GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Jun 2022, 12:01 am » wrote: ↑ Dishonesty.....yes...
He reminds me of Vegas Giants.
Oil tankers run on inexpensive bunker oil, and the cost of delivery is not excessive.GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Jun 2022, 12:05 am » wrote: ↑ How much fuel is burned lugging it half way around the world...?
The cost of the "bunker Oil" is immaterial.Xavier_Onassis » 23 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Oil tankers run on inexpensive bunker oil, and the cost of delivery is not excessive.
If you really wanted to know the answer to your questions, you could find the answer online, you know.
When the US was allegedly "energy independent" the consumption was a lot less than it is today. The US cannot produce enough petroleum to sustain all its needs. Not with more pipelines or more drilling.
What did Trump do as soon as he blathered triumphantly about "energy independence"?
The ******* got Congress to allow US oil to be EXPORTED to ANYWHERE.
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Baidu [Spider], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, Famagusta, freeman, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Holdor, Ike Bana, impartialobserver, Independent, jackowen, Jantje_Smit, jeffey17, jefftec, Jinn Martini, Monderegal, murdock, nefarious101, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, razoo, roadkill, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Squatchman, Staplophobia, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Warcok, Wayback Machine [Bot], Xavier_Onassis, Zeets2 and 558 guests