https://www.breitbart.com/border/2021/0 ... er-cities/Federal law enforcement sources report that Border Patrol agents will now rely on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to conduct migrant releases when detention space is not available in the Texas Rio Grande Valley. Migrant releases coordinated specifically by Border Patrol directly into border communities will be a last-resort option. Border Patrol officials are instructed to conduct the local releases only when ICE cannot cope with the level of arrests made by the Border Patrol.
The new policy may bring some relief to local shelters in South Texas border communities located in the Rio Grande Valley depending on where ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officials choose to release the migrants. The change in procedure is likely driven by increased media attention to the issue. It will likely result in migrants being released away from border communities in the Rio Grande Valley.
No, I got family there. And they are republican.
Gee, this is so very thoughtful of the Texas sensitivities!PXiZ1102 » 22 Feb 2021, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Exclusive: ICE to Release Migrants Further into U.S. — Away from Texas Border Cities
Central American migrant families recently released from federal detention wait to board a bus at a bus depot on June 12, 2019, in McAllen, Texas. (Photo by Loren ELLIOTT / AFP)
RANDY CLARK
21 Feb 2021
https://www.breitbart.com/border/2021/0 ... er-cities/
The Biden Administration would appreciate it if all of you who opposed the Southern Border Wall, would sign up to invite these illegals to be sent to reside on the streets of your communities.
My condolences.
Hey...****...a whole bunch, if not the majority, of the family destruction generated by Trump’s phony "zero tolerance" program was perped on legitimate asylum seekers who were forced by Trump’s blatant violations of the 1951 Refugee Convention Treaty and agreement, to attempt to enter the country illegally. These asylum seekers and their families were, by this country's signing of The Convention treaty, supposed to have been granted entry into the country pending a case by case adjudication by immigration judges on the validity of their applications for asylum. In violation of the treaty these families were separated and the parents of children forced to return to possible imprisonment and/or death in their countries of origin. Asylum seekers are not "illegals" unless and until an immigration judge rules so.PXiZ1102 » 22 Feb 2021, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ The Biden Administration would appreciate it if all of you who opposed the Southern Border Wall, would sign up to invite these illegals to be sent to reside on the streets of your communities.
IkeBana » 22 Feb 2021, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey...****...a whole bunch, if not the majority, of the family destruction generated by Trump’s phony "zero tolerance" program was perped on legitimate asylum seekers who were forced by Trump’s blatant violations of the 1951 Refugee Convention Treaty and agreement, to attempt to enter the country illegally. These asylum seekers and their families were, by this country's signing of The Convention treaty, supposed to have been granted entry into the country pending a case by case adjudication by immigration judges on the validity of their applications for asylum. In violation of the treaty these families were separated and the parents of children forced to return to possible imprisonment and/or death in their countries of origin. Asylum seekers are not "illegals" unless and until an immigration judge rules so.
Give me one good reason why I should give a **** about asylum seekers.IkeBana » 22 Feb 2021, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey...****...a whole bunch, if not the majority, of the family destruction generated by Trump’s phony "zero tolerance" program was perped on legitimate asylum seekers who were forced by Trump’s blatant violations of the 1951 Refugee Convention Treaty and agreement, to attempt to enter the country illegally. These asylum seekers and their families were, by this country's signing of The Convention treaty, supposed to have been granted entry into the country pending a case by case adjudication by immigration judges on the validity of their applications for asylum. In violation of the treaty these families were separated and the parents of children forced to return to possible imprisonment and/or death in their countries of origin. Asylum seekers are not "illegals" unless and until an immigration judge rules so.
To live in either place, they must have enough money to get out while they can.
Maybe you have an affliction which has affected your vision. Here is the quoted text from the OP but in a larger type size and in bold.nuckinfutz » 22 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Gee, this is so very thoughtful of the Texas sensitivities!
We already know, by your own admission, that you don't give a **** about the law. So now we also know that you don't give a **** about the country honoring treaties to which it is a signatory.FOS » 22 Feb 2021, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Give me one good reason why I should give a **** about asylum seekers.
And with this vacuum of intelligent debate you hereby acknowledge that you have had your *** handed to you on a plate.
IkeBana » 22 Feb 2021, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey...****...a whole bunch, if not the majority, of the family destruction generated by Trump’s phony "zero tolerance" program was perped on legitimate asylum seekers who were forced by Trump’s blatant violations of the 1951 Refugee Convention Treaty and agreement, to attempt to enter the country illegally. These asylum seekers and their families were, by this country's signing of The Convention treaty, supposed to have been granted entry into the country pending a case by case adjudication by immigration judges on the validity of their applications for asylum. In violation of the treaty these families were separated and the parents of children forced to return to possible imprisonment and/or death in their countries of origin. Asylum seekers are not "illegals" unless and until an immigration judge rules so.
You can't win debate points around grown ups when you try to claim victory when you have nothing that suggests you have won anything.IkeBana » 22 Feb 2021, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ And with this vacuum of intelligent debate you hereby acknowledge that you have had your *** handed to you on a plate.
It is clear where my loyalties are. And this is with my people...not with treaties framed on deceptions and lies.IkeBana » 22 Feb 2021, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ We already know, by your own admission, that you don't give a **** about the law. So now we also know that you don't give a **** about the country honoring treaties to which it is a signatory.
Which also provides fair warning that it would be a **** idiot who would sign on to a contract with you, and expect you to actually honor it. Trump is your **** mentor.
You're a real first rate, third rate guy. How do you get through life with yourself knowing you have permanently left any integrity you might once have had, in your other pants. Wait...I know...you're a **** sociopath. If you don't give a **** about your own integrity, you certainly aren't gonna give a **** about any refugees.
I don't care! Don't have a Beaner problem where I live.PXiZ1102 » 22 Feb 2021, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe you have an affliction which has affected your vision. Here is the quoted text from the OP but in a larger type size and in bold.
Federal law enforcement sources report that Border Patrol agents will now rely on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to conduct migrant releases when detention space is not available in the Texas Rio Grande Valley. Migrant releases coordinated specifically by Border Patrol directly into border communities will be a last-resort option. Border Patrol officials are instructed to conduct the local releases only when ICE cannot cope with the level of arrests made by the Border Patrol.
The new policy may bring some relief to local shelters in South Texas border communities located in the Rio Grande Valley depending on where ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officials choose to release the migrants. The change in procedure is likely driven by increased media attention to the issue. It will likely result in migrants being released away from border communities in the Rio Grande Valley.
Users browsing this forum: Al Donal, Alexa [Bot], Anti-republiKlan, Arris, Bidennextpresident, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, Cedar, Coolguy10013, DrMorbius, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Independent, Isabel, Jantje_Smit, LAWZJUSTICE, nefarious101, Neo, neue regel, Nighthawk, OdeToJoy, OpenSiteExplorer [Bot], Pengwin, Polar1ty, PoliticalPopUp, PXiZ1102, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, solon, sooted up Cyndi, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, Vegas giants, WhoDis, Zeets2 and 511 guests