He was precisely what they were looking to rub America's nose in.Z09 » Yesterday, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑
https://rumble.com/embed/v2noak8/?pub=4Majik » Yesterday, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑
The EU Parliament held the International COVID-19 Summit III in Brussels, Belgium earlier this month.
In a recent address to the European Parliament, a US businessman specializing in patent auditing David Martin claimed that COVID-19 was not a natural occurrence but a calculated act of “biological warfare and a financial heist. Nature was hijacked, science was hijacked.”
In his presentation in front of the EU parliament, Martin argued that the pandemic we said happened in the last few years did not overnight, citing sources in the public domain.
According to him, the coronavirus was first identified in 1965 and serves as a model pathogen. In addition, they learned that coronaviruses can be modified.
“But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date 1966. I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data-sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.”
According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990.
However, the medical community and pharmaceutical companies quickly learned that the vaccines were ineffective.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/0 ... id-19-was/
Very interesting story.roadkill » 24 May 2023, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑
https://flagandcross.com/teen-reportedl ... ontent=CAN
They were early leaders on the pick-your-bathroom ****. I have boycotted them for years.ConsRule » 25 May 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑
Tell it where it is wrong, THEN call it a *******.FredH » 25 May 2023, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑Your depth of intellect is so shallow. What a *******.Xavier_Onassis » 25 May 2023, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑
Physical aggression by either side would wreck the economies of all concerned, and citizens would rebel and their actions cannot be predicted.
Old-timey? Otherly transgendered? Obstinately Temperamental? I don't know what you mean by "OT."Mrkelly » 25 May 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑
not big on impeachments .. not tRump or Biden
its just a **** distraction
I just saw that video and was wondering where best to post it, and there it was
and if being OT is now a hold that is barred, you are gonna be one busy boy
So it isn't even germaine to the OP, then.Mrkelly » 25 May 2023, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑
they laughed because she is the last person that should “call for order”
where you been?
Laughter doesn't kill a bill - I checked.
Target is owned by a creepy jew who is gender confused and one of the leaders of the tranny (bowel) movement.Kobia2 » 25 May 2023, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑
This is far worse and more alarming than the BUD-Light Tranny Can issue, because the clothing campaign is aimed at Children, where the Beer was at Adults...
Target loses $9B in week following boycott calls over LGBTQ-friendly kids clothing
https://nypost.com/2023/05/25/target-lo ... ign=nypost
Target has lost $9 billion in market value since angry social media users called for a boycott of the Minneapolis-based retailer over its rollout of the “PRIDE” collection featuring LGBTQ-friendly clothing for children.
A week ago Wednesday before the controversy erupted, Target’s stock closed at $160.96 a share, giving the big-box chain a market capitalization of $74.3 billion... As of early trading on Thursday, however, shares of the company were trading off 1% at $141.76 — capping a weeklong tumble that has shrunk the “cheap chic” discount retailer’s value to $65.3 billion..... That amounts to a 12% drop that has shaved a whopping $9 billion off the company’s market capitalization.
Target said on Tuesday it was removing some items from its stores and making other changes to its LGBTQ+ merchandise nationwide ahead of Pride month after intense backlash from some customers who confronted workers and tipped over displays... Target said in a statement on Tuesday... “Given these volatile circumstances, we are making adjustments to our plans, including removing items that have been at the center of the most significant confrontational behavior.”... That was just days after Target CEO Brian Cornell had defended the LBGTQ-friendly merchandise, saying it was “the right thing for society.”
Target declined to specify Wednesday which items it was removing but among the ones that garnered the most attention were “tuck friendly” women’s swimsuits that allow trans women who have not had gender-affirming operations to conceal their private parts.
Let me ask you this: Was andersonville a genocide? Because it produced a lot of **** bodies.DeplorablePatriot » 25 May 2023, 12:05 am » wrote: ↑
With all that is presented in this, I can't wrap my mind around denying that woman and children, not merely Soviet POWs, were executed or died in camps or ghettos. The numbers? They certainly may be inaccurate, but how do you discount survivor testimony, historical documents, photos, as well as Nazi and American military newsreels and documents? Do you believe that the footage of Patton forcing German citizens to view the bodies of men, women and children in the camps, then assisting in their burials to be fraudulent or staged? How could they pull something like that off during that era? And why?
Just asking. Seems overwhelmingly evident to me. But I'm no Nazi historian buff as you are.
Holocaust: Definition, Remembrance & Meaning | HISTORY
I would take issue with the term "scapegoat." It implies innocence.DeezerShoove » 24 May 2023, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑
Individual Jews were on their own. Many did leave. Most could not.
And deportation without a destination does not work.
You raised the issue of women owning their own bodies, fruity - a position that you do not hold when it comes to experimenting on them with drugs that have not been approved for use on humans.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑
A pregnant woman cannot infect colleagues and make them pregnant, so that is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT ISSUE.
Until you want to inject them with experimental chemicals, fruitloop.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑
Women OWN THEIR OWN BODIES,
They were fired permanently, ****. They were only rehired due to litigation.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑
Not free - pig farma made billions, moron.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑
That does not follow the science. The science FAR from in on EITHER the safety OR the efficacy of those drugs. They have not been approved by the fda, you idiot. They were pushed under an emergency authorization - not under approval. Those who took the shot were participants in a medical experiment - NOT patients receiving approved medications.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑
There is no science backing that, you stupid, tv-programmed turd.Xavier_Onassis » 24 May 2023, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑
You are retarded.Skans » 18 May 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑
I thought she was treated quite fairly.nuckinfutz » 23 May 2023, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑
And am trying to get Lord Benson.
Misty will never get on a poly board after her horrid treatment here.
The fruitcake says he is "spread thin" online.roadkill » 24 May 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑
She's still drinking?MackTheFinger » 23 May 2023, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑
Another day...another black out.
I never even knew the thread existed - or if I did, I've forgotten it.MackTheFinger » 23 May 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑
I responded to your post...so now I am waiting for a response to it.
Once again it is not about my mom....it is drunk'n **** deleting my tread about him being a drunk and him censoring my post.
You might not have know that BUT he did....so I'm waiting to hear from you or are you going to be a cyber punk ?