Well, here's the thing about the thing.roadkill » 24 Nov 2022, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Would it be subject to government smooth talk and adjustments to take us back to where we were in the first place? Cause we all know the gov. wants a significant slice of the pie to keep their own interests intact.
I would NEVER allow idiotic leftists to hijack our language and tell us what can and can't be said because it might "offend" some ignorant liberal. The truth is that now I'll go out of my way to refer to it PRECISELY in the manner they object to! The virus known as Monkeypox was named because it was first discovered in 1958 IN A COLONY OF MONKEYS! Accuracy should NEVER be substituted in order to appease the most ignorant in our society.TB7 » 28 Nov 2022, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ Monkeypox renamed mpox after WHO cites racism concernsLONDON (AP) — The World Health Organization has renamed monkeypox as mpox, citing concerns that the original name of the decades-old animal disease could be construed as discriminatory and racist.
The U.N. health agency said in a statement Monday that mpox was its new preferred name for monkeypox, saying that both monkeypox and mpox would be used for the next year while the old name is phased out.
WHO said it was concerned by the “racist and stigmatizing language” that arose after monkeypox spread to more than 100 countries. It said numerous individuals and countries asked the organization “to propose a way forward to change the name.”
Monkeypox renamed mpox after WHO cites racism concerns | WBTW
It literally doesn't. Machinery is superior in every way to simply a mass of bodies.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Lovely...
But it takes labor, cheap and abundant, to actually lay the track and work the fields.
It isn't worth much as theory.
Vegas » 01 Dec 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I would say it's far more than 50% that can't afford it. They have kids anyway, though they can't afford to support them adequately. Thus, the government writes them checks.
America, generally speaking, has been founded on the idea that everyone should have equal opportunity to attain their own wealth. This is a beautiful theory, but hardly crosses over to application. As soon as we liberated ourselves from Britain, we used exploitation, not freedom for all, as a means to accumulate wealth. It hasn't changed. Therefore, there will always be more than 50% who left out to dry.
No one. I'm not calling for it nationally, but on the state and local level.
nuckinfutz » 04 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I see that you are LATE again to the forum! Sleeping in when there is work to be done!
This is why ROME collapsed!![]()
![]()
![]()
@sooted up Cyndi
The DEPTH! The searing, towering intellect!
Well thats a convenient way to try to discredit a general idea by focusing on a detail...right?Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ If you fail Level 1, why credit the uninformed opinion?
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buck Naked, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Chiseler151, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, EDC4ALL!, FJB, FOS, Goodgrief, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hotblack Desiato, Ike Bana, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, maineman, Majik, Makallbuks, Mirabeau, Monderegal, Mrkelly, murdock, NEILCAR, neue regel, Nostradamus' omh, PaperLi [Bot], Pastor Blast, PhiloBeddo, RebelGator, Redheaded Stranger, roadkill, ROG62, ScottMon, SJConspirator, Skans, slideman, sooted up Cyndi, SouthernFried, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], sunburn, Taipan, Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, WindyCocoa, Xavier_Onassis, Yandex [Bot], Z09, Zeets2 and 1 guest