They will probably call her a privileged ***.Rock » 24 Aug 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A strong black woman who says it like it is. Now the libs here will call her an Uncle/Aunt Tom in 3....2....1....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rYc3QcPX8
At least we do celebrate. Your convention looked more like a wake, with no alcohol.Crazytrain » 24 Aug 2020, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ They celebrate when they get one black person. Kinda sad.
They’ll think of something.Rock » 24 Aug 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A strong black woman who says it like it is. Now the libs here will call her an Uncle/Aunt Tom in 3....2....1....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rYc3QcPX8
They have to do something about Kamala, so they went to Planet Black Folks and brought back Kim Klacik.Crazytrain » 24 Aug 2020, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑ They celebrate when they get one black person. Kinda sad.
I see she is the new Mia Love kitchen ***, and will last just as long.Rock » 24 Aug 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A strong black woman who says it like it is. Now the libs here will call her an Uncle/Aunt Tom in 3....2....1....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rYc3QcPX8
Rock » 24 Aug 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A strong black woman who says it like it is. Now the libs here will call her an Uncle/Aunt Tom in 3....2....1....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rYc3QcPX8
Rock » 24 Aug 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑ A strong black woman who says it like it is. Now the libs here will call her an Uncle/Aunt Tom in 3....2....1....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rYc3QcPX8
Pengwin » 25 Aug 2020, 1:47 am » wrote: ↑ She has nice teeth, and a decent voice, but the problem is she is way too much House *** to get to the rest of her race. Her dogma plays even worse from her black skin than from the white skin.
What she needs to do is stand in the middle and call a spade a spade. *** for Trump is roughly as popular as Jews for Hitler. Until she can be honest about that she's just preaching to the choir.
Maybe it's a shame, but it's true. Her dog won't hunt.
Plantation Nation. Always has been, always will be. We founded it that way - when ***, and women, and children, and land, and animals were property.Cannonpointer » 25 Aug 2020, 3:27 am » wrote: ↑ And there it is - the predictable racism when a negress tries to get off the democrat plantation.
Pengwin » 25 Aug 2020, 4:02 am » wrote: ↑ Plantation Nation. Always has been, always will be. We founded it that way - when ***, and women, and children, and land, and animals were property.
Want to fix it 230 years later - yes, or no?
.
Have you heard of this?
When the french lost quebec to the british, thousands of arcadians fled down the mississippi, and did not debark until they hit briny swamps. These arcadians came to be known as cajuns. They scavenged for food and lived squalid lives of poverty, while the mulatto scions of french aristocracy lived bourgeois lives as educated craftsmen and professionals in New Orleans and Baton Rouge. This is what the americans encountered when they took over - it was quite embarrassing to their narrative that blacks are inherently inferior. Lol. It took them generations to bring the blacks down - and they never did bring the cajuns up. They remain white *** to this day.Famagusta » 25 Aug 2020, 4:18 am » wrote: ↑ Have you heard of this?
White *** of America: The Precocious Autobiography of a Quebec "Terrorist" is a work of non-fiction literature written by Pierre Vallières, a leader of the Front de libération du Québec . It was translated by Joan Pinkham from the original 1968 French language edition titled Nègres blancs d'Amérique, autobiographie précoce d'un « terroriste » québécois. The translation was published by McClelland and Stewart in 1971 (ISBN 0-7710-8670-9). The translated title uses the word "***" as an accurate translation of the equally offensive French word "nègre".
White *** of America chronicles the history of the French colonists of North America, first in the New France colonial empire, and then in British North America. A book about exploitation, author Vallières compares to some extent the plight of these immigrants to that of blacks in the American South, arguing that both groups were forcibly imported to the New World and subsequently exploited by aristocrat capitalists.
I’m starting to become interested in the French colonial history. That central region, stretching up to Quebec. Does that include the Ozarks ?Cannonpointer » 25 Aug 2020, 4:36 am » wrote: ↑ When the french lost quebec to the british, thousands of arcadians fled down the mississippi, and did not debark until they hit briny swamps. These arcadians came to be known as cajuns. They scavenged for food and lived squalid lives of poverty, while the mulatto scions of french aristocracy lived bourgeois lives as educated craftsmen and professionals in New Orleans and Baton Rouge. This is what the americans encountered when they took over - it was quite embarrassing to their narrative that blacks are inherently inferior. Lol. It took them generations to bring the blacks down - and they never did bring the cajuns up. They remain white *** to this day.
Yes, arkansas, and missouri were part of the louisiana purchase. They are the locus of the ozarks.Famagusta » 25 Aug 2020, 4:53 am » wrote: ↑ I’m starting to become interested in the French colonial history. That central region, stretching up to Quebec. Does that include the Ozarks ?
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Bill Gates [Bot], bludog, Buffalo, Cedar, Famagusta, FOS, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Independent, Isabel, nefarious101, neue regel, omh, OpenSiteExplorer [Bot], Pengwin, Polar1ty, PoliticalPopUp, RollingRock, SJConspirator, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Vegas, Yahoo [Bot], Zeets2, zkyll8 and 235 guests