StrictlyCashNCarry » Yesterday, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:47 am

You seriously can't think of one statute that you'd repeal?

I can think of some.  Can you?

MLK was a communist who sold out his own people. Malcolm X's separatist approach was better, but he gets vilified in schools.

Isabel » Yesterday, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:05 pm

There was no false information, you fat, lying little Pig.

YOU:   Yes, you did.

No, I didn't, fat, lying little Pig.

YOU:   You attacked three black ladies and called them texas trumpy hick cowards, on the FALSE information that they were anti-vaxers (fed you by your media, which trusts you to be a stupid gull).

Keep pretending that what THEIR LAWYER is claiming is "proof",. because watching fat little pigs like you dance around in a panic is ALWAYS funny.

YOU:   Now, screech another lie. DO IT.

You poor, fat, desperately lying little Pig.

Oh good. Isabel is back.   

FOS » Yesterday, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:34 pm

Lol. Not randomly. Something forces it. It isn't some law of physics. Things have to make the pendulum swing in questions of power.

In the 30s, our government was forced to pass financial laws preventing the glut we saw under bush and every president since. We saw 50 years of zero bailouts - bank failures being both rare and handled in house by the fdic.

When that generation died out, they got rid of glass steagal - with the assistance of libertardian rubes who want to "get rid of regalayshuns." 

Not a decade has passed since reagan that we did not have massive bailouts of the financial sector (banks). 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:02 pm

It is.  But I’m not triggered.  When you get the Politicians to go CD after the criminals with guns you will have a discussion starting point.

Kind of proving my point.  Guns are sacred cows.  
 

ScottMon » Yesterday, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:29 pm

you're not a libertarian.  You hate Jews with a passion.

how would I ever be stupid enough to be a libertarian?

I am, as advertised, a fascist.

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:08 pm

MSM will turn that around. Stupid people's votes count too.

Not with cnn losing 90% of their viewers they won't. They really miss Trump!

 


https://nypost.com/2022/01/12/cnn-sees- ... -coverage/

ScottMon » Yesterday, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:24 pm

I read your thread.  Crazytrain said he didn't care.  The Cons made penis jokes.  A true libertarian doesn't care if you're whatever.

a true libertarian is a perfect nihilist. Cares about nothing, and doesn't matter to anyone.

ScottMon » Yesterday, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:20 pm

Statistics show otherwise.  

Black People Are Wrongly Convicted Of Murder More Often, Data Show : The Two-Way : NPR

Blacks are convicted of half the murders, not surprising they also get half the exonerations. Anything less would be statistically surprising. 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:18 pm

Why?

which countries have highest test scores?

China and Singapore.  Do they have high diversity?  No, their entire country is slant eyed Orientals

I tried, but I have been caught. This is Vegas. 

     

I wanted to do this experiment to see how far lefties are willing to agree with transgender women showering with girls/women. It turns out, they are just fine with it. @Pengwin  and  @Crazytrain  especially had no issue with it. Hell, I even went as far as to say that I get aroused when showering with the high school girls swim team. They still didn't push back. 

You lefties are scum. 

I would vote for anybody who promises to fight this Covid retardation, I am DONE with masks and I don’t want a vaccine

Huey » Yesterday, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:42 pm

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- On average, Americans' political party preferences in 2021 looked similar to prior years, with slightly more U.S. adults identifying as Democrats or leaning Democratic (46%) than identified as Republicans or leaned Republican (43%).

 However, the general stability for the full-year average obscures a dramatic shift over the course of 2021, from a nine-percentage-point Democratic advantage in the first quarter to a rare five-point Republican edge in the fourth quarter.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/388781/pol ... -2021.aspx

May not bode well for the midterms:

Both the nine-point Democratic advantage in the first quarter and the five-point Republican edge in the fourth quarter are among the largest Gallup has measured for each party in any quarter since it began regularly measuring party identification and leaning in 1991.

MSM will turn that around. Stupid people's votes count too.

ScottMon » Yesterday, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:14 pm

Actually, Its the same damn thing all over again.  BLM is retreading the path of MLK jr because Black folks are still having it rough under the American justice system.

No, it's not nearly the same thing. Mlk fought against very real and very evident racial oppression. One didn't need to turn career criminals into martyrs to see the validity of Kings cause. No dog whistles or hidden systemic racism, you had state guard troops stationed in front of schools to prevent integration. Blm lacks the nobility or justification the civil rights movement enjoyed. 
 

Vegas » Yesterday, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:18 pm

Extra income to poor families
 

**** poor families !
They're multiplying by the day !

They're mostly colored anyway  . . .  with dozens of kids they cannot feed and sell into prostitution and not one father .

They in turn will spawn kids from the age of 12  . . .  and again no fathers.

They call it a  "vicious circle" !

So you're number one...so what?

Djokovic flies out of Australia after losing court appeal

Get vaccinated, get tested or get TF out.  Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, "We are keeping our borders strong and keeping Australians safe."

Can't imagine you alt-right schmucks would be upset with the Australian government considering how keeping borders safe is so important to you...even though the Djoker is an anti-vaxxer.

If more people listened to him about judging people on their character and not the color of their skin we would have been better off the past few years.

 

Flanker » Yesterday, 5:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:11 pm

Flanker: Mr. President, don't you feel bad cause 13 GIs were killed in a terror bombing at the end of your pullout from Afghanistan?
Biden: Yes.
Flanker: Can America feel bettor cause no more GIs are dying in Afghanistan?
Biden: Yes.
Flanker: Mr. President, 60 GIs were killed in the Trump years and many more in the other administrations before Trump. Do you you take pride in that low number of only 13 GIs lost during your administration?
Biden: No.
Flanker: Mr. President, when previous presidents hesitated, you acted. Did America do the right thing by pulling out of an apparently endless war in Afghanistan?
Biden: Yes.

BIDEN **** UP AMERICANS DIED

Vegas » Yesterday, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:18 pm

As some may be aware, I have a strong dedication to education. I have always maintained that there cannot possibly be a negative effect on creating an educated populace. This is a good article on why poor students underperform in school. It isn't because they are stupid. Kids from poor families don't have the basic needs taken care of such as food, shelter, clothes, and parental involvement. How does a child learn when they are hungry? They may eat a **** meal at school, and that is it for the rest of the day. 

Here is what the research found: 

• Poor families who received an extra $3000 in government assistance had a significant increase in test scores vs those who did not receive assistance. 
• There is no lack of data that shows a strong correlation between poverty and low educational performance. 

A counter argument states that America spends more money per student than most any other nation on Earth, yet we still have poor performance with respect to the rest of the developed world. 

My response is that the money is not being allotted correctly. The money spent is used for books, teacher salaries, building costs, etc...It doesn't address the root cause, which is poverty. 

My solution is to follow the overwhelming research. Provide money to impoverished families so they can at least have three meals a day, a decent apartment/home, and the basic needs.

With all due respect to your very valid points, I've really got to ask how it is that those poor who you refer to that send their kids to school hungry, are either not taking advantage of the federal food stamp program, or are simply not spending it for it's intended purposes for their children.  I refuse to believe that those recipients can't afford to spend a couple of bucks a day of that welfare money to give their kid a couple of eggs and toast for breakfast, and a tuna sandwich for lunch.  This isn't and should not be the responsibility of the schools, nor should the hard-working taxpayer be forced to pay for those meals twice, first for the food stamp fund and later to pay a stipend to the school. 

Before I'd ask taxpayers to spend another $3000 per family, I'd want to see why their parents are not taking their responsibility seriously, and not simply cover up their abuse of that welfare they're already getting.  And one more thing.  Before sending another nickel their way, they should be required to take a drug test, just to confirm that this is not where their welfare money is going.  Why shouldn't those taking welfare fall under the same criteria as those required to take a drug test prior to getting hired for a job?  How is it that one is perfectly acceptable, and the other is an inhumane and unfair requirement steeped in racism that causes such great humiliation?

Do you find that so unreasonable?