Judge tosses 'speculative' Trump lawsuit challenging Biden win in Pennsylvania

This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
6 posts
User avatar
Isabel

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,671

Yet ANOTHER contemptuous slap across the mouth for lying Trump traitors and Russian whores.

Judge tosses 'speculative' Trump lawsuit challenging Biden win in Pennsylvania

- A federal judge on Saturday dismissed a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump's campaign that sought to throw out millions of mail-in votes in Pennsylvania, dealing a major blow to Trump's flailing efforts to overturn his Nov. 3 election loss to Democratic President-elect Joe Biden.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, described the case as "strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations."

Judge tosses 'speculative' Trump lawsuit challenging Biden win in Pennsylvania (msn.com)
 
 
 
Log in or Register to remove ads


User avatar
Isabel

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,671

The Trump Clown Show never ends.

User avatar
Coolguy10013

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,369
Politics: Liberal
Location: New York, New York

Isabel » 21 Nov 2020, 8:12 pm » wrote:


 dealing a major blow to Trump's flailing efforts 


 
Flopping like a fish out of water. 
 
When I "dismiss" you it only means that I have determined that further discussion is useless or counter-productive. Don't take it personally. Go ahead and have your last word...and move on.

Stephen Hawking said 'people who boast about their IQ are losers'

User avatar
thelion

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,462
Politics: Capitalist

“Obama appointee” in 3..2..1..

User avatar
Pengwin

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 7,559
Politics: Liberal

thelion » 21 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm » wrote: “Obama appointee” in 3..2..1..
"In rejecting this claim, Brann shredded the Trump legal team’s mix-and-match approach to their argument.

“This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together from two distinct theories in an attempt to avoid controlling precedent,” Brann wrote.

Brann was appointed by President Barack Obama, but is regarded as a conservative judge and an atypical Obama nominee. Brann, who was selected by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), served as a regional Republican Party chairman in Pennsylvania for about a decade before being nominated to the federal bench."
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/2 ... lts-439010
 

User avatar
Coolguy10013

Share      Unread post

User avatar
   
   
Posts: 1,369
Politics: Liberal
Location: New York, New York

Pengwin » 21 Nov 2020, 11:38 pm » wrote: . Brann, who was selected by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), served as a regional Republican Party chairman in Pennsylvania for about a decade before being nominated to the federal bench."
This!! 

There are  actually Republicans out there who follow the letter of the law and not just simply tow the party line. 

Thank goodness!
 
When I "dismiss" you it only means that I have determined that further discussion is useless or counter-productive. Don't take it personally. Go ahead and have your last word...and move on.

Stephen Hawking said 'people who boast about their IQ are losers'

Post Reply

Log in or Register to remove ads