WE KNOW YOU CAN FACILITATE THE INSTALLATION OF NUKES IN CUBA....Xavier_Onassis » 13 May 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ There are zero plans to install any sort of nukes in Cuba.
There are already installed nukes all along the border of Russia.
Finns have the right for their country to join NATO if they so desire.
Putin is a cruel and scheming tyrant., The more he can be suppressed, the better.
I SAY RUSSIA SHOULD INSTALL NUKES IN CUBA.walkingstick » 13 May 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ russia must stop usa from installing nuclear weapons in finland. /// usa must stop russia from installing nuclear weapons in cuba.
You don't see the hypocrisy? How is Putin any different from JFK on this issue?Xavier_Onassis » 13 May 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ There are zero plans to install any sort of nukes in Cuba.
There are already installed nukes all along the border of Russia.
Russia has a history of aggression against Finland.Neo » 13 May 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ You don't see the hypocrisy? How is Putin any different from JFK on this issue?
Cuba has a history of facing aggression from the US. From crippling sanctions still in place to this day to the Bay of Pigs. Who are we to say that they can't defend themselves from US aggression in the manner they see fit?Pastafarian » 13 May 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ Russia has a history of aggression against Finland.
If the Finns want to protect their country through NATO, bcuz they are aware of Russia’s aggressive tactics, that is their prerogative.
Why do you think Russia should have the last say about how their neighbors protect themselves from Russian aggression?
JFK did not invade Cuba. JFK did not invade Cuba, killing thousands of civilians.Neo » 13 May 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ You don't see the hypocrisy? How is Putin any different from JFK on this issue?
Cuba should be able to defend themselves.Neo » 13 May 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Cuba has a history of facing aggression from the US. From crippling sanctions still in place to this day to the Bay of Pigs. Who are we to say that they can't defend themselves from US aggression in the manner they see fit?
Yeah, go ahead and move troops into Finland, you dumb-**** Russian. While you are freezing your *** off in Finland and painting Ukrainian buildings with Russian blood, the CIA will be coordinating an attack with Japan and Korea to liberate East-Asia.walkingstick » 13 May 2022, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ russia must stop usa from installing nuclear weapons in finland. /// usa must stop russia from installing nuclear weapons in cuba.
The Finns already taught the Russians a lesson once before.Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, go ahead and move troops into Finland, you dumb-**** Russian. While you are freezing your *** off in Finland and painting Ukrainian buildings with Russian blood, the CIA will be coordinating an attack with Japan and Korea to liberate East-Asia.
The Finns and the Swedes are competent warriors.Pastafarian » 13 May 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ The Finns already taught the Russians a lesson once before.
Japan won't take part in a firing war with Russia.Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, go ahead and move troops into Finland, you dumb-**** Russian. While you are freezing your *** off in Finland and painting Ukrainian buildings with Russian blood, the CIA will be coordinating an attack with Japan and Korea to liberate East-Asia.
I don't always agree with you, Jinn, but on this much I agree. Do you believe after WW3, assuming the US, Japan and Europe wins, and assuming there are still people and governments here on earth, that we will allow Russia (or China) to have Eastern Asia? Do you really believe the CIA and top US military strategists haven't thoroughly identified East Asia as a point of extreme Russian vulnerability? Of extreme North Korean vulnerability?JinnMartini » 13 May 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑
And anyway . . . the US is already positioning for WW3 .
My personal opinion on Cuba is we should have normalized relations decades ago.Pastafarian » 13 May 2022, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cuba should be able to defend themselves.
Obama tried to relax sanctions and your side soiled themselves.
Then Trump upped the sanctions again and your side said it was through t thing to do.
You talk a good game but you don’t really believe in what you say. And you don’t mind hypocrisy when your side is the one doing it.
Let's back an angry nuclear armed bear into a corner because their conventional army is ****, that makes a lot of sense. He's backed up by nukes Trayvon Martin's mom, he don't need to take a whooping.johndnorth » 13 May 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Russia is a third world country with nukes. The Russian army is next to worthless. The air force is ancient and ill maintained. Russia cannot even produce their SU-57 stealth fighter in any meaningful numbers. Russia has virtually NO semiconductor industry and the products they produce are ancient. The Russian economy is built on energy exports and weapons sales. The energy exports are being strangled and the weapon sales customers are shifting to USA products. Modern NATO countries would destroy any Russian aggression against a NATO member. Finland and Sweden should make their own decision about joining NATO. Putin is all bluster backed up by NOTHING.
Actually, the way I see it . . . we do agree on most things . . . other than the Ukr/Rus thing.Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ I don't always agree with you, Jinn, but on this much I agree.
There won't be any winner.Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Do you believe after WW3, assuming the US, Japan and Europe wins . . .
People yes . . . but no governmentsSkans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ and assuming there are still people and governments here on earth . . .
The survivors will be too busy searching for food to "allow" anything.Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ . . . that we will allow Russia (or China) to have Eastern Asia?
Those are the ones orchestrating WW3Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Do you really believe the CIA and top US military strategists haven't thoroughly identified East Asia as a point of extreme Russian vulnerability?
WW3 will be fought everywhere !Skans » 13 May 2022, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Russia is historically quite strong on its Western border with Europe. I can assure you, the war won't be fought there.
We could all be the last generations of humans here on Earth. I feel special.JinnMartini » 13 May 2022, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, the way I see it . . . we do agree on most things . . . other than the Ukr/Rus thing.
There won't be any winner.
People yes . . . but no governments
The survivors will be too busy searching for food to "allow" anything.
Those are the ones orchestrating WW3
WW3 will be fought everywhere !
Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot], Annoyed Liberall, Beekeeper, Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, crimsongulf, DeplorablePatriot, Famagusta, FOS, GHETTO BLASTER, golfboy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, hc73, Ike Bana, Independent, Jantje_Smit, jefftec, Jinn Martini, michaelf, Monderegal, nefarious101, NEILCAR, neue regel, Olivaw, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, ROG62, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Skans, sooted up Cyndi, Squatchman, Steve Jobs [Bot], TB7, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, Xavier_Onassis, Yandex [Bot], Zeets2 and 546 guests