If you’re going to let a guy in a Viking hat overrun you, you damn well SHOULD resign.Bidennextpresident » 23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Steven Sund, the former chief of the US Capitol Police, said his officers were outnumbered by the insurrectionists, who deployed dangerous weapons against law enforcement on January 6.
“These criminals came prepared for war,” Sund said.
Sund announced his resignation from the USCP the day after the Capitol insurrection, amid widespread criticism of his handling of the attack.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/liv ... ve-updates
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he requested that the National Guard be placed on standby in the days before the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol, but House and Senate security officials turned him down.Sund, who resigned his post the day after the riot, told The Washington Post he had been concerned that the protest planned for Jan. 6 would be larger than expected. Sund said he asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the National Guard be placed on standby.Sund said House and Senate sergeants at arms told him they were not comfortable with the “optics” of declaring an emergency days before the protest and suggested Sund should informally ask Guard officials to be on alert. Both have since resigned.Bidennextpresident » 23 Feb 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Senate holds hearing on security failures from Capitol insurrection
The Senate homeland security committee and the Senate rules committee is now holding the joint hearing on the security failures that caused the Capitol insurrection.
Several law enforcement leaders -- former Capitol Police chief Steven Sund, acting Metropolitan Police Department chief Robert Contee, former House sergeant at arms Paul Irving and former Senate sergeant at arms Michael Stenger -- will testify at the hearing.
Bidennextpresident » 23 Feb 2021, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Senate holds hearing on security failures from Capitol insurrection
The Senate homeland security committee and the Senate rules committee is now holding the joint hearing on the security failures that caused the Capitol insurrection.
Several law enforcement leaders -- former Capitol Police chief Steven Sund, acting Metropolitan Police Department chief Robert Contee, former House sergeant at arms Paul Irving and former Senate sergeant at arms Michael Stenger -- will testify at the hearing.
Circle the wagons.Cedar » 23 Feb 2021, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he requested that the National Guard be placed on standby in the days before the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol, but House and Senate security officials turned him down.Sund, who resigned his post the day after the riot, told The Washington Post he had been concerned that the protest planned for Jan. 6 would be larger than expected. Sund said he asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the National Guard be placed on standby.Sund said House and Senate sergeants at arms told him they were not comfortable with the “optics” of declaring an emergency days before the protest and suggested Sund should informally ask Guard officials to be on alert. Both have since resigned.
What did Mitch and Nancy know and when did they know it?
Huey » 23 Feb 2021, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Shouldn't they have had the investigations BEFORE the impeachment and senate trial?
That's an odd answer. Did you think they will also have the 35 cops under investigation testify as well as the ones already suspended? And maybe we can get to the bottom of this as well:
Huey » 23 Feb 2021, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ No, it is the answer of those who have a political agenda and don't care if it is right or wrong.
Bidennextpresident » 23 Feb 2021, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Constitution give authority to impeach to the House of Representatives. The Senate holds the trial. Are you objecting to the US Constitution?
Only if it was a legitimate inquiry. Otherwise, doesn’t matter...would have just been a further waste of time.Huey » 23 Feb 2021, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Shouldn't they have had the investigations BEFORE the impeachment and senate trial?
Huey » 23 Feb 2021, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ Nice spin. There is generally some type of investigation BEFORE the trial and impeachment proceedings.
It was done stupidly. The house had no investigation, so they had no evidence to present at the trial. So they lost.
Users browsing this forum: Al Donal, Alexa [Bot], Annoyed Liberall, Bidennextpresident, Bill Gates [Bot], Blutarski, Buffalo, Cedar, ConsRule, Coolguy10013, Dr. Sliptinschit, Famagusta, FOS, Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Isabel, JeanMoulin, nefarious101, Neo, neue regel, Nighthawk, OdeToJoy, OpenSiteExplorer [Bot], Pengwin, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, sooted up Cyndi, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, Twitter [Bot], Vegas giants, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 576 guests