If it were possible, clemjob w3ould be the guy.
That fruit cake offered up a chart into evidence, in a thread where he and I were disputing. I tried to read the chart and found it imenetrable. So I tracked it to where it came from. I was unablee to find the key, there. But theat site had only modified it. I tracked it to its origin, No help - their original was comprehensible - it was the unexpplained modification which was the problem. I went BACK to that site and eventually gave up.
I had spent 45 minutes attempting to give his evidence a fair hearing.
I admitted ignorance and requested assistance comprehending his proffered chart. He snarled that it looked substantially like most of the other charts which people generallly used as evidence in debates such as we were having, and called me a psycho.
So, this lazy piece of death camp fodder has the audacity to call me psycho for asking HIM what evidence that HE entered means? After I spent 45 minutes acting like a man, this fucking monkey snarls at me, and calls ME psrcho to cover for the laziness and dishonesty injerent in postijng evidence one does not understand, simply because it comes from a wingnut site and so must mean SOMETHING "one's side" stands for - just toss it, so much chaff...
If I catch that cocksucker correct 15 times it will not make that piece of train-bait right ONCE. The pig is wrong forever. The day will coe that I'll have him in my basement. That's where I keep my power tools. a crude lobotomy will probably teach neither of us anything. But it will make him slower at ducking darts and pellets.