This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
User avatar
nefarious101

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,186

 Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested
  • Operation Lone Star was created by Abbott amidst a wave of illegal immigrants from Honduras and El Salvador crossing the US-Mexico border 
  • Judge Jan Soifer ruled in favor of Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an Ecuadorian engineer arrested in September and charged with trespassing 
  • Angelica Cogliano, Curipoma's lawyer, said that Operation Lone Star was unconstitutional because it tries to supersede federal immigration law 
  • She added that Curipoma was jailed rather than being considered for asylum, which is within his right 
  • Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, acting on behalf of the state, actually agreed with the argument that Operation Lone Star violates federal law
  • David A. Schulman filed on behalf of the state in Kinney County, where he argued the case should be heard, because that's where Curipoma was arrested
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... IONAL.html
 

User avatar
ConsRule

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,081
Politics: Conservative

nefarious101 » 14 Jan 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote:  Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested
  • Operation Lone Star was created by Abbott amidst a wave of illegal immigrants from Honduras and El Salvador crossing the US-Mexico border 
  • Judge Jan Soifer ruled in favor of Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an Ecuadorian engineer arrested in September and charged with trespassing 
  • Angelica Cogliano, Curipoma's lawyer, said that Operation Lone Star was unconstitutional because it tries to supersede federal immigration law 
  • She added that Curipoma was jailed rather than being considered for asylum, which is within his right 
  • Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, acting on behalf of the state, actually agreed with the argument that Operation Lone Star violates federal law
  • David A. Schulman filed on behalf of the state in Kinney County, where he argued the case should be heard, because that's where Curipoma was arrested
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... IONAL.html

This will probably be overturned on appeal.  They were arrested for violating Texas drug trafficking laws, gun trafficking and trespassing on private property in Texas...not immigration violations.  Federal law does not apply to trespassing on private property.  And we need to know who actually made the arrest.  Texas law enforcement officers can arrest people for violating Texas law.  The Texas National Guard can legally (constitutionally) provide support services to Texas law enforcement officers without violating the posse comitatus.
 

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

nefarious101 » 14 Jan 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote:  Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested
  • Operation Lone Star was created by Abbott amidst a wave of illegal immigrants from Honduras and El Salvador crossing the US-Mexico border 
  • Judge Jan Soifer ruled in favor of Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an Ecuadorian engineer arrested in September and charged with trespassing 
  • Angelica Cogliano, Curipoma's lawyer, said that Operation Lone Star was unconstitutional because it tries to supersede federal immigration law 
  • She added that Curipoma was jailed rather than being considered for asylum, which is within his right 
  • Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, acting on behalf of the state, actually agreed with the argument that Operation Lone Star violates federal law
  • David A. Schulman filed on behalf of the state in Kinney County, where he argued the case should be heard, because that's where Curipoma was arrested
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... IONAL.html
" Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested"


Good, all immigration is a Federal Matter, period - end of debate.

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

ConsRule » 14 Jan 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote:  Federal law does not apply to trespassing on private property.  
"Trespassing" as Illegal Immigrants seeking Asylum. 

The court is not fooled by Abbott's Election Antics.

He might as well have tried arresting them for littering.
 

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 16,635
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
nefarious101 » 14 Jan 2022, 3:30 pm » wrote:  Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested
  • Operation Lone Star was created by Abbott amidst a wave of illegal immigrants from Honduras and El Salvador crossing the US-Mexico border 
  • Judge Jan Soifer ruled in favor of Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, an Ecuadorian engineer arrested in September and charged with trespassing 
  • Angelica Cogliano, Curipoma's lawyer, said that Operation Lone Star was unconstitutional because it tries to supersede federal immigration law 
  • She added that Curipoma was jailed rather than being considered for asylum, which is within his right 
  • Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza, acting on behalf of the state, actually agreed with the argument that Operation Lone Star violates federal law
  • David A. Schulman filed on behalf of the state in Kinney County, where he argued the case should be heard, because that's where Curipoma was arrested
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... IONAL.html
I believe hey call this intersectionality. 

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 16,635
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: " Texas judge rules apprehension of illegal immigrant by soldiers during Gov Greg Abbott's 'Operation Lone Star' along Rio Grande was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, opening floodgates for claims from others arrested"

Good, all immigration is a Federal Matter, period - end of debate.
https://everipedia-storage.s3-accelerat ... 155709.gif
It's okay, pudn - everyone else can see you. :)

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 16,635
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: "Trespassing" as Illegal Immigrants seeking Asylum. 

The court is not fooled by Abbott's Election Antics.

He might as well have tried arresting them for littering.
https://everipedia-storage.s3-accelerat ... 155709.gif
 
Flail this arms, trigglypuff! :rofl:  


 

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2022, 3:51 pm » wrote: Flail this arms, trigglypuff! Image

I no longer see any image you post.

If you continue then you are just being a child and annoying others...
 

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2022, 3:50 pm » wrote: It's okay, pudn - everyone else can see you. 

They see words, and rational arguments, not your childish, and amazingly repetitive, gifs.
 

User avatar
Blackvegetable

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 30,971

Antifa
Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 3:55 pm » wrote: I no longer see any image you post.

If you continue then you are just being a child and annoying others...
That assumes Jer has options.

User avatar
Cannonpointer

Share      Unread post

User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
Posts: 16,635
Politics: Insurrectionist
Location: Your sister's bedroom - the slutty one

WhistleSNAP
Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 3:56 pm » wrote: They see words, and rational arguments, not your childish, and amazingly repetitive, gifs.
 
They see an excellent rendering of you, fruity. In your habitat. 

User avatar
ConsRule

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,081
Politics: Conservative

Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: "Trespassing" as Illegal Immigrants seeking Asylum. 

The court is not fooled by Abbott's Election Antics.

He might as well have tried arresting them for littering.

Trespassing as in being on someone's private property without permission.  Even "asylum seekers" can commit crimes.

And thanks for the idea...adding a littering charge might be helpful.  When they cannot pay, we can make them do community service.
 

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

ConsRule » 14 Jan 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: Trespassing as in being on someone's private property without permission.  Even "asylum seekers" can commit crimes.
The court didn't buy that argument - because it's ****.

You might as well charge them with Labor Law violations for using children to help hold the ladders as they climb over the wall.

 

User avatar
nefarious101

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,186

Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2022, 3:57 pm » wrote: They see an excellent rendering of you, fruity. In your habitat.

so that's what pengwin looks like.....fat and genderless?

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

nefarious101 » 14 Jan 2022, 4:15 pm » wrote: so that's what pengwin looks like.....fat and genderless?

Don't get him started or there will be 15 more annoying (for you) gifs.

I no longer see them but he posts them anyway.

User avatar
nefarious101

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,186

Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 4:20 pm » wrote: Don't get him started or there will be 15 more annoying (for you) gifs.

I no longer see them but he posts them anyway.

Did he get that off your web cam?

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

nefarious101 » 14 Jan 2022, 4:26 pm » wrote: Did he get that off your web cam?

Do you have an actual comment?
 

User avatar
ConsRule

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 2,081
Politics: Conservative

Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 4:02 pm » wrote: The court didn't buy that argument - because it's ****.

You might as well charge them with Labor Law violations for using children to help hold the ladders as they climb over the wall.
Correction:  THAT court (presided over by a demonrat) didn't buy that argument.
 
 

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,498
Politics: Liberal

ConsRule » 14 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm » wrote: Correction:  THAT court (presided over by a demonrat) didn't buy that argument.

The ruling isn't partisan.  Saying that it is - is nonsense.

Immigration, All immigration, is a Federal (and Federal only) responsibility and duty.

That you aren't happy with it doesn't matter a damn.  You can no more declare War on France than you can play ICE like Abbott did.  He doesn't have that authority.  Federalism, eh?

 

User avatar
Huey

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 17,910
Politics: Liberacon

Pengwin » 14 Jan 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: The ruling isn't partisan.  Saying that it is - is nonsense.

Immigration, All immigration, is a Federal (and Federal only) responsibility and duty.

That you aren't happy with it doesn't matter a damn.  You can no more declare War on France than you can play ICE like Abbott did.  He doesn't have that authority.  Federalism, eh?
If no one was arrested for breaking immigration law it is not a federal issue.   

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot], Arris, Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, Crazytrain, Deezer Shoove, dickens, Doug1943, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Ike Bana, Isabel, Jinn Martini, LibDave, miketx, nefarious101, Neo, PaperLi [Bot], Pengwin, pwingly, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, supraTruth, Taipan, thelion, Vegas, Wayback Machine [Bot], Zeets2 and 613 guests