Fair Trial for the Missouri Couple who Defended their Home? Naaaah..

This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
177 posts
User avatar
Rock

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,036
Politics: Conservative

IkeBana » 30 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm » wrote: Why do you "law and order" types hate the law so much?  I know!  It's because of all that pesky "equal under the law" **** in the Constitution.

You're like the male version of Isabel. 
Log in or Register to remove ads


User avatar
Al Donal

Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 1,702

righteous » 30 Jul 2020, 8:13 pm » wrote: The crowd of BLM pets. It would be animal cruelty if they were extinguished.
 The McSchlotzskys seem nice. But they don’t live on a Ranch. Dressing: They seem to be Dressing like professionals. Right now, they’re in a Pickle. Look, I don’t care how they make their Bread, they’re attorneys, I think. Lettuce just leave them alone to their Tomato gardening. Split it in half and save it for later. Don’t forget the Cheese. They worked hard for that Cheese.
 

righteous

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 966

AlDonal » 30 Jul 2020, 8:45 pm » wrote:  The McSchlotzskys seem nice. But they don’t live on a Ranch. Dressing: They seem to be dressing like professionals. Right now, they’re in a Pickle. Look, I don’t care how they make their Bread, they’re attorneys, I think. Lettuce just leave them alone to their Tomato gardening. Split it in half and save it for later. Don’t forget the Cheese. They worked hard for that Cheese.
The McCloskeys don't live on a chicken farm. Left wings escaped the coup, got lost thought they were on the farm, can't find their way to the slaughter house. The Right wings will catch up and escort them. They can live without the Left Wing.    

User avatar
Al Donal

Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 1,702

righteous » 30 Jul 2020, 8:59 pm » wrote: The McCloskeys don't live on a chicken farm. Left wings escaped the coup, got lost thought they were on the farm, can't find their way to the slaughter house. The Right wings will catch up and escort them. They can live without the Left Wing.
Holy ****. You came up with a second chapter, and it’s awesome. You really ARE righteous. 
 

righteous

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 966

AlDonal » 30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm » wrote: Holy ****. You came up with a second chapter, and it’s awesome. You really ARE righteous.

You Are AL Don know?

Polar1ty

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 978

Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2020, 1:26 am » wrote: The cares of the world.

One's home is one's retreat. Thus, there is no retreating from one's home - only advancing from one's home.

I can already see that you are committed to pretending to be dense. Sigh. Okay - proceed.

From the mob that crashed through their gate onto their private property, dear. Do you need an aspirin?

Concern for one's safety in one's own home, from which retreat is impossible - from which one can only advance, the home being one's retreat. How can you keep a straight face, playing at being this stupid?

No. Try to keep up.

I'm claiming the mob was making the couple feel unsafe in their home - from which there is no retreat.

No. You've demonstrated bad faith already - I will not treat you as acting otherwise, and bother to prove jack **** to a screeching harridan, so that you can get hysterical and pretend retardation on THAT response.

Google it yourself, or don't. Proving anything to a dishonest retard is impossible, and therefore unworthy of effort.

A lawless mob on private property is a threat even as a stand alone event. In THIS case, elements of that mob had murdered a retired policeman a few days earlier, near the home of the couple.

Uh huh. Instead, you are a dumb-playing douche whose willful ignorance is manifest for all to see - the type who would deny home owners their right to peace and security in their own home. Meanwhile, we all know you would **** yourself if the mob invaded your neighborhood. You almost **** yourself just answering my post.
Yes, she does the Bill Clinton maneuver ("It depends on what the meaning of the word [sex] is.") often, except Bill Clinton is a genius (psychopath) while she's an autist who happened to stumble upon a basic technique that works on low IQ morons.

Basic facts that can easily be Googled or YouTubed are demanded from a Karen. If you don't satisfy her requests, then you "lost" the argument.  

The first time this **** harpy responded to me, she LITERALLY asked me to "prove" that Antifa was left-wing and a subset of "anarchism." (Actually I probably didn't word that 100% accurately - antifa is a subset of the radical left and has HUGE OVERLAP with anarchists, but isn't strictly a subset - but correcting that minuscule error was obviously not her intention)

Easy ignore, not worth 2 s of time.

BTW she is not dishonest.

She is literally a **** autist (I've seen her lose terribly to crimsongulf, and crimsongulf was mostly trolling/not even trying to debate - then she went on some insane off-topic rant which suggests AUTISM) but has the brains to log into a forum and spew drivel. The most unfortunate combination available.
 
 
 

Polar1ty

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 978

Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2020, 1:56 am » wrote: Sigh. What falsely premised pile of dookey did I miss?

Spit it out. I won't have a retard pretending she asked a question I could not field.

Again, tard - what **** question? Spit it out.

An I said **** yourself - and take it how you want. I do not care. I do not pretend dishonest folks are honest. I let any witness reach their own conclusion about that policy - those who think me to be dodging are perfectly welcome to their opinions.

Yes, dear - safety from what you said.

To a retarded partisan ape. To homeowners on a jury, they will mean a not guilty verdict.

Sorry - I lost interest.
Yes, I told you. She asks the most trivial questions and if you refuse to answer, she thinks she won. It was obvious to me, after one **** interaction with her, that spark of stupidity is her typical "strategy," if you could even call it that.

I believe this style of """DEBATE""" can be loosely categorized under the "moving goalposts" fallacy sprinkled on top of "cherry picking." Like I said, not worth another 2 seconds of time.
 

Polar1ty

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 978

Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2020, 1:56 am » wrote: To a retarded partisan ape. To homeowners on a jury, they will mean a not guilty verdict.

Sorry - I lost interest.
LOL I remember under the Shrub, when US soldiers kicked down Afghani and Iraqi residents' doors, conjobs were befuddled why US soldiers were "treated like invaders." The same conjobs are now (correctly) defending this couple's right to defend their property.

The exact opposite is true for liberals and progressives. They knew why US soldiers were "treated like invaders" in Afghanistan and Iraq but think this couple is now in the wrong.  

THESE PEOPLE ARE ALL **** MORONS.

 
 

Ike Bana

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 576

righteous » 30 Jul 2020, 8:13 pm » wrote: The crowd of BLM pets. It would be animal cruelty if they were extinguished.
Don't forget to wear your hood.
 

User avatar
omh

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,538

AlDonal » 30 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm » wrote: Which death threats are you talking about? The death threats received on their pets? Thank god, an animal lover. Good for you.
Treatening to take away their home, life savings, everything they worked for decades that they don't have decades to do over, is removing what they prepared for to survive until dead, leaving them to starve to death under the new rules of social conquest by this mob terrorizing a neighborhood they don't reside in.
when your reality won't explain real completely, you joined a socially corrupt intellectual mind that won't tolerate you using your own brain.

User avatar
Huey

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 63,617
Politics: Liberacon

skews13 » 30 Jul 2020, 11:13 am » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jul 2020, 9:38 am » wrote: Let me make myself clear so even you understand.

The community is not open to the public.

Right of way laws do not apply.

MO castle law says you are wrong.

Posted above,  as part of MO law is that in order to be charged with brandishing a weapon the weapon has to be readily capable of lethal fire.  The weapon was NOT readily available for lethal fire.  It had to be filed stripped and reassembled in order for it to be readily capable. 

You view this as the law is written in MO not as you WISH it to be.
Tell that to the local prosecutor dimwit, who doesn’t seem to agree with you.

Nobody gives a rats *** of your interpretation of Missouri laws. 

There is only one interpretation that’s relevant here, and that would be the prosecutor who brings the charges 

What you think doesn’t count.

After that, it is up to the judge or jury to issue a verdict.

You don’t have any say so in that decision either, and nobody gives a rats *** of your opinion in that decision either.

So let me give you the same advice I find myself constantly giving dimwits, usually of the conservative variety.

Sit down shut the **** up and mind your own **** business.

 
 
Huey » 30 Jul 2020, 11:32 am » wrote:
skews13 » 30 Jul 2020, 11:13 am » wrote: Tell that to the local prosecutor dimwit, who doesn’t seem to agree with you.

Nobody gives a rats *** of your interpretation of Missouri laws. 

There is only one interpretation that’s relevant here, and that would be the prosecutor who brings the charges 

What you think doesn’t count.

After that, it is up to the judge or jury to issue a verdict.

You don’t have any say so in that decision either, and nobody gives a rats *** of your opinion in that decision either.

So let me give you the same advice I find myself constantly giving dimwits, usually of the conservative variety.

Sit down shut the **** up and mind your own **** business.

The governor agrees with me.  The MO AG agrees with me.  

The interpretation of MO law is their's.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief in the case of Mark and Patricia McCloskey supporting the Castle Doctrine law and seeking dismissal of the charges filed against the couple Monday evening.

https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local ... 0eb91d4c94

Gov. Mike Parson (R) told Fox News Monday "without a doubt" he would pardon Mark and Patricia McCloskey if they're convicted over pulling guns on anti-racism protesters outside their mansion.

https://www.axios.com/missouri-governor ... bff31.html


So I suggest YOU sit down and STFU and learn the facts of the case before opening your yap again.  

 

Missouri AG intervenes in case against St. Louis couple who defended their home with guns  I told you to listen to them  So again, Sit down and STFU.

Editor note: A previous version of this story suggested all charges were dropped against the couple.  That is not yet formally the case.  The Missouri AG is still seeking to dismiss the case.  We’ll be sure to keep you updated on this breaking story as new details become available.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/mis ... with-guns/

More from the article:

The McCloskey’s who are both attorneys, were eating dinner on their patio when several hundred Black Lives Matter protesters, tore down a gate to gain access to a private community that was clearly marked as private with “No Trespassing” signs. 

And“As Missouri’s chief law enforcement officer, I simply will not stand by while Missouri laws are being ignored.That is why I am entering the case in terms of seeking the dismissal of the case to protect the rights of Missourians to defend themselves in their property under Missouri’s castle doctrine.”He continued:“This includes the Missouri castle doctrine, which provides broad rights for Missourians to protect and defend their personal safety, and property against those who wish to do them harm.”
“There is No Big There, There”

No further indictments. No instances of obstruction

Alex Vindman-"As the transcript is in the public record, we are aware of what was said"


https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/Read-Alexander-Vindmans-Opening-Statement-on-Trumps-Ukraine-Call-564036951.html


User avatar
skews13

Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,257

Huey » 31 Jul 2020, 8:25 am » wrote:
Missouri AG intervenes in case against St. Louis couple who defended their home with guns  I told you to listen to them  So again, Sit down and STFU.

Editor note: A previous version of this story suggested all charges were dropped against the couple.  That is not yet formally the case.  The Missouri AG is still seeking to dismiss the case.  We’ll be sure to keep you updated on this breaking story as new details become available.

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/mis ... with-guns/

More from the article:

The McCloskey’s who are both attorneys, were eating dinner on their patio when several hundred Black Lives Matter protesters, tore down a gate to gain access to a private community that was clearly marked as private with “No Trespassing” signs. 

And“As Missouri’s chief law enforcement officer, I simply will not stand by while Missouri laws are being ignored.That is why I am entering the case in terms of seeking the dismissal of the case to protect the rights of Missourians to defend themselves in their property under Missouri’s castle doctrine.”He continued:“This includes the Missouri castle doctrine, which provides broad rights for Missourians to protect and defend their personal safety, and property against those who wish to do them harm.”
News Flash: The local prosecutor has decided to not press charges in the case.

All of you snow flake ammosexuals in this thread, can change your tampons, and drink some water to help with your hot flashes.
 

User avatar
Huey

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 63,617
Politics: Liberacon

skews13 » 31 Jul 2020, 9:37 am » wrote: News Flash: The local prosecutor has decided to not press charges in the case.

All of you snow flake ammosexuals in this thread, can change your tampons, and drink some water to help with your hot flashes.

I wonder why?  I told you who to listen to.  You thought YOU knew better.  You were wrong.  Don't come after me again with your weak ignorant loinfo talking points.

As far as ammosexual I am not sure what that is.  BV tends to use that line a lot.  Maybe you two can define it.  

 
“There is No Big There, There”

No further indictments. No instances of obstruction

Alex Vindman-"As the transcript is in the public record, we are aware of what was said"


https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/politics/Read-Alexander-Vindmans-Opening-Statement-on-Trumps-Ukraine-Call-564036951.html


User avatar
omh

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,538

skews13 » 31 Jul 2020, 9:37 am » wrote: News Flash: The local prosecutor has decided to not press charges in the case.

All of you snow flake ammosexuals in this thread, can change your tampons, and drink some water to help with your hot flashes.
Look at you trying to project your side just didn't get slapped down and your side still is invincible. It isn't.
when your reality won't explain real completely, you joined a socially corrupt intellectual mind that won't tolerate you using your own brain.

righteous

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 966

IkeBana » 31 Jul 2020, 6:24 am » wrote: Don't forget to wear your hood.
The white one that covers my AK47. Ok

Ike Bana

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 576

Rock » 30 Jul 2020, 8:30 pm » wrote: You're like the male version of Isabel.
You're like the male version of Lieselotte Meier.
 
 

User avatar
Rock

Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 6,036
Politics: Conservative

IkeBana » 31 Jul 2020, 9:04 pm » wrote: You're like the male version of Lieselotte Meier.

Who's that?

User avatar
skews13

Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,257

IkeBana » 31 Jul 2020, 9:04 pm » wrote: You're like the male version of Lieselotte Meier.

You do realize the level of education you are speaking to in this thread right?


righteous

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 966

IkeBana » 31 Jul 2020, 9:04 pm » wrote: You're like the male version of Lieselotte Meier.
Sieg Heil! You Banana. One **** Vegetable and one fruitcake on the site. An eggplant and you Banana Brain
 
 
Last edited by righteous on 31 Jul 2020, 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

righteous

Unread post

   
   
Posts: 966

righteous » 31 Jul 2020, 9:18 pm » wrote: Sieg Heil! You Banana. One **** Vegetable and one fruitcake on the site. An eggplant and you Banana brain
 
 

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Allota Bologna, Annoyed Liberall, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Cedar, Crazytrain, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], iamtogtogiam, Ike Bana, Isabel, KFSW, Majestic-12 [Bot], nefarious101, NeoConvict, neue regel, Olivaw, OpenSiteExplorer [Bot], Pastafarian, Pengwin, Ricky Tavy, RollingRock, Semrush [Bot], simple jack, skews13, sooted up Cyndi, Steve Jobs [Bot], Termin8tor, Vegas, WillFranklin, Yandex [Bot] and 819 guests


Log in or Register to remove ads