This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
User avatar
omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 17,445

Zeets2 » 03 May 2021, 5:57 pm » wrote: Well then, how about NASA, if you don't like any of the 6 others I listed?
Read it here and weep, buttercup!:

Then add the scientific research done at UC-San Diego and Northumbria University in Great Britain to the work of NASA, and you've got all you need to know what a farce AGW is, and how gullible you are!  
But you STILL won't believe it, so go back to that hole in the sand and put your head where it belongs, because it's certainly not doing any good above ground!
Concept you never consider as evident to your post. Science assures the same separation of time as spaced apart created by religions life exceeds mutually evolving here practiced historically while people change the population so far reproductively now.

Peace on Earth between humans occupying space will require all sides to rethink their social illusion life exceeds reproductive order. Current events shows that isn't likely to happen before all sides take each other out.

User avatar
Zeets2

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 4,022
Politics: Conservative

Vegasgiants » 03 May 2021, 6:01 pm » wrote: Great. Would you like to read the official policy statement from nasa ?

https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8& ... ate+change
Great, I read it!  So where's the part about NASA supporting their belief in AGW as you claimed?  That "policy statement" you touted so highly says NOTHING about NASA supporting it, nor does it state in any way that would indicate they believe in "global warming".  As a matter of fact, their general statements regarding policy indicates that their interest is in "climate variability" and how climate change could have important impacts on NASA's ability to fulfill its mission, which actually means they have not even determined that global cooling is not taking place.

Only a complete ignoramus could possibly conclude from that policy statement that NASA firmly believes in the hoax of AGW and global warming as you do!  And that makes me think that either YOU didn't read it, or were unable to comprehend it.


 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Zeets2 » 04 May 2021, 8:14 am » wrote: Great, I read it!  So where's the part about NASA supporting their belief in AGW as you claimed?  That "policy statement" you touted so highly says NOTHING about NASA supporting it, nor does it state in any way that would indicate they believe in "global warming".  As a matter of fact, their general statements regarding policy indicates that their interest is in "climate variability" and how climate change could have important impacts on NASA's ability to fulfill its mission, which actually means they have not even determined that global cooling is not taking place.

Only a complete ignoramus could possibly conclude from that policy statement that NASA firmly believes in the hoax of AGW and global warming as you do!  And that makes me think that either YOU didn't read it, or were unable to comprehend it.
These are policy statements from scientific agencies.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/climate.na ... sensus.amp


Give me one that denies agw.


Just one
 

User avatar
Zeets2

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 4,022
Politics: Conservative

Vegasgiants » 03 May 2021, 9:14 am » wrote: That the earth would get hotter

No one denies that one 

Next
Of course they do!  You're simply too gullible to pay attention to anything that disrupts your belief in the agenda of the radical left!
Here's what many scientists have realized:
Satellite Data: No Global Warming For Past 18 Years
By Barbara Hollingsworth | September 30, 2014 | 4:28pm EDT  
Dr. John Christy, director of the University of Alabama/Huntsville's Earth System Science Center, testifies before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works' hearing on global warming in August, 2012.

(CNSNews.com) –  The Earth’s temperature has “plateaued” and there has been no global warming for at least the last 18 years, says Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at the University of Alabama/Huntsville.“That’s basically a fact. There’s not much to comment on,” Christy said when CNSNews.com asked him to remark on the lack of global warming for nearly two decades as of October 1st.The "plateau" is evident in the climate record Christy and former NASA scientist Roy Spencer compiled using actual raw temperature data collected from 14 instruments aboard various weather satellites.CNSNews.com asked Christy why the United Nations’ climate models, which all predicted steeply rising temperatures over the past two decades, were all proven wrong.“You’re going back to a fundamental question of science that when you understand a system, you are able to predict its behavior. The fact that no one predicted what’s happened in the past 18 years indicates we have a long way to go to understand the climate system,” Christy replied.“And that the way the predictions were wrong were all to one direction, which means the predictions or the science is biased in one direction, toward overcooking the atmosphere.”
 
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Zeets2 » 04 May 2021, 8:38 am » wrote: Of course they do!  You're simply too gullible to pay attention to anything that disrupts your belief in the agenda of the radical left!
Here's what many scientists have realized:
Just one.

Just one official policy statement from a scientific agency that denies agw.


Just one


Lol
 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Zeets2 » 04 May 2021, 8:38 am » wrote: Of course they do!  You're simply too gullible to pay attention to anything that disrupts your belief in the agenda of the radical left!
Here's what many scientists have realized:
Global dimming and Ocean absorption. The climate change equivalent to "the dog ate my homework". The Ocean ate my warming.  :rofl:  
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Neo » 04 May 2021, 8:52 am » wrote: Global dimming and Ocean absorption. The climate change equivalent to "the dog ate my homework". The Ocean ate my warming.  Image

Yes it's a serious problem 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 8:55 am » wrote: Yes it's a serious problem
Kids still know what snow is. Exactly 0 people have been forced to move due to rising sea levels. Very super cereal problem indeed. 

Image
 
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Neo » 04 May 2021, 8:59 am » wrote: Kids still know what snow is. Exactly 0 people have been forced to move due to rising sea levels. Very super cereal problem indeed. 


 
That is your scientific  analysis??.


HAHAHAHAHA 

HAHAHAHAHA 

HAHAHAHAHA 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 9:01 am » wrote: That is your scientific  analysis??.

HAHAHAHAHA 

HAHAHAHAHA 

HAHAHAHAHA
That is my analysis of predictions made to scare people into submission. Not one came to pass.
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Neo » 04 May 2021, 9:23 am » wrote: That is my analysis of predictions made to scare people into submission. Not one came to pass.
The nations leading anti climate change expert just weighed in


Thar ain't no climate change cuz kiddies still know what snow is.



Priceless 
 

User avatar
Zeets2

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 4,022
Politics: Conservative

Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 8:16 am » wrote: These are policy statements from scientific agencies.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/climate.na ... sensus.amp

Give me one that denies agw.

Just one
Maybe this will help you understand why you've been suckered so badly into the hoax of global warming and AGW:
Why The AGW Lie Persists
06-Aug-2013 by cosmoscon

 For years I’ve struggled with the fact that supposedly well educated scientists continue to believe the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) lie and the State Run Media (SRM) continues to publish these lies without challenging the facts of the story. There is ample evidence that show:1 – The temperature data has been tampered with – see here and here.2 – The mythical hotspot that would be the signature of the enhanced Greenhouse Effect due to increased levels of CO2 hasn’t been found – see here and here.3 – The Global Climate Models that are revered as holy by the AGW cult haven’t predicted or explained the lack of warming we’ve experienced for the past 15 years – see here and here.4 – Antarctic Ice is expanding and the AGW cult can’t seem to wrap their minds around it – see here.5 – The famed Hockey Stick graph was a fraud – see here.6 – The Vostok Ice Core Data shows we’ve seen temperatures and CO2 levels like this before and more importantly, CO2 levels follow temperature changes (not the other way around) – see here.So why does this lie continue to propagate?  I think I know why and just like a tango, it takes two to make it happen.First we have scientists who have an inferiority complex and a need to be accepted.  These individuals probably had a sad existence growing up and during their school years because they were ‘nerds’ but unlike other nerds (like myself) who were comfortable in their own skin, these climate scientists didn’t like having their fringe theories ridiculed and mocked.  So instead of sticking to the science which didn’t pack a Chicken Little style message, they went hyperbolic and decided to grab peoples’ attentions by claiming the Earth was going to turn into Venus.I’m sure the first time they said this they were laughed out of the room but eventually they added a new part to the story about how we could solve this manufactured crisis and that is when their dance partner started paying attention to them. The second accomplice in the propagation of this lie is the SRM.  These individuals are Leftists so they hate Capitalism and specifically Corporate America and once they heard from the fringe climate scientists that we could solve this manufactured problem by punishing evil Big Oil, super rich automotive companies, dirty power generation companies and any other economic engine of the Free World they realized they had a narrative they could push.Think about it.  The AGW lie and its proposed solutions are tailor made for the Left.  It’s a perfect story to tug at the emotions of innocent citizens who are too ignorant to understand the complicated charts/graphs/math (“NYC will be under water, massive drought, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, Armageddon!!!”).  In order to solve this problem we’ll need a huge Federal Government regulatory effort so we’ll definitely be growing the size of our Public Sector and uniting all Western Countries in an effort to bring us down while building up the Third World countries (since they’ll be exempt to any new regulation).   And what really makes this story sit in the wheel house of the SRM is that the villains in this epic tale are mostly those on the Right. The AGW cult scientists now had a larger concert hall to tell their story (and Al Gore as their cheerleader) where they wouldn’t be mocked and the SRM had a story they could use to beat up Corporate America and grow the Federal Government.  Both dance partners supported each other and both enabled the other.  The SRM stroked the egos of the climate scientists and the climate scientists gave horror stories to the SRM as well as naming villains on the Right. As long as these two dance partners are allowed to have the floor, unchallenged, then the AGW lie will continue to take root in the ignorant public and eventually there will be enough AGW cult members in Congress to act and do something stupid.Let’s hope science and rational thought win the day in the end.  It’s up to us to stop them.
Then try wrapping your tiny brain around this expose':
Cooking Climate Consensus Data: “97% of Scientists Affirm AGW” Debunked 
by William F. Jasper June 5, 2013
https://thenewamerican.com/cooking-clim ... -debunked/

The survey by Australian global-warming activist John Cook, released recently with a massive media sendoff, is rapidly melting, as scientists and statisticians subject it to analysis. And now it’s leaking out that Cook’s e-mails show he was scheming on this fraudulent survey to promote a leftist political agenda for well over a year. Cook made a big media splash in May with the publication of a study by him and several co-authors claiming to prove that climate scientists overwhelmingly support the theory that human activity is warming the planet to dangerous levels. Cook’s claims received their biggest boost on May 16, when President Barack Obama tweeted: “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree:#climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” 

The mainstream media and climate-alarmist blogosphere uncritically accepted the Cook study and trumpeted the consensus claims as gospel. We reported on May 21 (“Global Warming ‘Consensus’: Cooking the Books”) on the critiques of the Cook study by experts who show that Cook cooked the data. Out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That’s less than one percent, not 97 percent. Moreover, as we reported, the Cook study was flawed from the beginning, using selection parameters designed to weight the outcome in favor of the alarmist position.

In a May 22 follow-up article (“Climate ‘Consensus’ Con Game: Desperate Effort Before Release of UN Report”) The New American reported on additional problems with the Cook study and cited a large and growing list of eminent climate scientists — including Nobel Prize recipients and scientists who served on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — who challenge the claim that there is any “scientific consensus” on climate change, or that “the science is settled” in favor of the Al Gore alarmist position.
If you still stubbornly subscribe to your religious hoax after that, read any of these reports on how AGW is a lie:
AGW – An open fraud reaching for total powerJames Wood
https://www.iceagenow.info/agw-an-open- ... tal-power/
 
 
The Stunning Statistical Fraud Behind The Global Warming Scare
IBD 03:12 AM ET 03/29/2018
https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... ing-scare/
Are you starting to get the picture?  When a "scientific agency" is paid millions to find evidence of a specific left-wing agenda, they do so, but their individual research scientists come out and admit that the methods used are a fraud, it makes those agencies you swear by completely worthless for any factual evidence that can be used to warrant the spending of trillions to support it.
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Zeets2 » 04 May 2021, 9:37 am » wrote: Maybe this will help you understand why you've been suckered so badly into the hoax of global warming and AGW:

Then try wrapping your tiny brain around this expose':

If you still stubbornly subscribe to your religious hoax after that, read any of these reports on how AGW is a lie:

Are you starting to get the picture?  When a "scientific agency" is paid millions to find evidence of a specific left-wing agenda, they do so, but their individual research scientists come out and admit that the methods used are a fraud, it makes those agencies you swear by completely worthless for any factual evidence that can be used to warrant the spending of trillions to support it.
You cant find one?


Not even one!


HAHAHAHAHA 
 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 9:26 am » wrote: The nations leading anti climate change expert just weighed in

Thar ain't no climate change cuz kiddies still know what snow is.

Priceless
One dire prediction that came true, just one.
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Neo » 04 May 2021, 9:42 am » wrote: One dire prediction that came true, just one.
Thar still is snow!!!!!   All the proof you need.   Lol

User avatar
Zeets2

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 4,022
Politics: Conservative

Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 9:26 am » wrote: The nations leading anti climate change expert just weighed in

Thar ain't no climate change cuz kiddies still know what snow is.

Priceless
So where are those "rising sea levels" you're clearly so panic-stricken over?
Image 
 Your turn.  Find me some pictures that show the massive rise in sea levels you claim over the past 100 years.





 
 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 9:43 am » wrote: Thar still is snow!!!!!   All the proof you need.   Lol
There is still snow in exactly the same places there was snow in the 1960s, 1860s, and 1760s. No **** change. 

"According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event". ... "Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said in 2000."

Here we are, 21 years later (more than a few) and kids still get snowed on just as much as they did in 2000.
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Neo » 04 May 2021, 9:56 am » wrote: There is still snow in exactly the same places there was snow in the 1960s, 1860s, and 1760s. No **** change. 

"According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event". ... "Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said in 2000."

Here we are, 21 years later (more than a few) and kids still get snowed on just as much as they did in 2000.
I know.  So based on what one scientist said all of climate science is wrong


Priceless
 

User avatar
Neo

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 32,803
Politics: Conservative

Roll Out
Vegasgiants » 04 May 2021, 10:01 am » wrote: I know.  So based on what one scientist said all of climate science is wrong

Priceless
Based on not a single alarmist prediction coming to pass the predictions are certainly suspect.
 
 

User avatar
Vegas giants

Share      Unread post

User avatar
Track Star, Question Ducker
Track Star, Question Ducker
Posts: 8,584

Well we all know NASA faked the moon landing to keep the funding going......right? Lol

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arris, Benson13, Bidennextpresident, Bill Gates [Bot], Blutarski, Buffalo, Cannonpointer, crimsongulf, Famagusta, FOS, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Ike Bana, Independent, Jantje_Smit, Neo, neue regel, OdeToJoy, Polar1ty, PoliticalPopUp, RollingRock, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, slideman, solon, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, Twitter [Bot], user1621114932, Vegas, Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 603 guests