If you post in a peanut gallery thread and your post is missing, this is where you can find it.
Forum rules
THIS IS THE PEANUT GALLERY FORUM. WE ADVISE YOU NOT TO POST HERE.

YOU WILL FIND THE ACTUAL THREADS IN ANOTHER FORUM - MOST LIKELY IN THE NHB.
User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 4,831

Under this plan he may have to pay 10 billion a year.  And he is crying about it on twitter.  It's long overdue.  And he sure diesnt cry about the tax incentives we give him to buy his cars

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-mu ... ll-2021-10
 

User avatar
Taipan

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,285
Politics: Libertarian

Vegasgiants » 27 Oct 2021, 9:58 am » wrote: Under this plan he may have to pay 10 billion a year.  And he is crying about it on twitter.  It's long overdue.  And he sure doesn't cry about the tax incentives we give him to buy his cars

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-mu ... ll-2021-10

Musk.
Bezos.
Zuckerberg.

What percentage do you wish to see the billionaires pay in taxes ?

User avatar
ConsRule

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 1,838
Politics: Conservative

It appears the discussion is moot anyway:

Democrats have already nixed a contentious plan to tax the wealth of roughly 700 billionaires, Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) confirmed Wednesday, after moderate Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) voiced concerns earlier in the day over the proposed provision in President Joe Biden's spending package.

At a press conference Wednesday, Neal, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said the proposal was “out of the Biden plan” after Manchin, whose support is crucial for Democrats to pass legislation in the evenly split Senate, told reporters he didn't like the billionaire tax.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanpo ... 052c99bc36
 
 

User avatar
ConsRule

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 1,838
Politics: Conservative

Vegasgiants » 27 Oct 2021, 2:42 pm » wrote: I see.  They can define a black man as counting as 3/5  of a person for representation but they can not define income?

Even YOU called it income.

Its income if the feds say it is income

We changed that part of the Constitution.  Just how **** stupid are you?
 

User avatar
ITS_ALL_TRUMPS_FAULT

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,875

Vegasgiants » 27 Oct 2021, 10:30 am » wrote: No idea what you are referring to
YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHO BRANDON WAS UNTIL TODAY!


Image
 
 
 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests