Veritas; meaning Truth

[Xavier_Onassis]

Art and reality debate. Humanity is designed around it.

Yeah, and they do it by kinetic genetics never the same thing twice, to the fourth generation of the Rule of 72 and a fine howdy-do.

[Skans]

Veritas has a solid reason to appeal.
I would like to get a good luck at the Judge who said there is no difference between a major news network accusing Veritas of lying versus accidentally filming someone's address.

The 11th Circuit is very conservative too.  They ain't gonna like some dumb 'ol liberal judge.
 

[Xavier_Onassis]

Project Veritas is a propaganda organization, they do not give a **** about the truth.

[Nostradamus' omh]

Yeah, and they do it by kinetic genetics never the same thing twice, to the fourth generation of the Rule of 72 and a fine howdy-do.

4th generation is 2 parenting each change of population forward being last added great great grandchild one at a time forward from here, or not anymore point of relative extinction in plain sight.

Thermodynamic kinetic genetics as self evidently occupying space here now. The exponential whole of stationary time where evolving only adapts in space occupying the moment now as individually alive to one's reproductive cycle conceived to decomposed, evolving or decomposing.

[B. See is a shill]

Nor would ANY of Trump's sycophants and apologists.

The REICH has a PENCHANT for naming laws, movements, organizations and ideology with words that mean the exact OPPOSITE of what they do and STAND for. Hence, "stop" the steal, "true" the vote, "Truth" Social and numerous other forms of deceptive **** like that.

TRUTH is, O'Keefe and at least SOME of his associates have benefited from the usual PRIVILEGE afforded SOME, when they too should've been locked the **** up, LONG ago:

From James O'Keefe - wikipedia (yes that same wiki that the usual sorts will dismiss as liberally biased while they fail to disprove ANY of it):James O'Keefe: an American political activist, provocateur, and self-described "guerilla journalist" who:

• founded Project Veritas, a far-right activist group that uses deceptive editing techniques to attack mainstream media organizations and progressive groups
• with Project Veritas have produced secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or illegal behavior by representatives of those organizations
• recordings that are often selectively edited to misrepresent the context of the conversations and the subjects' responses
• who has gained national attention for his selectively edited video recordings of workers at ACORN
• who was arrested, a plead guilty in 2010 for entering the federal office of then-U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) under false pretenses
• who released misleading videos of conversations with two high-ranking, now former, NPR executives in 2011.
• whose videos were heavily edited to portray ACORN workers seemingly aiding a couple in criminal planning – were publicized
• resulting in the U.S. Congress voting to freeze funds for the non-profit, and the non-profit also losing most of its private funding
• after which investigations of the videos concluded no illegal ACORN activity occurred
• The Attorney General's Office found that O'Keefe had misrepresented the actions of ACORN workers in California and that the workers had not broken any laws.
• One of the fired ACORN workers sued O'Keefe for invasion of privacy; O'Keefe issued an apology and agreed to pay $100,000 in a settlement.
• O'Keefe has support from right-wing and conservative media and interest groups, as well as the far right.
• In 2009, Andrew Breitbart commissioned him for the option to publish [his] new videos exclusively

"wikipedia"    
 

[roadkill]

Veritas has a solid reason to appeal.
I would like to get a good luck at the Judge who said there is no difference between a major news network accusing Veritas of lying versus accidentally filming someone's address.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WUChcxm89Y&t=78s
 

[Skans]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqsKgx8uW5g

Hopefully, Project Veritas will win the appeal and be allowed to kick CNN's ***.
 

[roadkill]

Hopefully, Project Veritas will win the appeal and be allowed to kick CNN's ***.

They usually do...in fact I think they always do.   

[B.See]

Project Veritas is a propaganda organization, they do not give a **** about the truth.

No they don't. They've been a manipulative, lying bunch of con-artists who've had the PRIVILEGE of skirting the law while producing their heavily edited and deliberately distorted hit pieces. They wouldn't know "truth" if it sneaked up and bit 'em in the ***.
 

[Nostradamus' omh]

No they don't. They've been a manipulative, lying bunch of con-artists who've had the PRIVILEGE of skirting the law while producing their heavily edited and deliberately distorted hit pieces. They wouldn't know "truth" if it sneaked up and bit 'em in the ***.
 

Rule of law covers up the original sin of humans staging ways to ignore now is eternity since dawn of civilization governed by context means more than genetic time occupying space as ancestrally displaced now with an ever changing population delivered one ancestor at a time to current total sum in this atmosphere.

[Skans]

They usually do...in fact I think they always do.

The 11th Circuit is in the most conservative area of the United States.   I wouldn't be surprised if the Justices aren't patrons and ardent supporters of Project Veritas.
 

[roadkill]

The 11th Circuit is in the most conservative area of the United States.   I wouldn't be surprised if the Justices aren't patrons and ardent supporters of Project Veritas.

Could be...but the point is, did Project Veritas do something wrong.  No!


This is not the first angry ******* have tried to sue PV...and I believe PV has won every time, whether initially or in appeal.  

[Skans]

Could be...but the point is, did Project Veritas do something wrong.  No!

 

The question is not whether Project Veritas did something wrong, it is whether CNN committed slander in misreporting why PV was banned from Twitter.  PV admits that it did in fact accidentilly do something wrong - dox an address of someone they were interviewing.  Twitter used this as a pretext to ban PV.  However, CNN reported that PV was banned for reporting lies and fake news.

This is not the first angry ******* have tried to sue PV...and I believe PV has won every time, whether initially or in appeal.

You've got this backwards.  PV sued CNN.  That's what the video was about.

[roadkill]

The question is not whether Project Veritas did something wrong, it is whether CNN committed slander in misreporting why PV was banned from Twitter.  PV admits that it did in fact accidentilly do something wrong - dox an address of someone they were interviewing.  Twitter used this as a pretext to ban PV.  However, CNN reported that PV was banned for reporting lies and fake news.

You've got this backwards.  PV sued CNN.  That's what the video was about.

OK...thanx for correcting me.  It's been a while since I've seen that video.


Yes...CNN made false claims and "intent" plays a roll legally and PV did not have the intent.  

[Nostradamus' omh]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqsKgx8uW5g
 
 

simple right or wrong,
A. is now eternity?
B. there is no such thing as genetics being eternally separated existing here now as evolved into numbers inhabiting the atmosphere here as the entire food chain native to this planet?

A. yes or no
B. absolutely correct or entirely wrong

C. Everyone navigates individually here
D. nobody knows why one is here now

C. true or false
D. Creationism theology or evolution theory

F. never existed before, constantly evolving since conceived, or evolved until decomposed. The numbers that are evolving live in series parallel geographical locations now.

[Buffalo]

Project Veritas is a propaganda organization, they do not give a **** about the truth.

Your liberal **** is not the truth, nasty!!!
 

[Nostradamus' omh]

Yeah, and they do it by kinetic genetics never the same thing twice, to the fourth generation of the Rule of 72 and a fine howdy-do.

same total sum forward again. Called compounding evolving per individual present universally timed apart now. those cycles between inception and extinction that last occupying space conceived to decomposed occupying space currently performing all the social deeds taking place spontaneously here simultaneously as geographically happening.

that kinetic self evident result thing each is part within the whole.

[roadkill]

The question is not whether Project Veritas did something wrong, it is whether CNN committed slander in misreporting why PV was banned from Twitter.  PV admits that it did in fact accidentilly do something wrong - dox an address of someone they were interviewing.  Twitter used this as a pretext to ban PV.  However, CNN reported that PV was banned for reporting lies and fake news.

You've got this backwards.  PV sued CNN.  That's what the video was about.

NYC mayor gets popped...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FBwbFRX2kk
 

[roadkill]

No they don't. They've been a manipulative, lying bunch of con-artists who've had the PRIVILEGE of skirting the law while producing their heavily edited and deliberately distorted hit pieces. They wouldn't know "truth" if it sneaked up and bit 'em in the ***.

Loser dem NYC mayor can't say what the hell he means...he can't handle his job!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oq8lF25Z_EQ
 

[roadkill]

Your liberal **** is not the truth, nasty!!!

Why are democrats always on the run? Why are they always trying to hide things from the public?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Syr6VL6PjE