It seems to me, the best outcome you could hope for, is this gets dismissed. I don't think there is any possible way at that point in time, Trump could've known the election wasn't stolen. How could he possibly have established that amongst the sheer quantities of information that exist in the chaos after an election? - the truth is, no one could and no one did. There's no way of instantaneously demonstrating the truth one way or the other. There were highly concerning anomalies surrounding the election, which Trump quite rightly reacted to and wanted properly investigating. For those of us who don't worship at the alter of Dumb Lemon, we still don't know it wasn't stolen - it's far from being the established, settled fact MSNBCNN would like you to think it isSquatchman » 05 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm » wrote: ↑ It's going to be fun to watch.
Trump's best defense is to say he was stupid and gullible for listening to his terrible advisors.
If he doesn't he admits to knowing there was no election fraud to begin with and that he was in on everything.
He's stuck between saying he's a ******* or admitting defeat.
Trump has been played like a fiddle by Jack Smith.
I gave it an extra nod because the logic really spoke to me.JustinSane » 22 Aug 2023, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems to me, the best outcome you could hope for, is this gets dismissed. I don't think there is any possible way at that point in time, Trump could've known the election wasn't stolen. How could he possibly have established that amongst the sheer quantities of information that exist in the chaos after an election? - the truth is, no one could and no one did. There's no way of instantaneously demonstrating the truth one way or the other. There were highly concerning anomalies surrounding the election, which Trump quite rightly reacted to and wanted properly investigating. For those of us who don't worship at the alter of Dumb Lemon, we still don't know it wasn't stolen - it's far from being the established, settled fact MSNBCNN would like you to think it is
Which leads to point 1 in the trial. You're going to have to demonstrate it actually wasn't stolen - if you can't, then the question of proving anyone knew it wasn't stolen becomes a logical impossibility. Pro-tip, anyone involved, whether in a primary, secondary or tertiary fashion will be dead of boredom or old-age, long before this question is resolved to a satisfactory, evidentiary standard
Point 2) Assuming you get through point 1, you're then going to have to demonstrate that Trump actually knew it wasn't stolen in that period right after the election. Well that's a total bloody nonsense since you're probably going to spend decades in this court case, establishing it wasn't stolen (the onus is on your side), and will, in all likelihood, fail to do so. But either way, the sheer colossal complexity of demonstrating point 1, innately demonstrates that point 2 (Trump knew it wasn't stolen), couldn't possibly have been the case at any point in time
Point 3) This is an excellent opportunity to actually bring to light and properly litigate all of those concerns and anomalies that got pushed aside - which combined, will pretty much destroy the possibility of point 1 and point 2 ever being established. Without point 1 and 2, there simply is no case against Trump. Even having established those, you then have to get past presidential immunity and Trump's own constitutional rights. Jack ****, has fabricated his very own quagmire.
1 Nomination
Neo Aug 05, 2023
Go to original post on Aug 06, 2023 2:20am
Go to nomination on Aug 06, 2023 5:30am
After watching a million Americans die from having been sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma, government and media profits - who could have virtually all otherwise been saved through early treatment in the comfort of their homes for $20 - who is going to believe a government that has been captured by the military industrial complex, let alone Big Pharma, the Illness Industry, Big Ag, food processors/devitalizers, etc. etc.Sumela » 23 Aug 2023, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ Play dumb games....
win dumb prizes.
Burn in hell war pig.![]()
------------------------------------------------------
MARIA@its_maria012 Aug 21
American Major General Anthony Potts has been killed in a Russian missile strike
at the NATO HQ in the Ukrainian city of Dnepropetrovsk. The US Military admits his death,
but claims he was killed in a "plane crash". Which narrative do you believe?
razoo » 28 Aug 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ YOU don't know if it's being pushed on minors = you are nothing but pure unadulterated speculation and in this case you may be lying.
Wow
THIS POST WON A DOUBLE POST OF THE DAY
Wow
Its the greatest evil we face as a country and a culture. IMHO.
A vote delay caused by conservative protesters was called an insurrection. A threat to democracy. An act of civil war. I expect the same treatment here or it will be further proof of a multi tiered justice system favoring a political view.Kobia2 » 30 Sep 2023, 10:55 pm » wrote: ↑ He intentionally pulled that Fire Alarm to delay a House Funding Vote .... Then the lying pos said he was in a rush to participate in the Vote and mistook the Alarm for a Knob to open the Door he was supposedly trying to enter....
Golf agreed.... Where are the screams from the hysterical Democrats & MSM about him attempting to interfere with the Government's ability to function? This ******* is a male member of "The Squad", who whips out the Race-Card like a Puerto Rican pulls a Switchblade....
Users browsing this forum: Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buck Naked, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Jantje_Smit, jerra b, Kobia2, MackTheFinger, Majik, Mirabeau, Mrkelly, murdock, neue regel, PhiloBeddo, PoliticalPopUp, RebelGator, roadkill, Semrush [Bot], Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Str8tEdge, Sumela, sunburn, tsmco, Twitter [Bot], walkingstick, Yandex [Bot], Z09 and 1 guest