What part of 'get rid of the ballots' do you not understand?
Misty » 23 Sep 2020, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What part of 'get rid of the ballots' do you not understand?
His words, not mine.
He said 'get rid of the ballots.'duck615 » 23 Sep 2020, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑Do you really believe that ****?Misty » 23 Sep 2020, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What part of 'get rid of the ballots' do you not understand?
His words, not mine.
How is 'get rid of the ballots' out of context?duck615 » 23 Sep 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑Why do you take things out of context all the time?
This is why your **** goes to the Peanut Gallery.duck615 » 23 Sep 2020, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑LMFAO, Look no matter what he says... you liberals will twist it to fit your narrative.
How is counting ballots until you get the results you want possibly fair? Its election day, not election month or election season. They managed to do this before highways and air travel.
Sounds like a pretty good plan to me.Misty » 23 Sep 2020, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Today Trump refused to commit to a peacefull transfer of power.
https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1 ... 60352?s=19
"Well, we're going to have to see what happens.
You know that I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots and the ballots are a disaster.
Get rid of the ballots and you'll have a very ... there won't be a transfer, frankly. There'll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control."
So that’s the plan.
Declare victory on election night, and then try to stop the mail-in ballots from being counted.
That's also why he is so adamant about pushing through a SCOTUS nominee before the election.
Trump says Supreme Court will need 9th justice to decide election outcome.
He said “get rid of the ballots” as a suggestion, not a command. It wasn’t an executive order. It was just his typical flow of consciousness ranting.Misty » 23 Sep 2020, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why your **** goes to the Peanut Gallery.
Instead of addressing what Trump said, you accused me of believing **** (his own words BTW) several times and taking things out of context.
I don't need to twist the words 'get rid of the ballots'.
They are pretty self explanatory.
If you think that's not what he meant, then why don't you explain it to me?
As with any president, their words matter.SJConspirator » 23 Sep 2020, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ He said “get rid of the ballots” as a suggestion, not a command. It wasn’t an executive order. It was just his typical flow of consciousness ranting.
Good. Now, get rid of the **** ballots like your president said.
There is a pandemic you know, which is why many more people than usual will be voting by mail.NeoConvict » 23 Sep 2020, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑How is counting ballots until you get the results you want possibly fair? Its election day, not election month or election season. They managed to do this before highways and air travel.
How many people lived in this country before air travel and highways. That's the problem we have with people like you, you want to live in the past. I believe you would be perfectly happy if women could not vote and you could own another human being.NeoConvict » 23 Sep 2020, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ How is counting ballots until you get the results you want possibly fair? Its election day, not election month or election season. They managed to do this before highways and air travel.
Here's a novel idea.Cannonpointer » 23 Sep 2020, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑Sounds like a pretty good plan to me.Misty » 23 Sep 2020, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Today Trump refused to commit to a peacefull transfer of power.
https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1 ... 60352?s=19
"Well, we're going to have to see what happens.
You know that I've been complaining very strongly about the ballots and the ballots are a disaster.
Get rid of the ballots and you'll have a very ... there won't be a transfer, frankly. There'll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control."
So that’s the plan.
Declare victory on election night, and then try to stop the mail-in ballots from being counted.
That's also why he is so adamant about pushing through a SCOTUS nominee before the election.
Trump says Supreme Court will need 9th justice to decide election outcome.
What is your solution - just let the dems steal the election?
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Cedar, ConsRule, Famagusta, FOS, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Independent, ingo, Isabel, Jantje_Smit, JeanMoulin, nefarious101, Neo, Olivaw, omh, OpenSiteExplorer [Bot], Pengwin, Polar1ty, SJConspirator, solon, sooted up Cyndi, Twitter [Bot], Vegas and 267 guests