Democrats. Party of censorship.

[Rock]

We must shut up these conservatives.

[FOS]

Well it is basically unfair to allow conservatives to speak. Democrats don't know how to make any valid arguments.

[Vegas]

Opposing views are considered a threat to lefties. They hate liberty for that reason. Liberty allows for a free market of views and opinions. Liberals are so insecure in themselves, that they want nobody to contradict them. They are a cult. May their next **** be square.

[Blackvegetable]

We must shut up these conservatives.

None of you are told what to think..


Yet all bleat the same inane **** on cue.
 

[Blackvegetable]

Opposing views are considered a threat to lefties. They hate liberty for that reason. Liberty allows for a free market of views and opinions. Liberals are so insecure in themselves, that they want nobody to contradict them. They are a cult. May their next **** be square.

Who lost the election by 6 million votes?



@Vegas  

[Blackvegetable]

Well it is basically unfair to allow conservatives to speak. Democrats don't know how to make any valid arguments.

Yes...clearly...the evidence of which is a trashed Capitol.

[FOS]

Yes...clearly...the evidence of which is a trashed Capitol.

See?

That's irrelevant

[Blackvegetable]

See?

That's irrelevant

Everything demonstrable is...

[FOS]

Everything demonstrable is...

No...the fact you failed to construct a valid point is empirical evidence that my claim was true. So it is relevant...and has been demonstrated.

Broken windows in a capitol is irrelevant.

[FOS]

Everything demonstrable is...

On the other thread just now I made a claim that Nazi Germany actually was fairly tolerant toward dissent and you literally tried to prove me wrong by linking an article that showed Nazi Germany was fairly tolerant toward dissent!

You people have no idea how to debate!

[Blackvegetable]

No...the fact you failed to construct a valid point is empirical evidence that my claim was true. So it is relevant...and has been demonstrated.

Broken windows in a capitol is irrelevant.

You're a **** cretin, boy.

You failed to persuade in the election, and got smoked.

You then failed in the courts and legislatures.

Having no argument, you threw a tantrum in the US Capitol.


Damned imbecile.

[Blackvegetable]

On the other thread just now I made a claim that Nazi Germany actually was fairly tolerant toward dissent and you literally tried to prove me wrong by linking an article that showed Nazi Germany was fairly tolerant toward dissent!

You people have no idea how to debate!

No...I'm not kidding when I say this..

You're a lightweight...

Not even...
 

[FOS]

You're a **** cretin, boy.

You failed to persuade in the election, and got smoked.

You then failed in the courts and legislatures.

Having no argument, you threw a tantrum in the US Capitol.

Damned imbecile.

Still irrelevant! Persuasion is not the same as valid logical argument!

And furthermore, the fact that people resorted to a riot is only evidence that you have eliminated peaceful discussion!

[FOS]

No...I'm not kidding when I say this..

You're a lightweight...

Not even...

Still not a valid point! How many posts have we seen where you are unable to make a valid point?

[Blackvegetable]

Still irrelevant! Persuasion is not the same as valid logical argument!

And furthermore, the fact that people resorted to a riot is only evidence that you have eliminated peaceful discussion!

Wait!


Are you suggesting that there was a Logical Argument which drove your fellow inbred ofays to behave as they did?
 

[Blackvegetable]

Still not a valid point! How many posts have we seen where you are unable to make a valid point?

Like when you complain

"No...I don't believe it"


Or when you assert it?
 

[FOS]

Wait!

Are you suggesting that there was a Logical Argument which drove your fellow inbred ofays to behave as they did?

Yes. I believe they were persuaded by logical argument. That is why they do not trust the media you listen to.

[FOS]

Like when you complain

"No...I don't believe it"

Or when you assert it?

If you try to assert something based on authority and I simply reject that authority, this is a valid position.

[Blackvegetable]

If you try to assert something based on authority and I simply reject that authority, this is a valid position.

No...you didn't reject "authority" in that instance, mendacious ****...

You rejected eyewitness accounts.

Just shut your sophomore piehole....you're a poser.
 

[FOS]

No...you didn't reject "authority" in that instance, mendacious ****...

You rejected eyewitness accounts.

Just shut your sophomore piehole....you're a poser.

That is argument from authority. Rejecting your source is perfectly logically consistent.

But EVEN IF you ever found me committing a logical fallacy, then this would just be whataboutism. You are STILL not making a valid point.

I think instead you have proven me correct. After so many posts...not a SINGLE valid point. ALL logical fallacy