Vegasgiants » Today, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:25 pm

Say we dont need a investigation like benghazi.

Say it

You **** loved that 2 year hillary bash that led to zero convictions.  

We have had 500 arrests for this incident

Now **** off

Vegas » Today, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:50 pm

Oh God. You are going to set Darth Evader and Askholio out.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:47 am

Which nothing, with a nonissue...

Bidennextpresident » 22 Jun 2021, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2021, 7:24 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told Democratic colleagues on Tuesday that she is creating a new committee to investigate the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, according to a person familiar with her remarks.

Pelosi made the announcement at a private leadership meeting and did not give additional details. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private remarks.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump ... 05357028ee

Neo » 22 Jun 2021, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2021, 1:30 pm

They always seem to forget those 20 years between the democrats finally kicking out the kkk and other white racists and and modern day. They make up some white savior fantasy about seeing the light and driving the racists to the republican party. While it's true that racists are more likely to vote republican out of spite today, it's not true their ideology has been welcomed with any real recognition. When the white racist vote was of any consequence, they voted democrat. We agree with the racists that democrats suck. We disagree that race is consequential. In that the white bigots share the same tent as the democrat brown bigots. For most conservatives race is inconsequential. Saying that is now called racist by the left so **** their racially obsessed asses right in the stink hole they so venerate.

DennisTheMenace » 22 Jun 2021, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jun 2021, 6:43 am

Rule number one.  Politicans should be making it easier for American citizens to vote.  Not harder. 

That is undebatable. 

The Republican Party knows that the more votes that are cast...the less likely they are to win.

The Republican Party reelection mantra should be "suppress the vote."

The Senate will take up S. 1, a sweeping voting rights and campaign finance reform bill, at the end of June, signaling that Democrats are pressing forward with their agenda despite the threat of filibuster by Republicans.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a letter to colleagues that the Senate will vote on the "For the People Act" in the last week of the June work period. But the bill is unlikely to move forward in the Senate, as most legislation requires 60 votes to advance, and Democrats have a 50-seat majority. Republicans oppose S. 1, meaning that a vote to end debate on it is all but certain to fail.

The bill would revise government ethics and campaign finance laws, and try to strengthen voting rights by creating automatic voter registration and expanding access to early and absentee voting. The legislation would also require states to overhaul their voter registration systems, limit states' ability to remove people from voter rolls, increase federal funds for election security, and reform the redistricting process.

Some Democrats have also expressed concerns about the bill, most notably Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate from West Virginia who has called on his colleagues to put together bipartisan voting reform legislation. Schumer told reporters on Friday that "we've had two very good, strong and intense discussions in our caucus" about the bill, and said that "it was made clear how important S. 1 is to the country, to our Democratic majority and to individual senators."

"Those discussions are ongoing and I have a lot of faith in them," Schumer said.

The Senate is in recess next week, but Schumer said it would take up the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act on June 8. The vote was initially set to occur on Friday, but last-minute opposition derailed the bipartisan bill, which would try to counter China's global economic and political influence. The bill was a key priority for Schumer, who, along with Republican Senator Todd Young, wrote the base of the legislation.

The Senate will also take up the House-passed Paycheck Fairness Act that week, which aims to reduce the gender wage gap. Schumer told reporters that the Senate may consider gun safety and LGBTQ equality legislation in June, too.

However, Republicans are unlikely to support most, if any, of these bills. Some Democrats have called for the elimination of the filibuster, which would allow bills to advance with a simple majority. There were renewed calls to end the filibuster on Friday, after Senate Republicans blocked a bill to create a commission to investigate the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Fifty-four senators voted to advance the bill, meaning that without the filibuster blocking it, the measure would have passed.

"I think the events of the last few days, probably made every member of our caucus, realize that a lot of our Republican colleagues are not willing to work with us on a whole lot of issues, even issues where we tried to be bipartisan," Schumer told reporters on Friday. Although he was unwilling to commit to consider eliminating the filibuster outright, Schumer said that "everything is on the table."

However, Manchin, who has consistently expressed opposition to eliminating the filibuster, told reporters on Thursday that he was "not ready to destroy our government."

Rock » 18 Jun 2021, 10:56 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2021, 10:56 pm

If one is going to claim to be Catholic they can't pick and choose which moral rules they obey just for political expediency.

Abatjour » 18 Jun 2021, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2021, 1:59 pm

this record may never be broken on this website. iit may stand for decades, yes, forevermore.

today, an entire legion hath ascended onto my posts' archive, to downvote my posts over weeks and days. did my mere my words on their, device, snatch their souls out of their chests?    is this their way to confess??

girls and boys, go to my money portal to check, and behold... never let mere words on a computer screen cause massive satanic sobbing via your, emotions, like which this hurt heart harem hath harvest here:

@RollingRock

@rippy3838

@sooted up Cyndi

​​​@omh

...


 
 
 

 

AnnoyedLiberall » 18 Jun 2021, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2021, 12:19 pm

They did the right thing.
Take the misdemeanor and forfeit the weapons.
Live to fight another day.
Those protestors ceased being law abiding citizens when they busted down that gate.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jun 2021, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2021, 10:20 am

I understand that the ammosexuals were successfully prosecuted, suggesting that the DA brought a convincing  indictment.

And that you are, once again, railing against Reality.

simplejack » 18 Jun 2021, 12:49 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jun 2021, 12:49 am

https://news.yahoo.com/st-louis-couple- ... 45157.html

You **** trumpretards will all loose yer guns soon.

RollingRock » 17 Jun 2021, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2021, 1:52 pm

If Mike Pence had walked out the wrong door and into a crowd of these idiots chanting, "Hang Mike Pence!!" you don't think they would have tried to kill him?  How about AOC or Nancy Pelosi?  I have no doubt they would be dead.

I do agree the individuals who barricaded federal officers inside the building should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  That is attempted murder, no doubt.  Those are valid points, Huey.

For some, it absolutely was, Huey.  There are conspiracy charges in the works against a few of the Oath Keepers who attacked the Capitol on January 6th.  Some of them were definitely planning to do a lot of harm.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2021, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2021, 7:45 am

I guess when California is handing out a tax rebate, you gotta stay relevant somehow..

Just won't be able to enter many buildings...

simplejack » 17 Jun 2021, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2021, 8:54 am

https://news.yahoo.com/14-republicans-v ... 29091.html
Hammering nails in their own coffin.
2022 these old **** will fade away.

IkeBana » 17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am

Whataboutism...it's all they got.  Whatabout...howabout...blah...blah.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jun 2021, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jun 2021, 8:15 am

Just won't be able to enter many buildings...

Are those my words, little anus?

Rock » 15 Jun 2021, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jun 2021, 2:10 pm

Poor little fella's having a meltdown because he's being ignored.     

Taipan » 13 Jun 2021, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jun 2021, 11:07 am

Dr. Aruna Khilanani.
Psychiatrist.   NYC.   From Yale.
Is this how the Dems think about the Gringos?
Could you keep your job if you said this in public about the ****** ?
Maybe the Dems think that the Gringos are the new *** in town and you can spit on the
Gringos if you want to.

Kamala said that she is an advocate for all of the millions of wetbacks who come here through
the Biden/Harris Open Border Catastrophe.      Why?     Did Kamala raise bail-money for racist,
BLM looters who also torched many Dem cities last summer?   Yes, she did.
Is it true that Dems are now seeking the demise of Capitalist, White, Christian,  America ?
(I think so).

https://youtu.be/-cgWILpNKoY

Rock » 14 Jun 2021, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 8:32 pm

That isn't an answer.

sootedupCyndi » 14 Jun 2021, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jun 2021, 1:23 pm

only thing I remember was Ron Brown... poor guy., his plane hit the side of a mountain.. It was so long ago OMH? I remember a lawyer in a wheel chair..  him too..