ABSOLUTELY NOT! I NEVER said Kaepernick shouldn't face the consequences of his actions. If you choose to call a business owner making a business decision not to hire someone "punishment", you're a fool! Business owners decide for themselves whether a person is worth hiring or not, and that the salary they demand is not the only criteria that used! If the owner of a football team needs a quarterback, but believes that Kaepernick would be a bad influence on the rest of his team, THAT IS THE CONSEQUENCE THAT KAEPERNICK'S ACTIONS RESULTED IN! Even if an owner's ONLY issue with Kaepernick is kneeling for the National Anthem, and is his sole criteria for not offering him a contract, HE HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO HIRE HIM! I've hired HUNDREDS of employees in my businesses, and rejected hundreds of others for various reasons, ALL OF WHICH IS MY RIGHT TO DO AS AN EMPLOYER. Granted, the law does not permit me to refuse to hire someone because of their race, religion, or sexual preferences, but it's virtually impossible to prove that a business owner is guilty of such discrimination.
Zeets2 » 14 Jan 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑
And no, I DON'T believe Trump should have been banned from Twitter, but I've already stated that Twitter HAS THE RIGHT TO DO SO, my own opinion notwithstanding.
Is that so difficult for a liberal like you to understand?
Because I DON'T like it! How thick do you have to be to not understand the difference? I may not LIKE something, but that doesn't mean that I don't recognize a person's right to do what they want with their property! And a person's business is THEIR PROPERTY! I DESPISE Twitter for having the audacity to revoke Trump's ability to tweet, BUT I believe it's their right to do so! And the consequences for them invoking that authority is that myself and probably hundreds of thousands of others have stopped using them, which is OUR right to react to that Twitter decision. And along the same lines, if I don't like the policy of the NFL to allow their players to kneel for the National Anthem, the option I'm taking is to refuse to watch pro football any longer AND choose not to patronize their advertisers. Are you going to try to deny that I have the right to react that way?
BWAHAAAHAHA! Ulnar struck!Zeets2 » 14 Jan 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑****! That's a total lie, and I DARE you to repost what I stated that you claim indicates I wanted either Kaepernick or Trump silenced!
And scumbags liberals like you continue to lie about that because you're too ignorant to understand my position. I DESPISE the cancel culture you liberal idiots have happily established. But I can continue to operate as I have without giving the slightest **** about what you morons choose to "cancel" today or tomorrow. I DON'T "cancel" anything I choose not to, and there's not a thing a dope like you can do about it!
Laugh it up, dickhead! I don't permit ANY brainless liberal like you OR SJ to lie about what I do or say! And I've got no problem whatsoever to call you a **** lying scumbag to your face when you do!
BWAHAAAHAHA! Ulnar struck! Part deux!
Yes comrade, the reason it has never worked is because it's never been tried by the right people. Progressives seem to want to be next in that long line of dismal failures. Hard pass.IkeBana » 14 Jan 2022, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑
Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot], Arris, Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, Crazytrain, Deezer Shoove, dickens, Doug1943, FJB, GHETTO BLASTER, Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Ike Bana, Isabel, Jinn Martini, LibDave, miketx, nefarious101, Neo, PaperLi [Bot], Pengwin, pwingly, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, supraTruth, Taipan, thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 611 guests