^ Racist post, attacking democrat nig nogs, from a boozy strumpet - a slack jawed slattern - a scarlet harlot - a loud mouthed shrew - a trailer park tramp - a harridan, a battle ax, a defiled hussy, an intersexed abomination, a peanut butter slut (she'll spread in a Jif), a lipstick whore, a stinkweed of women, a street corner skank, a false-mooing bovine, a beached beluga, a salty-mouthed sea cow, a bellowing ***, a jizz-chinned jezebel, a one-woman suet farm, a greasy-legged street walker, a loud mouthing muslim magnet, a neck-flapped cellulite donor, a hollering horse faced harpy, a practice dummy for mexican rapists, an abortion-happy cum rag, a stark and frightening rebuttal of femininity, a paunchy, drunken guttersnipe, a vile experiment in bloat, an ignorant, misguided slut, a flat-backing floozy, a punch-drunk pudendum pandering pus-bucket, an over-mensing man hater, a yeasty member of the varsity whore squad, an over-sexed midget impersonator, a hairy legged fart dispenser - the original Mad Cow.
Exactly. The rubes don't seem to mind it much when the Republican party whores itself out to farmers whose livelihoods tanked thanks to Trump's trade wars, or when it whores itself out to corporate America and billionaires by making it possible for them to pay zero in taxes, or by passing off a big GIVEAWAY to the filthy rich as some middle-class tax cut (NOT). Nor do they mind when the GOP whores itself out to the NRA, "proud" boys, neo-Nazis, supremacists, and similar vermin. Not to mention the fact that 11 OF THE LAST TEN RECESSIONS OCCURRED UNDER A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION.
Vegas » wrote:You're just a **** coward. Everyone knows it. You **** cone on here and lie every day and get pissy when I make you look foolish over it.Huey » 19 Nov 2021, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑
Not worth the trouble. Dude's an idiot. When he sees this he will most likely troll me from thread to thread.
Run away stewardess. Lol
I hear ya. Don't sweat it, but m just messing with you too.
Here’s a chart of the exponential growth of Trump’s cumulative “untruths”:Washington Post
Before Obama I respected the anti war movement. Found them perhaps naive but genuine. When they packed their **** up after Obama was elected, not to return when he expanded on Bush's wars, they lost me. When they came out in force after anti war candidate Trump won they revealed themselves to be partisan hacks with shallow convictions.Omicron420 » 29 Nov 2021, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑
--Turn the left into another War Party
--Extinguish all anti-war sentiment in the left
--Extinguish all anti establishment thought in the left
It was Obama that made war cool for them. He made the DC Estab cool for them.
High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [].
In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older []. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) []. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease []. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties []. Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.
Oh wow!! Seeing that no where in science will you find a "neuter" gender anywhere!!
Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot], Annoyed Liberall, Beekeeper, Buffalo, ConsRule, Crazytrain, DeplorablePatriot, dickens, FJB, FOS, GHETTO BLASTER, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Ike Bana, Isabel, Jinn Martini, leftist, LibDave, nefarious101, Neo, neue regel, OdeToJoy, PaperLi [Bot], Pengwin, Polar1ty, PoliticalPopUp, pwingly, Semrush [Bot], SharminSultana, SJConspirator, Steve Jobs [Bot], supraTruth, Taipan, thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 595 guests