag. Being prevented from asking questions. That's medieval mentality. There is no logical justification to make it illegal to question history. None. King Leopold II tortured and murdered over 10 million blacks in the Congo. There is no law against questioning that.FOS » 02 Dec 2022, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ and in most countries it is illegal to even question if that event actually occurred.
Rules for Veghead...aka Darth Evader...aka Askholio...aka coward:
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them You don't have a choice.
Rule 1: No questions/demands allowed until you can prove that you habitually answer everyone else's questions the first time around.
Notice the bolded word. Answering one ot two questions is hardly habitual.
Rule 2: No more redundancy. Only people with severe low IQs say the same crap over and over. It''s due to a level 2+ deficiency.
Stipulations to abide by them
You don't have a choice.