User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Image
 

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

sootedupCyndi » 01 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm » wrote: ha ha ha ha… aren't you awesome. Image
I know girls are hopelessly turned on by nerd video game talk but please try to contain your excitement
 

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Pengwin » 17 Oct 2021, 8:59 pm » wrote: 1. Stupid
2. Unnecessary
3. Poses a deadly threat others
4. Makes them more likely to do something stupid, like shoot at a shoplifter
5. Not what Second Amendment is about
6. I could keep going but - why bother

dude. tell me how many times some guy carrying a gun legally at wallmart has randomly shot people. This is literally a fiction that the media planted in your head. it isnt real.

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

You leftoids are so hysterical about this event. It is far less significant than any of the dozens of blm riots

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Neo » 19 Apr 2021, 8:40 pm » wrote: They have to count more than half of Hispanic as white for homicide perpetrators to reach 47% white. It's cray cray. If you asked an inner city black person whom they more feared between a white officer like Chauvin or a thug like Trayvon Martin the answer would be interesting.

Now ask yourself why the Jewish media lies about whites.


User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

It seems typical that people pick and choose their ethics based on some instinct or whatever feels good to them. 

This causes ethics To become a bizarre creation which is simultaneously arbitrary and deeply important...and the majority of modern discussions on politics seems to be centered around questions.of ethics...upon which no logic can be employed because it is merely an aesthetic feeling...and so there is no negotiation. Or is their any discussion about issues that are actually.political...such as the analysis of power or indeed even the likelihood of survival.

I think I could at least establish that the highest ethical priority must be survical...and this is for purely logical reasons. 

Quite simply...it doesn't matter how 'good' you are if you don't exist. If you are a being that actually cares about having positive effects on the world...you must exist (survive) in order to accomplish this. Non existing people are no use to anyone.

Therefore if you follow some sort of eadical.pacificism where you refuse to fight even in self defense...and you are attacked by some external enemy that is not as nice as you...then they will destroy and replace you...and so your ethics managed to do nothing more than make the world a worse place.

Likewise if you are in the process of extreme dyslexic decline...where only the least capable people are reproducing and passing harmful genetics to the next generation...you must halt that and turn it around...or again you will fail to survive and just like the radical pacifists your ethics do more harm than good to the world. 

Indeed I believe that all human ethics has its source in survival and biologically evolved instincts that assist survival. The anglo race tends to adopt a very individualistic and open code of ethics...and this is because their strategy for survival involved rapid development of technology...and the traits associated with himan genius are such that the anglo people must foster such an environment in order to nurture such genius. You may not realize that survival and biology is what is really dictating what you think is right or wrong...but if you examine the cause and effect of it I believe you will see that it must be so. That is how evolution works. 

Meanwhile if you notice some ethical standard that is recently adopted and stifles or literally precludes survival...I suggest you investigate where it came from. I believe you will always see it comes from an external source...a competing tribe.



1 Nomination

Cannonpointer Oct 11, 2021

Go to original post on Oct 11, 2021 4:27pm
Go to nomination on Oct 12, 2021 12:42am
Last edited by FOS on 12 Oct 2021, 6:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Annoyed Liberall awarded winner

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

GHETTOBLASTER » 14 Oct 2021, 5:01 pm » wrote: TRUST FUND BABIES are always the best at dispensing Stock Market advice.
Lol I was a trust fund baby. 

I personally would not invest in stocks right now.

I think bitcpin is gonna still go up...and ibwould consider foreign exchange markets

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Pengwin » 13 Oct 2021, 4:28 pm » wrote: "Hitler’s regime touted the “Nordic race” as its eugenic ideal..."

FYI you can know this is **** because nazi genetic scientists managed to categorize 5 major subgroups within the German the German ethnicity. 

The ones labeled Nordic were only about 10-20% of the German people. Far more common were Alpines. 

Each subgroup was considered to have its own spiritual and physical propensities on average and it's own strengths and weaknesses The diversity of thr German people and cooperation between them was considered vital to the thriving of the entire German biosphere. 

I don't think many of the naxi high command were even Nordic themselves...and the head philosopher wasn't even german...

So yeah...your source is obviously ****...as anyone who promotes the holocaust hoax would. Those ppl don't give a **** about truth. 

Thr nazis did indeed value racial purity because they knew outbreeding depression is a thing...and it simply is...that is a scientific fact. 

Mix a greyhound with a pit bull. It won't be as fast as a greyhound and it won't be as good at pit fighting as a pit bull. This is an indisputable...and obviois....scientific fact. 

So sure the nazis were concerned with maintaining strong racial hygeine...because this is objectively a good thing for the German people...but that has nothing to do with certain life forms being superior. 

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Pengwin » 13 Oct 2021, 4:43 pm » wrote: eu·gen·ics
/yo͞oˈjeniks/

noun
  1. the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. 
  2. Developed largely by Sir Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, eugenics was increasingly discredited as unscientific and racially biased during the 20th century, especially after the adoption of its doctrines by the Nazis in order to justify their treatment of Jews, disabled people, and other minority groups.
Lol definition 2 is just ****...and is nothing more than pandering to the Hollywood religion. 

I would challenge you to find any quote from any nazi OR from fancis gallon that would remotely justify this definition
 

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Oct 2021, 5:08 pm » wrote: Eugenics is intentionally  biased Dumb ****.
When choosing a suitable mate members of most any mammal species I can think of practice "Eugenics" to some degree.
Just think back on all those nice looking women who have rejected you.....  Image

I suppose the desire to treat congenital disease is am atrocity lol

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 13 Oct 2021, 4:15 pm » wrote: I dont agree with his premise.

That is my entire point
Idiot. You cannot disagree with a premise that you cannot define. That violates basic logic

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 13 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm » wrote: Ask the racist thst made the claim

well u are acting like u understand somehow. you seem to have some measure that you are using. anyway if u dont even understand the claim....then u cant disagree....

duh...

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 13 Oct 2021, 2:09 pm » wrote: But you would agree these people are genetically superior to you

what the **** is genetic superiority?

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Bidennextpresident » 13 Oct 2021, 10:39 am » wrote: The media failed to report the big story, which is actually a very good one: American workers are now flexing their muscles for the first time in decades.

You might say workers have declared a national general strike until they get better pay and improved working conditions.

No one calls it a general strike. But in its own disorganized way it’s related to the organized strikes breaking out across the land – Hollywood TV and film crews, John Deere workers, Alabama coal miners, Nabisco workers, Kellogg workers, nurses in California, healthcare workers in Buffalo.

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...e-robert-reich

it seems the peasants are restless. when is joe gonna just start killing them?

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 13 Oct 2021, 1:16 pm » wrote: Or better yet why not push for the freedom of all slaves

you literally just run your mouth talking about **** you know nothing about because you assume the superficial **** jews told you MUST be correct cause jews would never lie. You simply are not properly informed about that particular historical event...and the truth of it does not support your narrative...and it also is merely anecdotal

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Crazytrain » 11 Oct 2021, 6:17 am » wrote: These cons will use force and attack you for wearing a mask. When the right wing says they will kill you believe them.

omg its baliscally another holocaust. 6 million mask wearers were savagely killed by people wearing redhats!

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 11 Oct 2021, 8:38 pm » wrote: So no real science.   Just opinion 

That's what I said nazi.  Lol
It is an opinion that will Smith is black and Dolly Parton is white? 

Jews have really **** with your brain. 
 

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 11 Oct 2021, 8:13 pm » wrote: I deny you're over the age of 12

I provide the same evidence as you

I can simply look at the vast majority of humans on earth and correctly determine their race..DNA test isn't needed. 

Clearly will Smith is black, Dolly patron is white, and Jackie Chan is east Asian. 

Are you confused by any of this? You can try to deny it but it just makes u look stupid

User avatar
FOS

Post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 8126

Vegasgiants » 11 Oct 2021, 7:12 pm » wrote: you must be drunk again.  You cant even type.

Race is defined in the US subjectively by the person.  Obama had as much right to claim white as black....he CHOSE black.

Race is simply a social construct.  There is no blood test or dna test for race.  It's an opinion.

Species will never be eliminated as their is no species mixing.    Race will become a thing of the past

Oh....and your a **** moron nazi.   Lol
Nothing is subjective about the consequences of genetic differences. 

You are either ignorant of such consequences or you are not. Reality doesn't care. 

You are not making any points. You are just chanting your cults dogma as ifnyou were casting a spell or something.. magical thinking.