which, apparently, makes perfect sense to someone who eats a lot of red wax rind.omh » 22 Jun 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ every time you use toady, my brain switches it to today. makes you look as stupid as you post.
Jantje_Smit+1. 23 minutes ago
But you haven't watched any of it, right?NEILCAR » 22 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Smoke and mirrors along with more Dem fake news … not one shred of evidence.
Everyone is worried about inflation and drugs entering the Southern Boarder… no one cares about 1/6.
No need ... just another fake dem news like collusions, obstruction, Kavanaugh, dems killed hunter laptop story, State of NY drops charges against Trump ... the list goes on and one ...
So, are you taking someone else's word for it?NEILCAR » 22 Jun 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No need ... just another fake dem news like collusions, obstruction, Kavanaugh, dems killed hunter laptop story, State of NY drops charges against Trump ... the list goes on and one ...
People are and will be voting on inflation, gas prices, drugs coming from the Southern Boarder ... they will not be voting on another dem fake news story... lol
NEILCAR » 22 Jun 2022, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ The dems drop "Contempt of Congress" charges regarding 1/6 ... that means that they have no proof ... it is over ...
You should prosecute the demonstrators for trespassing, destruction of public prosperity, illegal demonstration, ... but no insurrection ... they went home afterwards lol
I am not taking anyone's word for it ... I have not seen any evidence ...
No, nothing of the sort, NeilThe dems drop "Contempt of Congress" charges regarding 1/6 ... that means that they have no proof ..
Then how would you know?I am not taking anyone's word for it ... I have not seen any evidence .
it is a common language everyone speaking English uses same vocabulary differently. Why every word has several translations for different outcomes from its core use.
FIFY...With Each Passing Hoax, My Toadying Pride Groweth Increasingly Pompous.Blackvegetable » 21 Jun 2022, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The advantage of averting your eyes is that you can remain skeptical of the sworn testimony of Grifty's Constitutional Terpitude.
2. Pressure was widespread, institutional and helped destroy personal lives
Bowers testified that Trump asked him to entertain the idea of replacing Biden's slate of electors and replace them with people who were pro-Trump. He said he didn't "want to be used as a pawn," and told the president, "You are asking me to do something to break my oath and I will not break my oath."
Bowers refused to bow to the pressure, citing his faith and oath to the Constitution, but he paid a price for that. He described a "new pattern in our lives" when groups would come to his home on Saturdays and sometimes issue threats.
He said his "gravely ill daughter" was upset by what was happening outside.
"So it was disturbing, just disturbing," he said.
The pressure was widespread, from a multimillion-dollar ad campaign and the institutional help of the Republican National Committee to Trump meeting with state lawmakers in person, making threatening phone calls, as well as delivering public speeches and tweets that spurred threats, protests at houses and doxxing of personal information.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/21/11063448 ... ee-hearing
Be sure to repeat that after the committee makes criminal referrals to the Justice Depart.NEILCAR » 22 Jun 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No need ... just another fake dem news like collusions, obstruction, Kavanaugh, dems killed hunter laptop story, State of NY drops charges against Trump ... the list goes on and one ...
People are and will be voting on inflation, gas prices, drugs coming from the Southern Boarder ... they will not be voting on another dem fake news story... lol
thelion » 22 Jun 2022, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Be sure to repeat that after the committee makes criminal referrals to the Justice Depart.
Jan. 6 committee will not make any criminal referrals, chairman saysthelion » 22 Jun 2022, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Be sure to repeat that after the committee makes criminal referrals to the Justice Depart.
Catch upHuey » 22 Jun 2022, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Jan. 6 committee will not make any criminal referrals, chairman says
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna22325
No...the committee can hold people in contempt, but it has no power of enforcement.NEILCAR » 22 Jun 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ If you had proof… you would be hitting me over the head 3 times a day for the last 2 weeks.
They dropped the charges because of no proof.
Blackvegetable » 22 Jun 2022, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ No...the committee can hold people in contempt, but it has no power of enforcement.
Because any litigation would go on for years, there was no incentive to issue a referral.
In the case of Meadows, he's already surrendered enough documentary evidence to leave him up the creek.
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron."
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
Here is evidence that you are a moron:
- You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
- You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one.
- You don't know the purpose of a title.
- You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism.
- You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others.
- You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.
For your usual "do you want to see evidence that you are a moron."
- Pic, which I easily cancel out.
- Media comment, which you cannot refute...**** your cop-out response.
- Trump fraud OP, which I always respond with 2000 Mules...fact checker got owned.
- Potus 2008, LOL! You are still suffering from that one.
- Your stupid horse and fictitious character, to which nobody gives a ****.
- Cheese. To which I reply 1/1000s , embarrassing stat.
- I am sure I forgetting one, but whatever it is, it has already been refuted.
Here is evidence that you are a moron:
- You think skewed samples lead to higher accuracy.
- You still don't know the difference between an exponential model and a logarithmic one.
- You don't know the purpose of a title.
- You cannot post an OP with any level 2+ thoughts of your own, stone-throw...plagiarism.
- You incessantly hide behind questions/demands and you have to run by turning it all around on others.
- You cannot come up with different insults, always something about my uncle and unemployable.
Users browsing this forum: Annoyed Liberall, Baidu [Spider], Bill Gates [Bot], Buffalo, Cannonpointer, ConsRule, DeplorablePatriot, Famagusta, freeman, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Hank, Holdor, Ike Bana, impartialobserver, Independent, jackowen, Jantje_Smit, jeffey17, jefftec, Jinn Martini, Monderegal, murdock, nefarious101, NEILCAR, Neo, neue regel, PaperLi [Bot], Pastafarian, razoo, roadkill, ScottMon, Semrush [Bot], SJConspirator, Squatchman, Staplophobia, Steve Jobs [Bot], Taipan, thelion, Twitter [Bot], Vegas, walkingstick, Wayback Machine [Bot], Xavier_Onassis, Zeets2 and 554 guests