This political chat room is for you to sound off about any political ideology and discuss current political topics. Everyone is welcome, yes, even conservatives, but keep in mind, the nature of the No Holds Barred political chat forum platform can be friendly to trolling. It is your responsibility to address this wisely. Forum Rules
User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative


User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11,629

More theater and staged performances from all angles going in one direction.

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative

omh » 20 Jul 2022, 3:47 pm » wrote: More theater and staged performances from all angles going in one direction.

The MSM is lying to us...try addressing that for a change.

The MSM lies just like many here do.  

User avatar
GHETTO BLASTER

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,563
Politics: Republican


Veritas has a solid reason to appeal.
I would like to get a good luck at the Judge who said there is no difference between a major news network accusing Veritas of lying versus accidentally filming someone's address.

User avatar
nuckin futz

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,401
Politics: Independent

hahahahahahahahahahah!
Road Scum is a laugh a minute!
:die:  
Don't let the Grizz catch you with yer pants down!
Image
 
 

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11,629

roadkill » 21 Jul 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: The MSM is lying to us...try addressing that for a change.

The MSM lies just like many here do.  
Be honest, they don't lie, they ration truth to fit a narrative, just like your reality does.

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2022, 10:29 pm » wrote: Veritas has a solid reason to appeal.
I would like to get a good luck at the Judge who said there is no difference between a major news network accusing Veritas of lying versus accidentally filming someone's address.
"Project Veritas’ CNN investigation exposing Technical Director, Charlie Chester, continues to make headlines.Chester was the individual who admitted to our undercover journalist that his network engaged in “propaganda” to get Trump out of office."

User avatar
ScottMon

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,053
Politics: Libertarian

Project Veritas complaining about the truth?  Really? 
 

User avatar
nuckin futz

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,401
Politics: Independent

ROAD SCUM will never recognize the truth, ever!hahahah
Image
 
 

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11,629

nuckin futz » 29 Jul 2022, 3:47 pm » wrote: ROAD SCUM will never recognize the truth, ever!hahahah
Image
 
 
Neither will the faithful pledging allegiance to idealists to protect the ideas come hell or high water. Power of suggestion is so abused for thousands of years there isn't a generation 0of this species that hasn't been trained to ignore the kinetics of biological eternal separation of population present except one instinctive sole everyone rejects the idea physical eternity is the moment here all cycles of life evolve within as the arrival of great great grandchildren verify one at a time.

User avatar
thelion

Share      Unread post

User avatar
  
  
Posts: 131
Politics: Capitalist

Cons believe PV and think the MSM is lying. 

no wonder they’re f’ed up. 

User avatar
Warcok

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 1,936
Politics: Nationalist

thelion » 29 Jul 2022, 4:58 pm » wrote: Cons believe PV and think the MSM is lying. 

no wonder they’re f’ed up.
Has any of protect veritas undercover work been thoroughly proven wrong? I've only seen 2-3 of their reportings years ago, but the only argument i keep hear from the left is that it's fake, heavily edited, out of context..etc, but never back it up with proof/evidence.

I wanna hear someone debunk these **** without a reasonable doubt 

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative

GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2022, 10:29 pm » wrote: Veritas has a solid reason to appeal.
I would like to get a good luck at the Judge who said there is no difference between a major news network accusing Veritas of lying versus accidentally filming someone's address.
Alaskan Rino may have some problems...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x-6WsnI9bk
 

User avatar
GHETTO BLASTER

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 5,563
Politics: Republican

When the Republicans need to be exposed for dirty dealing....Veritas is right there too...... Image  
Have you ever seen a Libtard applaud the exposure..maybe even the prosecution of their own ..?
 

User avatar
B.See

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,405
Politics: Liberal

nuckinfutz » 29 Jul 2022, 3:47 pm » wrote: ROAD SCUM will never recognize the truth, ever!hahahah
Image
Nor would ANY of Trump's sycophants and apologists.

The REICH has a PENCHANT for naming laws, movements, organizations and ideology with words that mean the exact OPPOSITE of what they do and STAND for. Hence, "stop" the steal, "true" the vote, "Truth" Social and numerous other forms of deceptive **** like that.

TRUTH is, O'Keefe and at least SOME of his associates have benefited from the usual PRIVILEGE afforded SOME, when they too should've been locked the **** up, LONG ago:

From James O'Keefe - wikipedia (yes that same wiki that the usual sorts will dismiss as liberally biased while they fail to disprove ANY of it):James O'Keefe: an American political activist, provocateur, and self-described "guerilla journalist" who:
  • founded Project Veritas, a far-right activist group that uses deceptive editing techniques to attack mainstream media organizations and progressive groups
  • with Project Veritas have produced secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or illegal behavior by representatives of those organizations
  • recordings that are often selectively edited to misrepresent the context of the conversations and the subjects' responses
  • who has gained national attention for his selectively edited video recordings of workers at ACORN
  • who was arrested, a plead guilty in 2010 for entering the federal office of then-U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) under false pretenses
  • who released misleading videos of conversations with two high-ranking, now former, NPR executives in 2011.
  • whose videos were heavily edited to portray ACORN workers seemingly aiding a couple in criminal planning – were publicized
  • resulting in the U.S. Congress voting to freeze funds for the non-profit, and the non-profit also losing most of its private funding
  • after which investigations of the videos concluded no illegal ACORN activity occurred
  • The Attorney General's Office found that O'Keefe had misrepresented the actions of ACORN workers in California and that the workers had not broken any laws.
  • One of the fired ACORN workers sued O'Keefe for invasion of privacy; O'Keefe issued an apology and agreed to pay $100,000 in a settlement.
  • O'Keefe has support from right-wing and conservative media and interest groups, as well as the far right.
  • In 2009, Andrew Breitbart commissioned him for the option to publish [his] new videos exclusively

User avatar
B.See

Share      Unread post

User avatar
     
     
Posts: 3,405
Politics: Liberal

SPEAKING OF WHICH:

Judge hits Project Veritas with $150,000 bill after they try to kill free speech

Project Veritas, run by ridiculous GOP charlatan James O’Keefe, has been reeling lately. There have been questions surrounding the legality of their unethical reporting practices. They have claimed to have been preyed upon by “fraudsters.”

In May, U.S. District Judge Thomas S. Zilly ruled that Project Veritas’ claims that Stanford University’s school blog, reporting on how debunked every aspect of Veritas’ election fraud claims were, did not amount to defamation. In fact, they were easily provable facts and valid opinions concerning Project Veritas’ attempts to misinform the public about election fraud claims.

On August 4, U.S. District Judge Thomas S. Zilly finalized the ruling in the only way groups like Project Veritas would understand.  Judge Zilly ruled that Project Veritas is on the hook for $149,596.90, to be exact. This is the money that Project Veritas owes to pay off Stanford University’s legal fees.
 

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative

GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Aug 2022, 10:09 pm » wrote: When the Republicans need to be exposed for dirty dealing....Veritas is right there too...... Image  
Have you ever seen a Libtard applaud the exposure..maybe even the prosecution of their own ..?
And it's not the first republican that PV has exposed. Another had to shut down his campaign based on what PV exposed.
 
 

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11,629

you ever watch the movie "Absences of Malice"?.

User avatar
roadkill

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 14,515
Politics: Conservative

omh » 12 Aug 2022, 7:23 am » wrote: you ever watch the movie "Absences of Malice"?.

I think so...but I don't remember it.

User avatar
Nostradamus' omh

Share      Unread post

User avatar
      
      
Posts: 11,629

roadkill » 12 Aug 2022, 7:24 am » wrote: I think so...but I don't remember it.
Art and reality debate. Humanity is designed around it.